Methodology Matters in Iran

Researching Social Movements in Authoritarian Contexts

in Anthropology of the Middle East
Author:
Paola Rivetti Dublin City University paola.rivetti@dcu.ie

Search for other papers by Paola Rivetti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3167/ame.2017.120106
Keywords:
activism; co-research; fieldwork; Iran; methodology; social movements
Restricted access

All currencies in US Dollar

PayPal Logo

Abstract

How can scholars conduct fieldwork in an authoritarian environment, engaging ‘dangerous’ topics such as social movements in Iran? How can they overcome the limitations imposed by the authoritarian state and win the trust of activists? This article reflects on the knowledge that scholars produce under such difficult circumstances, arguing that the deployment of non-mainstream research practices and methods can benefit the scholarship, exposing under-studied and overlooked aspects of the topic investigated. More specifically, the article elaborates on how methodological choices inform the knowledge we produce and how they can therefore be used to overcome structural limitations generating innovative and fairer scholarship.

Contributor Notes

Paola Rivetti (PhD) is assistant professor in the School of Law and Government at Dublin City University. E-mail: paola.rivetti@dcu.ie

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Cover Anthropology of the Middle East
Article Category:
Research Article
Page Count:
12
Keywords:
activism; co-research; fieldwork; Iran; methodology; social movements
Print Publication Date:
01 Jun 2017
Online Publication Date:
01 Jun 2017
Copyright:
© Berghahn Books 2017

  • Abootalebi, A. (2001), ‘State–Society Relations and Prospects for Democracy in Iran’, Middle East 5, no. 3: 20–37.

  • Albrecht, H. and Schlumberger, O. (2004), ‘“Waiting for Godot”: Regime Change without Democratization in the Middle East’, International Political Science Review 25, no. 4: 371–392.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alcoff, L. (2011), ‘An Epistemology of the Next Revolution’, Transmodernity 1, no. 2: 67–78.

  • Alquati, R. (1993), Per fare conricerca [How to do co-research] (Milano: Calusca).

  • Armano, E., Sacchetto, D. and Wright, S. (2013), ‘Coresearch and Counter-research: Romano Alquati’s Itinerary within and beyond Italian Radical Political Thought’, Viewpoint Magazine, 27 September, https://www.viewpointmag.com/2013/09/27/coresearch-and-counter-research-romano-alquatis-itinerary-within-and-beyond-italian-radical-political-thought.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bakhtin, M. (1982), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (Austin: University of Texas Press).

  • Bayat, A. (2010), Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

  • Bologna, S. (2014), ‘Workerism beyond Fordism: On the Lineage of Italian Workerism’, Viewpoint Magazine, 15 December, https://www.viewpointmag.com/2014/12/15/workerism-beyond-fordism-on-the-lineage-of-italian-workerism/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Carothers, T. (2002), ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’, Journal of Democracy 13, no. 1: 5–21.

  • Chiroli, R. (2017), Ora e sempre NO TAV. Pratiche e identità del movimento valsusino contro l’Alta Velocità [NO TAV for ever. The identity and practices of resistance of the Val Susa’s NO TAV movement against the high speed train] (Milan: Mimesis).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clark, J. (2006), ‘Field Research Methods in the Middle East’, PS: Political Science and Politics 39, no. 3: 1008–1014.

  • Cobarrubias, S. (2011), ‘An Interview with Sandro Mezzadra’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29, no. 4: 584–598.

  • Dussel, E. (2013), Ethics of Liberation: In the Age of Globalization and Exclusion (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).

  • El-Ghobashy, M. (2016), ‘Dissidence and Deference among Egyptian Judges’, Middle East Report 279, http://www.merip.org/mer/mer279/dissidence-deference-among-egyptian-judges.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hegland, M. (2004), ‘Zip in and Zip out Fieldwork’, Iranian Studies 37, no. 4: 575–583.

  • Hegland, M. and Friedl, E. (2006), ‘Methods Applied: Political Transformation and Recent Ethnographic Fieldwork in Iran’, Anthropology of the Middle East 1, no. 2: 1–19.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Keshavarzian, A. (2015), ‘Mutual Comprehension and Hybrid Identities in the Bazaar’, in Persian Language, Literature and Culture, (ed.) K. Talattof (London: Routledge), 239–257.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Khosrokhavar, F. (2000), ‘Toward an Anthropology of Democratization in Iran’, Critique 9, no. 16: 3–29.

  • Kubba, L. (2000), ‘The Awakening of Civil Society’, Journal of Democracy 11, no. 3: 84–90.

  • Malo, M. (ed.) (2004), Nociones Comunes: Experiencias y ensayos entre investigación y militancia [Common notions: Experiences and attempts between inquiry and activism] (Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Baily, J., Lee, M.-Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G. and Muhaham, M. (2001), ‘Power and Positionality: Negotiating Insider/Outsider Status within and across Cultures’, International Journal of Lifelong Education 20, no. 5: 405–416.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nadjmabadi, S. (2004), ‘From “Alien” to “One of Us” and Back: Field Experiences in Iran’, Iranian Studies 37, no. 4: 603–612.

  • Obeid, M. (2015), ‘“States of Aspiration”: Anthropology and New Questions for the Middle East’, in A Companion to the Anthropology of the Middle East, (ed.) S. Altorki (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell), 434–452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013), ‘Conducting Field Research on Gender Relations in a Gender Repressive State: A Case Study of Gender Research in Iran’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26, no. 4: 489–502.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rivetti, P. and Cavatorta, F. (2013), ‘“The Importance of Being Civil Society”: Student Politics and the Reformist Movement in Khatami’s Iran’, Middle Eastern Studies 49, no. 4: 645–660.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rouhani, F. (2004), ‘Multiple Sites of Fieldwork: A Personal Reflection’, Iranian Studies 37, no. 4: 685–693.

  • Saeidi, S. (2010), ‘Creating the Islamic Republic of Iran: Wives and Daughters of Martyrs, and Acts of Citizenship’, Citizenship Studies 14, no. 2: 113–126.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schwedler, J. (2006), ‘The Third Gender: Western Female Researchers in the Middle East’, PS: Political Science & Politics 39, no. 3: 425–428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shahshahani, S. (2006), ‘Reflections on My Research in Iran, 1976–2006’, Anthropology of the Middle East 1, no. 2: 63–71.

  • Suzuki, Y. (2004), ‘Negotiations, Concessions, and Adaptations during Fieldwork in a Tribal Society’, Iranian Studies 37, no. 4: 623–632.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1651 878 23
Full Text Views 67 14 1
PDF Downloads 69 19 2