Democracies and Their Crises Reconsidered

in Democratic Theory
Author:
Wolfgang Merkel Humboldt University wolfgang.merkel@wzb.eu

Search for other papers by Wolfgang Merkel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Jean-Paul Gagnon University of Canberra Jean-Paul.Gagnon@canberra.edu.au

Search for other papers by Jean-Paul Gagnon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Editors’ introduction to the interview

Democracy, says Wolfgang Merkel, is not in as deep of an acute crisis as many today think it to be. An examination, for example, of OECD democracies over the last 50 years does not reveal democracy’s wholesale crisis but rather crises in certain sectors of democracy – ones that change over time as the state institutions affected by crises adapt to them and in some manner resolve them. Take, for instance, the improvements made in Western democracies to civil liberties, women in business and parliaments, gay rights, and the protection of minorities. These improvements happened in the last 50 years. Almost simultaneously, however, almost all established democracies developed a crisis with globalized capital that blackmails its governments with the threat of capital flight and a crisis with economic inequality which has resulted in approximately the poorest 1/3rd of most democratic societies dropping-out of each form of political participation. Merkel’s reconsideration of the crisis of democracy reveals that democracies can decline and improve at the same time because crises are sectoral.

Contributor Notes

Wolfgang Merkel is the director for the research unit “Democracy: Structures, Performance, Challenges” at the Social Science Research Centre Berlin (WZB); and professor of Political Science at the Humboldt University in Berlin. His research focuses on political regimes, democracy and democratization, parties and party systems, comparative public policy, and reform of the welfare state.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Democratic Theory

An Interdisciplinary Journal

  • Bang, Henrik, and Eva Sørensen. 1999. “The Everyday Maker: A New Challenge to Democratic Governance.” Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21 (3): 325341.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barber, Benjamin. 2003. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  • Benhabib, Seyla. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bühlmann, Marc, Wolfgang Merkel, Lisa Müller, Bernhard Weßels (2012): The Democracy Barometer. A New Instrument to Measure the Quality of Democracy and Its Potential for Comparative Research, European Political Science 11: 519536.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chou, Mark. 2013. Theorising Democide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Crouch, Colin. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Dewey, John. 2004. Democracy and Education. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

  • Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

  • Dryzek, John. 2005. “Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia.” Political Theory 33 (2): 218242.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Easton, David. 1957. “An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems.” World Politics, 9 (3): 383400.

  • Ercan, Selen, and Jean-Paul Gagnon. 2014. “The Crisis of Democracy: Which Crisis? Which Democracy?Democratic Theory 1 (2): 110.

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalisation of Democracy. London: Profile Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gagnon, Jean-Paul, and Mark Chou. 2014. “Why Democratic Theory?Democratic Theory 1 (1): 18.

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. “What Does a Crisis Mean Today? Legitimation Problems in Late Capitalism.” Social Research 40 (4): 643667.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keane, John. 2009. The Life and Death of Democracy. New York: Simon and Schuster.

  • Keane, John. 2013. Democracy and Media Decadence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Keane, John. 2015a. “Francis Fukuyama’s Political Order and Political Decay.” The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/francis-fukuyamas-political-order-and-political-decay-37882 (accessed 7 May 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keane, John. 2015b. “Die neuen Despotien. Vorstellungen vom Ende der Demokratie [The New Despotisms: Ideas about the End of Democracy].” Merkur 790: 1831.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koselleck, Reinhart. 1988. Critique and Crisis. Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2015. “The Myth of Democracy Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 4558.

  • Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2000. “The Third Ways of Social Democracy into the 21st Century.” Presentation at the 3rd Roundtable on Human Rights and Peace on “The Third Ways of Social Democracy and Social Movement,” Seoul, 26 June. http://www.unisosdem.org/images/3rd_ways-merkel.pdf (accessed 27 April 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2004. “Embedded and Defective Democracies.” Democratization 11 (5): 3358.

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2014a. “‘Crisis of Democracy’: Analytical Concept or Empty Signifier?Paper presented at the 8th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Glasgow, 4–7 September.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2014b. “Is Capitalism Compatible with Democracy?Comparative Governance and Politics 8 (2): 109128.

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2014c. “Is There a Crisis of Democracy?Democratic Theory 1 (2): 1125.

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2015. Demokratie und Krise: Zum Schwierigen Verhältnis von Theorie und Empirie [Democracy and Crisis: Its Complex Relationship between Theory and Empiricism]. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, Thomas. 2007. The Theory of Social Democracy. Oxford: Polity.

  • Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • O’Connor, James. 1973. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St Martin’s Press.

  • Offe, Claus. 1976. “‘Crisis of Crisis Management’: Elements of a Political Crisis Theory.” International Journal of Politics 6 (3): 2967.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pogrebinschi, Thamy, and David Samuels. 2014. “The Impact of Participatory Democracy: Evidence from Brazil’s National Public Policy Conferences.” Comparative Politics 46 (3): 313332.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosanvallon, Pierre, and Jean-Paul Gagnon. 2014. “Certain Turns of Modernity in Democratic Theory.” Pp. 117130 in Jean-Paul Gagnon, Democratic Theorists in Conversation: Turns in Contemporary Thought. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schmidt, Vivien A. 2013. “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output, and ‘Throughput.’Political Studies 61 (1): 222.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schumpeter, Joseph. 2013. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Tormey, Simon, and Ramón A. Feenstra. 2014. “New Social Movements and Democracy in the Spanish Context: A Conversation with Simon Tormey.” Dilemata 6 (15): 377390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Varieties of Democracy. 2015. “V-Dem: Global Standards, Local Knowledge.” https://v-dem.net/.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 4628 3400 349
Full Text Views 54 5 0
PDF Downloads 29 6 0