Reply to Hugo Slim

in Volume 6 (2018): Issue 2 (Dec 2018)
Restricted access

Responding to Hugo Slim’s critique, John Dunn defends his notion of the “Epoch of Revolution.” The response advances that this protracted epoch was defined by the unique way in which the category of revolution itself defined key possibilities for collective political, social, and economic transformation. In doing so, Dunn argues, this category transformed the conditions of political action across a large part of the world. Dunn classifies Slim’s cases as instances of rebellion that, though significant and important, do not share the teleological character of revolution.

Contention

The Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Protest

in Volume 6 (2018): Issue 2 (Dec 2018)