Shakespeare's Sonnet 145 and the Challenges of Legacy Criticism

in Critical Survey
Author:
Shaun James Russell Senior Lecturer, Ohio State University, USA

Search for other papers by Shaun James Russell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This article re-evaluates the merits of Shakespeare's Sonnet 145 and explores its critical legacy over the past half-century. While the sonnet has typically been seen as inferior due to its use of tetrameter rather than pentameter, one article from 1971 made a case for it being the first poem Shakespeare ever wrote. Rather than prompt critical debate, the theory presented in the article gained nearly universal acceptance and has been amplified ever since. The problem I identify is that the theory itself has been adopted without due scrutiny, and that when we approach Sonnet 145 from the standpoint that it is neither inferior nor juvenilia, we can then see how the supposed aberrations are potentially deliberate choices made by Shakespeare to underscore the poem's content.

Contributor Notes

Shaun James Russell is a Senior Lecturer at the Ohio State University, working in the field of early modern British literature, with a particular focus on poetry and book history. His previous work has been published in George Herbert Journal, and he has presented on topics related to Shakespeare, Herbert, Milton, and Katherine Philips among others at conferences such as SCSC and RSA. His current research interests engage in intersections of publication, intention, and the transmission and reception histories of early modern poems and collections.

  • Collapse
  • Expand