Afterword

For a New Materialist Analytics of Time

in The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology
Author:
Laura Bear London School of Economics L.Bear@lse.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Laura Bear in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

How might we construct a reinvigorated materialist analytics of human time that pushes beyond Marxist approaches? Here, I suggest that anthropology contains rich resources with which to achieve this aim. In particular, it can help us understand the qualities of secular and capitalist ‘modern’ time. An emphasis on time-tricking is especially useful in revealing the technologies of imagination, the ethics and the inequalities of such a temporal orientation. This concept brings into view the materialist ethic, ludic and aesthetic practices, and misrecognitions characteristic of current forms of ‘modern’ time. In addition, ethnographies of time-tricking provide the foundations for a reworking of Marx’s model of free and disposable time by focusing on informalized, social reproductive, excessive and domestic labour. A re-centring of our theories on these significant activities within capitalism is long overdue.

Contributor Notes

Laura Bear is Professor in the Department of Anthropology, London School of Economics. Her most recent publications include Navigating Austerity: Currents of Debt Along a South Asian River (Stanford, 2015) and, with Ritu Birla and Stine Puri, ‘Speculation: Futures and Capitalism in India’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East (2015).

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Abram, S. & G. Weszkalnys. 2011. Anthropologies of Planning: Temporality, Imagination and Ethnography. Focaal 61: 318.

  • Bear, L. 2014. Doubt, Conflict, Mediation: The Anthropology of Modern Time. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20(S1): 330.

  • Bear, L. n.d. The Vitality of Labour: Beyond Alienation and Reification. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Bear, L., K. Ho, A. Tsing & S. Yanagisako. 2015 GENS: A Feminist Manifesto for the Study of Capitalism. Theorising the Contemporary: Cultural Anthropology Online, March. Available at <http://culanth.org/fieldsights/650-generating-capitalism>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bourdieu, P. 2000. Social Being, Time and the Sense of Existence. In Pascalian Meditations, 20645. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cole, J. 2006. Malagasy and Western Conceptions of Memory: Implications for Post-Colonial Politics and the Study of Memory. Ethos 34(2): 21143.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Copeman, J. & J. Quack. 2015. Godless People and Dead Bodies: Materiality and the Making of Atheist Materialism. Social Analysis 59(2): 4061.

  • Gates, H.L. 1988. The Signifying Monkey: a Theory of African-American Literary Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Harms, E. 2011. Saigon’s Edge: On the Margins of Ho Chi Min City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Kahneman, D., P. Slovic & A. Tversky. 1982. Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Korf, J. 2015. Bergsonian Theses in a Contemporary (Neuro-) Biological Context. Mind and Matter 13(1): 10528.

  • MacPhail, T. 2014. The Viral Network: A Pathography of the HIN1 Viral Epidemic. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Magun, A. 2010. Marx’s Theory of Time and the Present Historical Moment. Rethinking Marxism 22(1): 90109.

  • Malinowski, B. 1935. Coral Gardens and Their Magic, Vol. 2. London: Allen and Unwin.

  • Marx, K. 2013 [1884] Capital, Vol. 1 & 2. Ware: Wordsworth Editions.

  • Masco, J. 2014. The Theater of Operations: National Security Affect from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Munn, N. 1986. The Fame of Gawa. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Munn, N. 1992. The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 93123.

  • Pollman, M. & C. Finkenauer. 2009. Empathetic Forecasting: How Do We Predict Each Others’ Feelings? Cognition and Emotion 23(5): 9781001.

  • Posner, M.I. & M.K. Rothbart. 1998. Attention, Self–Regulation and Consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 353(1377): 191527.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ranciere, J. 2012. Proletarian Nights: The Workers’ Dream in Nineteenth-Century France. London: Verso.

  • Sneath, D., M. Holbraad and M.A. Pedersen (eds). 2009. Technologies of the Imagination. Ethnos (Special Issue) 74(1): 530.

  • Stafford, C. 2012, Misfortune and What Can Be Done About It: A Taiwanese Case Study. Social Analysis 56(2): 90102.

  • Tsing, A. 2009. Supply Chains and the Human Condition. Rethinking Marxism 21(2): 14876.

  • Wendling, A. 2009. Karl Marx on Technology and Alienation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2013 745 30
Full Text Views 217 53 1
PDF Downloads 283 66 2