Purchase this article
USD $22.00
Fragmentation in International Law and Global Governance
A Conceptual Inquiry
in Contributions to the History of Concepts
Author:
and
Timo Pankakoski
Timo Pankakoski
University of Turku timo.j.pankakoski@jyu.fi
Search for other papers by Timo Pankakoski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Timo Pankakoski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Antto Vihma
Antto Vihma
Finnish Institute of International Affairs antto.vihma@fiia.fi
Search for other papers by Antto Vihma in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antto Vihma in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
USD $0.01
All currencies in US Dollar
ABSTRACT
This article examines the concept and metaphor of fragmentation and its underlying assumptions in international law and global governance. After engaging with fragmentation historically, we analyze current debates through five conceptual perspectives. Fragmentation is often perceived as a process, a gradation, a process with a single direction, a prognosis, and normatively as either loss or liberation. These interlinked tendencies carry conceptual implications, such as making fragmentation apparently inevitable or provoking positive revaluations of fragmentation in terms of differentiation. Furthermore, the conceptual coupling of fragmentation with modernity enhances these effects with an historical thesis. Consequently,fragmentation appears as a ubiquitous and necessary, rather than contingent, feature of modern law—a conceptual implication that may hinder empirical work, and that merits critical analysis.