In this article, I critically discuss the ambiguous notion of ‘discipline’ and the related constructions
of inter-, multi-, post-disciplinarity, from an ‘epistemic’ and ‘socio-political’ point of view.
Particularly, I focus on the role of ‘power’ and ‘authority’, and on the consequences that follow
by assuming a ‘foundationalist’ or ‘post-foundationalist’ approach. Next, assuming a ‘Critical
Theory’ perspective, I try to rethink the meaning of a ‘critical activity’ able to generate a real
social and epistemic change. I contend that a new discipline of thought is needed, rather than
new disciplines, and a new personal attitude, not only engaged in mere procedures of recording
“facts”, but characterised by a serious concern for the role of generalization or theory. A ‘crossing
homeless’ attitude is proposed, that is at the same time theoretical, intellectual and practical,
concerning the ‘unreasonable’ discipline of a critical activity aimed at putting culture in circle
(‘encyclopaideia’) by systematically discontinuing events of subjectifi cation.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.