Not Soft Power, But Speaking Softly

‘Everyday Diplomacy’ in Field Relations during the Russia-Ukraine Conflict

in The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology
Restricted access

Based on long-term fieldwork in Russia, but focusing mainly on the aftermath of the 2014 Malaysian airliner downing in Ukraine, this article examines the individual ethnographer and informants alike as unwilling ‘diplomatic’ representatives in the field. Firstly, I discuss the authoritarian political context in Russia and how it affects the notion of ‘soft power’ and ‘public’ discourse. Then I relate the familiar ‘political testing’ experience of researchers by informants, and ‘neutrality’ in field relations (Ergun and Erdemir 2010). Next, I draw on the anthropology of indirect communication to characterize ‘everyday diplomacy’ after the event as a particular kind of civility. I go on to examine attendant affective states of ‘tension, disturbance, or jarring’ (Navaro-Yashin 2012) that both threaten civility and enable it. Finally, I argue that classic ethnographic rapport-building deserves further examination in the light of the porosity of politics, the social environment and the field.

Contributor Notes

Jeremy Morris is Co-director of the Centre for Russian, European and Eurasian Studies (CREES) at the University of Birmingham. A disciplinary pluralist, his research aims to capture the actually lived experience of neoliberal and post-socialist transformation in Russia. He is co-editor of The Informal Postsocialist Economy: Embedded Practices and Livelihoods (Routledge, 2014) and Everyday Postsocialism: Working-class Life Strategies in the Russian Margins (Palgrave, 2016).

  • Abu-LughodL. 1991. Writing against Culture. In Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present (ed.) R. Fox137162. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Abu-LughodL. 1999. Comments upon C. Brumann’s ‘Writing for Culture: Why a Successful Concept Should Not Be Discarded’. Current Anthropology 40(S): 1315.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AdamsL. L. 1999. The Mascot Researcher: Identity, Power, and Knowledge in Fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28: 331363.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AskinsK. 2014. A Quiet Politics of Being Together: Miriam and Rose. Area 46(4): 353354.

  • BlackmanA. 2001. Ambiguity and Verbal Disguise within Diplomatic Culture. In An Anthropology of Indirect Communication (eds) J. Hendry & C.W. Watson225270. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BoydR. 2006. The Value of Civility? Urban Studies 43(5/6): 863878.

  • ButlerJ. 2004. Precarious Life. London: Verso 2004.

  • CaldwellM.L. 2002. The Taste of Nationalism: Food Politics in Post-socialist Moscow. Ethnos 67: 295319.

  • CandeaM. & G. Da Col. 2012. The Return to Hospitality. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N. S.) 18(S1): S1S19.

  • DittmerJ. & K. Dodds. 2008. Popular Geopolitics Past and Future: Fandom, Identities and Audiences/ Geopolitics 13(3): 437457.

  • EliasN. 2000[1937]. The Civilising Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Revised edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  • ErgunA. & A. Erdemir. 2010. Negotiating Insider and Outsider Identities in the Field: ‘Insider’ in a Foreign Land; ‘Outsider’ in One’s Own Land. Field Methods 22: 1638.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GallinatA. 2010. Playing the Native Card: The Anthropologist as Informant in Eastern Germany. In The Ethnographic Self as Resource: Writing Memory and Experience into Ethnography (eds) P. Collins and A. Gallinat2544. Berghahn Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrixJ. & N. Kramareva. 2015. The Sochi Winter Olympics and Russia’s unique soft power strategy. Sport in Society10 November 2015: 115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HerzfeldM. 1997. Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics in the Nation-state. New York: Routledge.

  • KatzC. 1994. Playing the Field: Questions of Fieldwork in Geography. The Professional Geographer 46(1): 6772.

  • KellyC. 1998. Popular Culture. In The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture (ed) N. Rzhevksy125158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KemperS. 2009. Review of Anthropology, Politics, and the State: Democracy and Violence in South Asia by Jonathan Spencer. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 32: 346349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KingwellM. 1995. A Civil Tongue: Justice Dialogue and the Politics of Pluralism. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KobrinK. 2015. Ostrov Robinzona. Colta.ru31 March 2015. <http://www.colta.ru/articles/society/6818> (accessed 18 April 2016).

