Corrective Capacities

From Unruly Politics to Democratic Capacitación

in The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology
Restricted access

Abstract

Foreign aid programmes have long targeted Bolivia for ‘capacity building’ at the level of institutional democratic channels and the state legal system. By contrast, this article examines a shift in donor priorities from reforming public institutions to workshops targeting interpersonal and social communication through capacitación or skill-set building aimed at changing individual behaviour and values. I argue that the conversatorio – or model dialogue – is the quintessential space of capacitación towards those ends. Yet, as I show, conversatorios also become a space of contestation as participants challenge not only the framing of political issues, but also the very techniques of negotiation, deliberation and political subject formation proposed in these ‘capacity building’ spaces. Conversatorios unmask competing political stakes and expectations of state–citizen relations as sceptical participants revalorize demonized capacities.

Contributor Notes

Susan Ellison is an Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Wellesley College, Massachusetts. She recently published ‘Replicate, Facilitate, Disseminate: The Micropolitics of US Democracy Promotion in Bolivia’ (PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 2015).

  • BrennerN.J. Peck and N. Theodore. 2010. ‘Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways’. Global Networks 10 (2): 182222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrownK. 2006. Transacting Transition: The Micropolitics of Democracy Assistance in the Former Yugoslavia. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, Inc.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ColesK. 2008. ‘International Presence: The Passive Work of Democracy Promotion’. In J. Paley (ed.) Democracy: Anthropological Approaches. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press98129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DomingoP. and R. Sieder (eds). 2001. Rule of Law in Latin America: The International Promotion of Judicial Reform. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EadeD. 2007. ‘Capacity Building: Who Builds Whose Capacity?Development in Practice 17 (4): 630639.

  • EllisonS. 2015. ‘Replicate, Facilitate, Disseminate: The Micropolitics of US Democracy Promotion in Bolivia’. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 38 (2): 318337.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FoucaultM. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.

  • GustafsonB. 2009. New Languages of the State: Indigenous Resurgence and the Politics of Knowledge in Bolivia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HabermasJ. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Trans. McCarthy Thomas. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HolstonJ. 2008. Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Indaburu QuintanaR. 2004. ‘Evaluación de la Ciudad de el Alto’. Contract 511-O-00-04-00047-00 USAID.

  • KennyS. and M. Clarke. 2010. Challenging Capacity Building: Comparative Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • LazarS. 2008. El Alto Rebel City: Self and Citizenship in Andean Bolivia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • McNeishJ.-A. 2008. ‘Constitutionalism in an Insurgent State: Rethinking Legal Empowerment of the Poor in a Divided Bolivia’. In D. Banik (ed.) Rights and Legal Empowerment in Eradicating Poverty. London: Ashgate6996.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MuhlbergerP. 2011. ‘A Deliberative Look at Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Rule of Law’. Journal of Dispute Resolution 1: 147163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NaderL. 2004. ‘Civilization and its Negotiations’. In S. Falk Moore (ed.) Law and Anthropology: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing330343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OrtaA. 2013. ‘Forged Communities and Vulgar Citizens: Autonomy and its Limits in Semineoliberal Bolivia’. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 18 (1): 108133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PaleyJ. 2008. ‘Introduction’. In J. Paley (ed.) Democracy: Anthropological Approaches. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PenaJJ.L. Guasch and A. Escribano. 2000. Reforming Public Institutions and Strengthening Governance: A World Bank Strategy. The World Bank. Public Sector Group. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management (PREM) Network. [Available online at http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/Reforming.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PosteroN. 2007. Now We Are Citizens: Indigenous Politics in Postmulticultural Bolivia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • RilesA. 2002. ‘User Friendly: Informality and Expertise: [Commentary]’. Law & Social Inquiry 27 (3): 613619.

  • RowatM.W. Malik and M. Dakolias. 1995. ‘Judicial Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean’. World Bank Technical Paper No. 280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SandersL. 1997. ‘Against Deliberation’. Political Theory 25 (3): 347376.

  • ShoreC. and S. Wright. 2011. ‘Conceptualising Policy: Technologies of Governance and the Politics of Visibility’. In C. ShoreS. Wright and D. Però (eds) Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TrnkaS. and C. Trundle. 2014. ‘Competing Responsibilities: Moving beyond Neoliberal Responsibilisation’. Anthropological Forum 24 (2): 136153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 23 23 18
Full Text Views 57 57 0
PDF Downloads 6 6 0