The Deliberative Potential of Facultative Referendums

Procedure and Substance in Direct Democracy

in Democratic Theory
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Zurich alice.el-wakil@zda.uzh.ch
Restricted access

Abstract:

Deliberative democracy theorists have long dismissed direct democratic mechanisms, suspecting them of fundamentally contradicting the deliberative ideal. One reason for this dismissal is that, as aggregative devices, all direct democratic institutions would implement a purely procedural view of democracy deemed undesirable. In this article, I contest this objection to all direct democratic procedures by showing that one of them, namely, the facultative referendum, corresponds to Joshua Cohen’s definition of substantive democracy. Moreover, because it introduces uncertainty in the democratic system and replaces hypothetical with actual acceptance of reasons, the facultative referendum gives political actors strong incentives to think in terms of acceptable justifications and can screen outcomes that fit the three principles of Cohen’s deliberative ideal. These findings should encourage deliberative democracy theorists to further develop tools to inform the design and assessment of the growing number of popular votes around the world and ultimately enhance their democratic quality.

Contributor Notes

Alice el-Wakil is a doctoral candidate in Political Theory at the Centre for Democracy Studies in Aarau (ZDA) of the University of Zurich.

Democratic Theory

An Interdisciplinary Journal

  • Anderson, Elizabeth. 2009. “Democracy: Instrumental vs. Non-instrumental Value.” Pp. 213227 in Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy, ed. Thomas Christiano and John Christman. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bächtiger, André, Simon Niemeyer, Michael Neblo, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Jürg Steiner. 2010. “Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 3263.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bagg, Samuel, and Jack Knight. 2014. “Legitimacy.” Pp. 20792090 in The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, ed. Michael Gibbons, Diana Coole, Elisabeth Ellis and Kennan Ferguson. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bellamy, Richard. 2007. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Budge, Ian. 1996. The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

  • Chambers, Simone. 1998. “Contract or Conversation? Theoretical Lessons from the Canadian Constitutional Crisis.Politics & Society 26 (1): 143172.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chambers, Simone. 2009. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?Political Theory 37 (2): 323350.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chambers, Simone. 2010. “Theories of Political Justification.” Philosophy Compass 5 (11): 893903.

  • Christiano, Thomas. 2003a. “Introduction.” Pp. 316 in Philosophy and Democracy: An Anthology, ed. Thomas Christiano. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” Pp. 1734 in The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, ed. Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohen, Joshua. 1997. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” Pp. 407437 in Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohen, Joshua, and Charles Sabel. 1997. “Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy.” European Law Journal 3 (4): 313342.

  • Curato, Nicole, and Marit Böker. 2016. “Linking Mini-Publics to the Deliberative System: A Research Agenda.” Policy Sciences 49 (2): 173190.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dryzek, John S. 2016. “Symposium Commentary: Reflections on the Theory of Deliberative Systems.” Critical Policy Studies 10 (2): 209215.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Elstub, Stephen, and Jean-Paul Gagnon. 2015. “A Genealogy of Deliberative Democracy.” Democratic Theory 3 (2): 100117.

  • Elstub, Stephen, Selen Ercan, and Ricardo Fabrino Mendonça. 2016. “The Fourth Generation of Deliberative Democracy.” Critical Policy Studies 10 (2): 139151.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Felicetti, Andrea, Simon Niemeyer, and Nicole Curato. 2016. “Improving Deliberative Participation: Connecting Mini-Publics to Deliberative Systems.” European Political Science Review 8 (3): 427448.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gastil, John, and Robert Richards. 2013. “Making Direct Democracy Deliberative through Random Assemblies.” Politics & Society 41 (2): 253281.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gastil, John, Robert Richards, and Katherine Knobloch. 2014. “Vicarious Deliberation: How the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review Influenced Deliberation in Mass Elections.” International Journal of Communication 8 (January): 6289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gledhill, James. 2015. “The Ideal and Reality of Epistemic Proceduralism.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy online first: 122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goodin, Robert E. 1996. “Institutionalizing the Public Interest: The Defense of Deadlock and Beyond.” The American Political Science Review 90 (2): 331343.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1999. “Democratic Disagreement.” Pp. 243279 in Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Stephen Macedo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2009. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.Communication Theory 16 (4): 411426.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hug, Simon. 2008. “Some Thoughts about Referendums, Representative Democracy, and Separation of Powers.” Constitutional Political Economy 20 (3–4): 251266.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knight, Jack. 1999. “Constitutionalism and Deliberative Democracy.” Pp. 159169 in Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Stephen Macedo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knight, Jack, and James Johnson. 1994. “Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy.” Political Theory 22 (2): 277296.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leemann, Lucas, and Fabio Wasserfallen. 2016. “The Democratic Effect of Direct Democracy.” American Political Science Review 110 (4): 750762.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leib, Ethan J. 2006. “Can Direct Democracy Be Made Deliberative?Buffalo Law Review 54 (October): 903925.

