Decolonizing the African Studies Centre

in The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology
Author:
Adam Branch University of Cambridge arb209@cam.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Adam Branch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The African Studies Centre has been a privileged institutional form in Britain for knowledge production on Africa since the end of colonialism. This article argues that the origin of these UK centres should be located in the colonial research institutes established in Africa, in particular the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute and the East African Institute of Social Research. Attention to the knowledge about Africa that was deemed authoritative by these institutes as well as to the institutions and structures underpinning that knowledge production can raise important questions about today’s centres that need to be addressed as part of a decolonization agenda.

Contributor Notes

Adam Branch is Director of the Centre of African Studies at the University of Cambridge, where he is also University Lecturer in the Department of Politics and International Studies and Fellow of Trinity Hall. Prior to joining Cambridge, he was Senior Research Fellow at the Makerere Institute of Social Research in Kampala, Uganda. He is the author of two books: Africa Uprising: Popular Protest and Political Change (Zed Books, 2015, co-authored with Zachariah Mampilly) and Displacing Human Rights: War and Intervention in Northern Uganda (Oxford University Press, 2011). He is a series editor for African Arguments and for the Cambridge Centre of African Studies book series. He is also the director of the Cambridge Philomathia Africa Programme and the Chair of the Cambridge Consortium for the Global South.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Adi, H. 1998. West Africans in Britain 1900–1960: Nationalism, Pan-Africanism and Communism. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

  • Adomako Ampofo, A. 2016. ‘Re-viewing Studies on Africa, #Black Lives Matter, and Envisioning the Future of African Studies’. African Studies Review 59 (2): 729.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Amin, S. 2010. Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

  • Brown, R. 1973. ‘Anthropology and Colonial Rule: Godfrey Wilson and the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute’. In T. Asad (ed.), Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. New York: Humanities Press, 173198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bundy, C. 2002. ‘Continuing a Conversation: Prospects for African Studies in the 21st Century’. African Affairs 101: 6173.

  • Cooper, F. 2002. Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Crehan, K. 1997. The Fractured Community: Landscapes of Power and Gender in Rural Zambia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • East African Institute of Social Research’. 1951. Sudan Notes and Records 32 (1): 151153.

  • Fage, J. D. 1989. ‘British African Studies since the Second World War: A Personal Account’. African Affairs 88 (352): 397413.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fanon, F. 1965. Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.

  • Ferguson, J. 1999. Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gilroy, P. 1993. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Gluckman, M. 1940. ‘Analysis of a Social Situation in Modern Zululand’. Bantu Studies 14 (1): 130.

  • Hailey, W. M. 1938. An African Survey: A Study of Problems arising in Africa South of the Sahara. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hall, S. 2017. The Fateful Triangle: Race, Ethnicity, Nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Harrison, G. 2013. The African Presence: Representations of Africa in the Construction of Britishness. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Killingray, D. 2000. ‘Colonial Studies’. In D. Rimmer and A. Kirk-Greene (eds), The British Intellectual Engagement with Africa in the Twentieth Century. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 4167.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirk-Greene, A. 2000. ‘The Emergence of an Africanist Community in the UK’. In D. Rimmer and A. Kirk-Greene (eds), The British Intellectual Engagement with Africa in the Twentieth Century. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1140.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kuper, A. 1999. Among the Anthropologists. London: Athlone Press.

  • Lindqvist, S. 1992. Exterminate all the Brutes. New York: New Press.

  • Lonsdale, J. 2005. ‘African Studies, Europe & Africa’. Afrika Spectrum 40 (3): 377402.

  • Macamo, E. 2018. ‘Urbane Scholarship: Studying Africa, Understanding the World’. Africa 88 (1): 110.

  • Mafeje, A. 1971. ‘The Ideology of Tribalism’. Journal of Modern African Studies 9 (2): 253261.

  • Mafeje, A. 1997. ‘Who Are the Makers and Objects of Anthropology? A Critical Comment on Sally Falk Moore’s “Anthropology and Africa”’. African Sociological Review 1 (1): 115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Magubane, B. 1971. ‘A Critical Look at Indices Used in the Study of Social Change in Colonial Africa’. Current Anthropology 12 (4/5): 419445.

  • Mama, A. 2007. ‘Is it Ethical to Study Africa? Preliminary Thoughts on Scholarship and Freedom’. African Studies Review 50 (1): 126.

  • Mamdani, M. 1996. Citizen and Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Mamdani, M. 2016. ‘Between the Public Intellectual and the Scholar: Decolonization and Some Post-Independence Initiatives in African Higher Education’. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 17 (1): 6883.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martin, W. and M. West (eds). 1999. Out of One, Many Africas: Reconstructing the Study and Meaning of Africa. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mavhunga, C. C. 2017. What Do Science, Technology, and Innovation Mean from Africa? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Mbalibulha, S. B. B. 2013. ‘The History of Makerere Institute of Social Research (MISR) and Her Place in the Study of the Social Sciences in Africa’. Journal of Higher Education in Africa (IHEA/RESA) 11 (1–2): 121142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mbembe, A. 2017. Critique of Black Reason. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • McCracken, J. 2007. ‘New Directions in African Studies in the United Kingdom’. In P. T. Zeleza (ed.), Study of Africa: Volume 2: Global and Transnational Engagements. Dakar: CODESRIA, 146156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mills, D. 2002. ‘British Anthropology at the End of Empire: The Rise and Fall of the Colonial Social Science Research Council, 1944–1962’. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 6 (1): 16188.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mills, D. 2006. ‘How Not to Be a “Government House Pet”: Audrey Richards and the East African Institute for Social Research’. In M. Ntarangwi, D. Mills and M. Babiker (eds), African Anthropologies: History, Critique and Practice. London/Dakar: Zed/CODESRIA, 7698.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mudimbe, V. Y. 1988. The Invention of Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Mutua, M. 2001. ‘Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights’. Harvard International Law Journal 42 (1): 20145.

  • Ntarangwi, M., D. Mills and M. Babiker. 2006. African Anthropologies: History, Critique and Practice. London/Dakar: Zed/CODESRIA.

  • Ntsebeza, L. 2016. ‘What Can We Learn from Archie Mafeje about the Road to Democracy in South Africa?Development and Change 47 (4): 918936.

  • Nugent, P. 2009. ‘Critical African Studies: A Voluntarist Manifesto’. Critical African Studies 1 (1): 119.

  • Pierre, J. 2012. The Predicament of Blackness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Richards, A. 1944. ‘Practical Anthropology in the Lifetime of the International African Institute’. Africa 14 (6): 289301.

  • Richards, A. 1967. ‘Presidential Address’. African Affairs 66 (262): 4054.

  • Robinson, P. T. 2007. ‘Area Studies in Search of Africa: The Case of the United States’. In P. T. Zeleza (ed.), Study of Africa: Volume 2: Global and Transnational Engagements. Dakar: CODESRIA, 235276.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schumaker, L. 2001. Africanizing Anthropology: Fieldwork Networks and the Making of Cultural Knowledge in Central Africa. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson, G. 1940. ‘Anthropology as a Public Service’. Africa 13 (1): 4361.

  • Zeleza, P. T. 1997. Manufacturing African Studies and Crises. Dakar: CODESRIA.

  • Zeleza, P. T. (ed.). 2007. Study of Africa: Volume 2: Global and Transnational Engagements. Dakar: CODESRIA.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1070 336 43
Full Text Views 247 25 2
PDF Downloads 237 37 0