  • KusowA.M. 2003. Beyond Indigenous Authenticity: Reflections on the Insider/Outsider Debate in Immigration Research. Symbolic Interaction 26(4): 591599.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiamputtongP. 2008. Doing Research in a Cross-Cultural Context: Methodological and Ethical Challenges. In Doing Cross-cultural Research (ed.) P. Liaputtong320. Dordrecht: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LinklaterA. & S. Mennell. 2010. Norbert Elias, The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations – An Overview and Assessment. History and Theory 49: 384411.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LockE. 2009. Soft Power and Strategy: Developing a ‘Strategic’ Conception of Power. In Soft Power and US Foreign Policy: Theoretical Historical and Contemporary Perspectives3250. Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LotmanJ. 1984. The Decembrist in Everyday Life: Everyday Behavior as a Historical-Psychological Category. In The Semiotics of Russian Culture (ed.) A. Shukman71123. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LutmanS. 1967. Orwell’s Patriotism. Journal of Contemporary History 2(2): 149158.

  • MarsdenM. 2012a. Anthropological Fieldwork in Pakistan and Afghanistan Compared. In Articulating Islam: Anthropological Approaches to Muslim Worlds (eds) M. Marsden & R. Konstantinos229245. Dordrecht: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MarsdenM. 2012b. Fatal Embrace: Trading in Hospitality on the Frontiers of South and Central Asia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18(S1): S117S130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MellisenJ. 2005. The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. In The New Public Diplomacy (ed.) J. Melissen327. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merriam S.B.J. Johnson-BaileyL. Ming-YehY. KeeG. Ntseane & M. Muhamad2001. Power and Positionality: Negotiating Insider/Outsider Status within and across Cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education 20(5): 405416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MorrisJ. 2016. Everyday Post-Socialism: Working-Class Communities in the Russian Margins. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • MoserS. 2008. Personality: A New Positionality? Area 40(3): 383392.

  • MullingsB. 1999. Insider or Outsider, Both or Neither: Some Dilemmas of Interviewing in a Cross-cultural Setting. Geoforum 30: 337350

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Navaro-YashinY. 2012. The Make-Believe Space: Affective Geography in a Postwar Polity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Nye JrJ. S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

  • OrtnerS. 1995. Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History 37(1): 173193.

  • OrwellG. 1945. ‘Notes on Nationalism’Polemic October 1945.

  • PainR. & L. Staeheli. 2014. Introduction: Intimacy-Geopolitics and Violence. Area 46: 344347.

  • ParkesP. 2001. Unwrapping Rudeness: Inverted Etiquette in an Egalitarian Enclave. In An Anthropology of Indirect Communication (eds) J. Hendry & C.W. Watson232252. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PerssonE. & B. Petersson 2014. Political Mythmaking and the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi: Olympism and the Russian Great Power Myth. East European Politics 30(2): 192209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PilkingtonH. & E. Omel’chenko 2002. Living with the West. In Looking West? Cultural Globalization and Russian Youth Cultures (eds) H. PilkingtonE. Omel’chenkoM. FlynnU. Bliudina & E. Starkova201215. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pitt-RiversJ.A. 1968. The Stranger, the Guest and the Hostile Host: Introduction to the Study of the Laws of Hospitality. In Contributions to Mediterranean Sociology: Mediterranean Rural Communities and Social Change (ed.) J.-G. Peristiany1330. Paris: Mouton. [Reprinted in 2012 as: The Law of Hospitality. HAU 2(1)].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RoseM. & N. Wadham-Smith. 2004. Mutuality Trust and Cultural Relations. British Council: Counterpoint.

  • RyanK. 2008. On Power, Habitus, and (In)civility: Foucault meets Elias meets Bauman in the Playground. Journal of Power 1(3): 251274.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SehlikogluS. & A. Zengin. 2015. Introduction: Why Revisit Intimacy? The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 33(2): 2025.

  • SubediB. 2006. Theorizing a ‘Halfie’ Researcher’s Identity in Transnational Fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19(5): 573593.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SuboticJ. & A. Zarabol. 2013. Cultural Intimacy in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 19(4): 915938.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SzostekJ. 2014. Russia and the News Media in Ukraine: A Case of ‘Soft Power’? East European Politics and Societies 28: 463486.

  • Tsygankov A.P. 2006. If Not by Tanks, Then by Banks? The Role of Soft Power in Putin’s Foreign Policy. Europe-Asia Studies 58(7): 10791099.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TwymanC.J. Morrison & D. Sporton. 1999. The Final Fifth: Autobiography, Reflexivity and Interpretation in Cross-Cultural Research. Area 31(4): 313325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WalkerC. 2011. Positionality and Difference in Cross-Cultural Youth Research: Being ‘Other’ in the Former Soviet Union. In Innovations in Youth Research (eds) S. Heath & C. Walker210228. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WhiteM. 2006. An Ambivalent Civility. The Canadian Journal of Sociology 31(4): 445460.

  • WickströmD-E. & Y.B. Steinholt. 2009. Visions of the (Holy) Motherland in Contemporary Russian Popular Music: Nostalgia, Patriotism, Religion, and Russkii Rok. Popular Music and Society 32(3): 31330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation