Facts and Norms in Democratization

in Democratic Theory
View More View Less
  • 1 Free University of Bozen/Bolzano rfarneti@unibz.it
Restricted access

Abstract:

The literature on democratization uses measures of either ethnic fractionalization or polarization in empirical analyses on the causes of democratic regress; some authors have argued that either of the two complicates democratization. This article detects a conceptual puzzle in this use of the two concepts: when we shift the attention from fractionalization to polarization we are not simply moving along a continuum but rather making an epistemic leap from facts to normative problems. But to treat the relation between a descriptive account of a state of affairs and a normative status as a continuum is a fallacy that remains unaddressed in this literature. This article exposes the limits of analyses that remove normative considerations from the big picture of dynamics of democratization and that narrow their focus to case histories of democratic development. It pleas for a return to normative insight and interdisciplinary dialogue.

Contributor Notes

Roberto Farneti is Associate Professor of Political Science at the Free University of Bozen/Bolzano in northern Italy and a former fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation at the J. W. Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main. He published extensively on Hobbes (in the Pacific Philosophical Quarterly and in the Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, Cambridge UP) and on a variety of issues in political theory, with articles published in journals such as the Cambridge Review of International Affairs, History of Political Thought, Polity, and the Review of Politics. E-mail: rfarneti@unibz.it

Democratic Theory

An Interdisciplinary Journal

  • Abramowitz, Alan I., and Steven Webster. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41 (1): 1222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alesina, Alberto, Arnaud Devleeschauwer, William Easterly, Sergio Kurlat, and Romain Wacziarg. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 155194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baldassarri, Delia, and Andrew Gelman. 2008. “Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.” American Journal of Sociology 114 (2): 408446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bishop, Bill. 2009. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Boston: Mariner Books.

  • Booth, Alan. 1985. “Quality of Children’s Family Interaction in Relation to Residential Type and Household Crowding.” In Habitats for Children: Impacts of Density, ed. John Wohlwilland and Willem VanVliet, 145164. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bose, Sumantra 2010. Contested Lands: Israel-Palestine, Kashmir, Bosnia, Cyprus, and Sri Lanka. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Brighi, Elisabetta, and Antonio Cerella, 2016. The Sacred and the Political: Explorations on Mimesis, Violence and Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Busse. 2015. “Die Mitte verliert.” In Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. January 30, 2015.

  • Caramani, Daniele. ed. 2008. Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Carey, Sabine. 2002. “A Comparative Analysis of Political Parties in Kenya, Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo.Democratization 9 (3): 5371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Casey, Gregory P. and Owen, Ann L. 2014. “Inequality and Fractionalization.” In World Development (56), pp. 3250.

  • Chua, Amy. 2003. World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability. New York: Doubleday.

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 2006. Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for a New Political Debate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Edwards, Harry T., and Michael A. Livermore. 2009. “Pitfalls of Empirical Studies that Attempt to Understand the Factors Affecting Appellate Decisionmaking.Duke Law Journal 58 (8): 18951989.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Epstein, Lee, and Gary King. 2002. “The Rules of Inference.” University of Chicago Law Review (69) 1: 1133.

  • Farneti, Roberto. 2015. Mimetic Politics: Dyadic Patterns in Global Politics. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

  • Fish, M. Steven, and Matthew Kroenig. 2006. “Diversity, Conflict and Democracy: Some Evidence from Eurasia and East Europe.Democratization 13 (5): 828842.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frye, Timothy. 2010. Building States and Markets after Communism: The Perils of Polarized Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fuchs, Barbara. 2001. Mimesis and Empires: The New World, Islam, and European Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Girard, René. 2010. Battling to the End: Conversations with Benoît Chantre. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

  • Graham, Loren, and Wolf Lepenies. 1983. Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories. Boston: Kluwer.

  • Gunitsky, Seva. 2014. “From Shocks to Waves: Hegemonic Transitions and Democratization in the Twentieth Century.International Organization 68 (3): 561597.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman Robert R. 2016. “Democratization During the Third Wav.” In Annual Review of Political Science (19): pp. 125144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansen, Lene, and Ole Wæver. 2002. European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States. London: Routledge.

  • Hetherington, Marc J., and Thomas Rudolph. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hetherington, Marc J., and Jonathan D. Weiler. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hinnebusch, Raymond. 2006. “Authoritarian persistence, democratization theory and the Middle East: An overview and critique.” In Democratization, 13:3, 373395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1994 (1651). Leviathan. Edited by E. Curley. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

  • Iyengar, Shanto, Guarav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology.Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405431.

  • Jensen, Carsten, and Svend-Erik Skaaning. 2012. “Modernization, Ethnic Fractionalization, and Democracy.Democratization 19 (6): 11171137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2003. Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence, 3d ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lemke, Douglas, and William Reed. 2001. “The Relevance of Politically Relevant Dyads.Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (1): 126144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Montalvo, José Garcia, and Marta Reynal-Querol. 2005. “Ethnic Polarization, Potential Conflict, and Civil Wars.” American Economic Review 95 (3): 796816.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCarty, Nolan, Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2008. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Boston: MIT Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McDowell, John. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Nishizaka, Aug. 2015. “Facts and Normative Connections: Two Different Worldviews.Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (1): 2631.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pettit, Philip. 1993. The Common Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Pluye, Pierre, Roland Grad, Alissa Levine, and Belinda Nicolau. 2009. “Understanding Divergence of Quantitative and Qualitative Data (or Results) in Mixed Methods Studies.International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 3 (1): 5872.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Raz, Joseph. 1999. “Explaining Normativity: On Rationality and the Justification of Reason.” In Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action, 6789. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sekulic, Dusko, Garth Massey, and Randy Hodson. 1994. “Who Were the Yugoslavs? Failed Sources of a Common Identity in the Former Yugoslavia.” American Sociological Review 59 (1): 8397.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sellars, Wilfrid. 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Steil, Benn, and Susan Woodward. 1999. “A European ‘New Deal’ for the Balkans.Foreign Affairs 78 (6): 95105.

  • Sunstein, Cass. 2009. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Tepe, Sultan. 2013. “The Perils of Polarization and Religious Parties: The Democratic Challenges of Political Fragmentation in Israel and Turkey.Democratization 20 (5): 831856.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vincent, Andrew. 2002. Nationalism and Particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wagner, Alex. 2016. “Trump, Sanders and the Coming Apocalypse.Atlantic, June 20. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/trump-and-sanders-and-the-apocalypse/486428/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warner, Benjamin, and Mitchell S. McKinney. 2013. “To Unite and Divide: The Polarizing Effect of Presidential Debates.” Communication Studies 64 (5): 508527.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weine, Stevan M. 1999. When History Is a Nightmare: Lives and Memories of Ethnic Cleansing in Bosnia-Herzegovina. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whitman, Richard J. 2013. “The Neo-Normative Turn in Theorizing the EU’s International Presence.Cooperation and Conflict 48 (2): 171193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wydra, Harald. 2015. Politics and the Sacred. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 24 24 7
Full Text Views 14 14 0
PDF Downloads 7 7 0