Nathaniel Lee’s Politics of Sovereignty

in Critical Survey
Author:
Aspasia VelissariouNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece abelis@enl.uoa.gr

Search for other papers by Aspasia Velissariou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

This article explores the chaotic violence in Nathaniel Lee’s tragedies, which, while clearly originating in the sovereign, by its sheer excess and blindness, is hypostasised as a motor of history. In Lee, violence is a reflection of the political anxieties surrounding the Exclusion Crisis but it is also intrinsic to the way he understands the nature of political life; in reality, it is constitutive of the very exercise of power. Drawing on Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer I argue that sovereign violence is inscribed in a most savage form as the very foundation of the civil community, and, therefore, its autonomisation, as in Lee’s early plays, is only apparent. In Lucius Junius Brutus: Father of His Country (1680) the extreme sovereign assault on human life fully discloses its politically defined character because it is emblematically performed in the name of the institution of a new body politic, the Republic.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 224 223 18
Full Text Views 47 47 3
PDF Downloads 18 18 4