Purchase this article
USD $22.00
Nagas as a ‘Society against Voting?’
Consensus-Building, Party-less Politics and a Culturalist Critique of Elections in Northeast India
in The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology
Abstract
Interrogating the normative notion of ‘man the voter’, this article draws on ethnography among the Chakhesang Naga in Northeast India to communicate a cosmopolitan, culturalist critique – and an answer to this critique – of liberal democracy’s hallmark of party-based elections, individual autonomy and equal voting rights. While Nagas have been decorated as ‘traditional democrats’, their sense of the good political life is shaped by values of communal harmony, consensus-building and complimentary coexistence. However, these are threatened by practices and principles of liberal democracy, which led Phugwumi villagers to attempt a procedural adaptation of elections by substituting individual voting for consensus-building and the selection of a leader. I use this ethnographic case to provincialize the sprawling contemporary sense of ‘liberal universalism’, and to postulate that, in their political sociality, Nagas are a ‘society against voting’, an adaptation of Society against the State.
Contributor Notes
Jelle J. P. Wouters is a Senior Lecturer at Royal Thimphu College, Bhutan. Previously he taught at Sikkim Central University and was a visiting fellow at Eberhard Karls University on a ‘Teaching for Excellence’ award granted by the German Research Foundation. He is the author of In the Shadows of Naga Insurgency: Tribes, State, and Violence in Northeast India (Oxford University Press, 2018).