Does Conceptual History Really Need a Theory of Historical Times?

in Contributions to the History of Concepts
Author:
Helge Jordheim University of Oslo helge.jordheim@ikos.uio.no

Search for other papers by Helge Jordheim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The article singles out one dimension of the history of concepts in general and of Koselleck’s work in particular, the “theory of historical times,” which at present is both contested and simply overlooked. After discussing some of the arguments for and against the necessity of such a theory for the practice of conceptual history, the article moves on to suggest an alternative context for grasping its originality, the so-called linguistic turn, manifest in French structuralist thought and especially in the works of Michel Foucault. In Koselleck’s works key structuralist ideas like structure and the diachronicsynchronic opposition are developed in ways that open them to questions of historicity and multiple times.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 778 277 9
Full Text Views 124 15 1
PDF Downloads 188 19 2