‘But Isn’t It the Baby that Decides When It Will Be Born?’

Temporality and Women’s Embodied Experiences of Giving Birth

in The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology
Restricted access

This article explores the intermeshing of different forms of time in contemporary childbirth, including the ways in which pregnant women are embedded within, informed by and resist institutional categorizations of reproductive time. While each parturient who participated in my ethnographic study described their own, unique relationships with birthing and time, all women employed clock time to anchor critical phases of their labour. This article puts forward ‘phenomenological time’ as a means of capturing the embodied outcome of the complex relationships amongst the social and institutional times which each woman inhabits, her own individual physiology and her ongoing response throughout the birthing experience. My analysis suggests that further phenomenological studies of birth could lead to a more sophisticated understanding of the relationships between human beings and time, including alternative temporal forms such as multitemporality and ‘reverse progression’ during labour.

Contributor Notes

Joanna White is a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow in the Department of Health and Social Sciences at the University of the West of England. Her research focuses on embodiment, gender and identity, reproduction and sexual behaviour. Her recent work has been published in BMC Health Services Research (2015) and in the edited volume Body Tensions: Reflecting, Resisting, Transforming Time and Space (Interdisciplinary Press, 2014).

  • AdamB. 1995. Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • BaskettT.F. & F. Nagele. 2000. Naegele’s Rule: A Reappraisal. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 107: 143335.

  • BearL. 2014. Doubt, Conflict, Mediation: The Anthropology of Modern Time. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20(S1): 330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DaviesK. 1990. Women Time and the Weaving of the Strands of Everyday Life. Aldershot: Gower.

  • Davis-FloydR. 1992. Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • DowneS. & F. Dykes. 2010. Counting Time in Pregnancy and Labour. In Childbirth Midwifery and Concepts of Time (ed.) C. McCourt6183. Oxford: Berghahn.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Euro-Peristat project with SCPE and EUROCAT. 2013. European Perinatal Health Report: The Health and Care of Pregnant Women in Europe in May 2010. Available at <www.europeristat.com> (accessed 28 September 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FoucaultM. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Pantheon.

  • FoxM. 1989. Unreliable Allies: Subjective and Objective Time. In Taking Our Time: Feminist Perspectives on Temporality (ed.) F.J. Forman & C. Sowton. Oxford: Pergamon.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EveringhamC. 2002. Engendering Time: Gender Equity and Discourses of Workplace Flexibility. Time and Society 11: 33551.

  • GatwardH.M. SimpsonL. Woodhart & M.C. Stainton. 2010. Women’s Experiences of Being Induced for Post-Date Pregnancy. Women and Birth 23: 39.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GoffmanE. 1968. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Harmandsworth: Penguin.

  • HausM. & P. Bailie. 1978. Reversal of Active Labor: A Case Report. Suid-Afrikaanse Mediese Tydskrif 54(12): 5012.

  • McCourtC. & F. Dykes. 2010. From Tradition to Modernity: Time and Childbirth in Historical Perspective. In Childbirth Midwifery and Concepts of Time (ed.) C. McCourt1736. Oxford: Berghahn.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McFarlaneT.J. 1998. The Nature of Time. Available at <http://www.integralscience.org/abouttime.html> (accessed 28 September 2015).

  • MaherJ. 2008. Progressing through Labour and Delivery: Birth Time and Women’s Experiences. Women’s Studies International Forum 31: 12937.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MartinE. 1987. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.

  • MunroR. & O. Belova. 2008. The Body in Time: Knowing Bodies and the Interruption Of Narrative. Sociological Review (Special Issue) 56(S2): 8599.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RothmanB.K. 1991. In Labor: Women and Power in the Birthplace (rev. edn). New York: Norton.

  • SaundersN. & C. Paterson. 1991. Can We Abandon Naegele’s Rule? Lancet 9(8741): 6001.

  • ScammellM. & M. Stewart. 2014. Time, Risk and Midwife Practice: The Vaginal Examination. Health Risk and Society 16(1): 84100.

  • SerresM. 1982. Hermes: Literature Science Philosophy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • SimondsW. 2002. Watching the Clock: Keeping Time During Pregnancy, Birth, and Postpartum Experiences. Social Science and Medicine 55: 55970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithJ.A.P. Flowers & M. Larkin. 2009. Interpretive Phenomeological Analysis: Understanding Method and Application. London: Sage.

  • TeixeiraC.S. Correia & H. Barros. 2013. Risk of Caesarean Section after Induced Labour: Do Hospitals Make a Difference? BMC Research Notes 6: 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas. H. 1992. Time and the Cervix. In Time Health and Medicine (ed.) R. Frankenberg5667. London: Sage.

  • WalshD. 2009. Childbirth Embodiment: Problematic Aspects of Current Understandings. Sociology of Health and Illness 32(3): 486501.

  • WalshD. 2010. Waiting on Birth: Management of Time and Place in a Birth Centre. In Childbirth Midwifery and Concepts of Time (ed.) C. McCourt12644. Oxford: Berghahn.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WestfallR.E. & C. Benoit. 2004. The Rhetoric of ‘Natural’ in Natural Childbirth: Childbearing Women’s Perspectives on Prolonged Pregnancy and Induction of Labour. Social Science and Medicine 59: 1397408.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WhiteJ. & M. Schouten. 2014. Normal Birth as a Cultural Phenomenon. In Normal Birth: Experiences from Portugal and Beyond/O parto normal: experiências de Portugal e além-fronteiras (ed.) J. White & M. Schouten1320. Braga/Lisbon: CICS/CRIA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WHO. 2011. WHO Recommendations for Induction of Labour. Geneva: WHO

  • ZerubavelE. 1979. Patterns of Time in Hospital Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1 1 1
Full Text Views 31 31 31
PDF Downloads 17 17 17