  • Leuenberger, Moritz. 2014. “Schafft sich die Demokratie selber ab?Paper presented at the Zentrum für Demokratie Aarau (ZDA), 6 December. http://www.zdaarau.ch/dokumente/de/news/Referat_Leuenberger.pdf (accessed May 4 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manin, Bernard. 1987. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Trans. Elly Stein and Jane Mansbridge. Political Theory 15 (3): 338368.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis Thompson, and Mark E. Warren. 2012. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” Pp. 126 in Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, ed. John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martí Mármol, José Luis. 2005. “The Sources of Legitimacy of Political Decisions: Between Procedure and Substance.” Pp. 259281 in The Theory and Practice of Legislation: Essays in Legisprudence, ed. Luc J. Wintgens. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Masmejan, Denis. 2013. “C’est un pas dans le sens du respect de la volonté populaire.” LeTemps.ch, 22 May. http://www.letemps.ch/suisse/2013/05/22/c-un-sens-respect-volonte-populaire (accessed September 20 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Owen, David, and Graham Smith. 2015. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.” Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2): 213234.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parkinson, John. 2009. “Beyond ‘Technique’: The Role of Referendums in the Deliberative System.” Paper presented to the Referendums and Deliberative Democracy Workshop, 8 May, University of Edinburgh. http://ow.ly/i4V2309H1lQ (accessed August 3 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parkinson, John. 2012. “Democratizing Deliberative Systems.” Pp. 151172 in Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, ed. John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peter, Fabienne. 2014. “Political Legitimacy.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/legitimacy/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pettit, Philip. 1999. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Pettit, Philip. 2004. “Depoliticizing Democracy.Ratio Juris 17 (1): 5265.

  • Saward, Michael. 2001a. “Making Democratic Connections: Political Equality, Deliberation and Direct Democracy.” Acta Politica 36 (4): 361379.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saward, Michael. 2001b. “Reconstructing Democracy: Current Thinking and New Directions.” Government and Opposition 36 (4): 599581.

  • Sciarini, Pascal, and Alexandre H. Trechsel. 1996. “Démocratie directe en Suisse: L’élite politique victime des droits populaires.” Swiss Political Science Review 2 (2): 135.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sen, Amartya. 2004. “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (4): 315356. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00017.x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Setälä, Maija. 2006. “On the Problems of Responsibility and Accountability in Referendums.” European Journal of Political Research, June, 699721.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steenbergen, Marco. 2009. “Deliberative Politics in Switzerland.” Pp. 283301 in Demokratie als Leidenschaft: Planung, Entscheidung und Vollzug in der schweizerischen Demokratie, ed. Adrian Vatter, Frédéric Varone, and Fritz Sager. Bern: Haupt.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stojanovic, Nenad. 2009. “Afraid of Direct Democracy? A Reply to Critics.” Pp. 357360 in Is Democracy Viable without a Unified Public Opinion? The Swiss Experience and the Belgian Case, ed. Dave Sinardet and Marc Hooghe. Brussels: Re-Bel e-books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trechsel, Alexander H. 2010. “Reflexive Accountability and Direct Democracy.” West European Politics 33 (5): 10501064.

  • Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Urbinati, Nadia, and Mark E. Warren. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 387412.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Young, Iris Marion. 2001. “Asymmetrical Reciprocity: On Moral Respect, Wonder, and Enlarged Thought.” Pp. 205228 in Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt, ed. Ronald Beiner and Jennifer Nedelsky. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 54 54 15
Full Text Views 8 8 0
PDF Downloads 6 6 0