Theorizing about Democracy

in Democratic Theory
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Warwick m.j.saward@warwick.ac.uk
Restricted access

Abstract

How can we theorize about democracy? We can identify the major topics that form the focus of democratic theorists (and others traversing the field), such as democracy's meaning and value. This article focuses on the methodological lenses through which the topics have been and can be viewed. Different lenses bring into focus different phenomena, questions, and problems of democracy. It is argued that the lenses that bring conventional democratic theory approaches into view can provide an unnecessarily narrow and restrictive perspective. Donning different methodological lenses can introduce alternative perspectives, such as renewed attention to value pluralism and the “everyday.” The article sketches four “circles” that capture different potential types of and sources for theoretical work, some of them radically unconventional. It concludes by discussing the specific example of how methods and assumptions of design theory can prompt promising new approaches to theorizing about democracy.

Contributor Notes

Michael Saward is a professor of politics within the department of politics and international studies at the University of Warwick. E–mail: m.j.saward@warwick.ac.uk

Democratic Theory

An Interdisciplinary Journal

  • Borges, J. L. 2001. The Book of Sand and Shakespeare's Memory. London: Penguin.

  • Brown, T., with B. Katz. 2009. Change by Design. New York: Harper Business.

  • Bueger, C., and F. Gadinger. 2014. International Practice Theory: New Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Carens, J. H. 2004. “A Contextual Approach to Political Theory.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (2): 117132.

  • Cross, N. 2011. Design Thinking. London: Bloomsbury.

  • Fung, A. 2012. “Continuous Institutional Innovation and the Pragmatic Conception of Democracy.” Polity 44 (4): 609624.

  • Geertz, C. 2000. “The World in Pieces: Culture and Politics at the End of the Century.” In Available Light. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Hammond, M. 2018. “‘An Interesting Paper but Not Sufficiently Theoretical’: What Does Theorising in Social Research Look Like?Methodological Innovations 11 (2).

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hekman, S. 1997. “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited.” Signs 22 (2): 341365.

  • Held, D. 2006. Models of Democracy, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity.

  • Hendriks, F. 2010. Vital Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Huntington, S. P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Pres).

  • Le Guin, U. 2002. The Dispossessed. London: Gollancz.

  • List, C., and L. Valentini. 2016. “The Methodology of Political Theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, ed. H. Cappelen, T. Szabo Gendler, and J. Hawthorne. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 525-553.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Little, A. 2019. “The Politics of Makarrata: Understanding Indigenous-Settler Relations in Australia.” Political Theory. doi.org/10.1177/0090591719849023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lury, C., and N. Wakeford. 2012. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London and New York: Routledge.

  • MacPherson, C. B. 1977. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 2008. “Elaborating the ‘New Institutionalism.’” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, ed. S. A. Binder, R. A. W. Rhodes and B. A. Rockman. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 3-20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mattingley, C. 2019. “Defrosting Concepts, Destabilizing Doxa: Critical Phenomenology and the Perplexing Particular.” Anthropological Theory 19 (4): 415439. doi.org/10.1177/1463499619828568.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nicolini, D. 2009. “Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections.” Organisation Studies 30 (12): 13911418.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O'Neill, J. 2001. “Representing People, Representing Nature, Representing the World.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19 (4): 483500.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Purcell, E. A. Jr. 1973. The Crisis of Democratic Theory: Scientific Naturalism and the Problem of Value. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Puusemp, R. 1980. Beyond Art: Dissolution of Rosendale, NY (Highland Art Agents). Reprinted by Project Press, Grazer Kunstverein and Utah Museum of Contemporary Art, 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rollo, T. 2018. “Back to the Rough Ground: Textual, Oral and Enactive Meaning in Comparative Political Theory.” European Journal of Political Theory. doi.org/10.1177/1474885118795284.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saward, M. forthcoming 2020. Making Representations. London: Rowman and Littlefield/ECPR Press.

  • Schaffer, F. 1998. Democracy in Translation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Schmitter, P. 2011. “Diagnosing and Designing Democracy in Europe.” In The Future of Representative Democracy, ed. S. Alonso, J. Keane, and W. Merkel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 191-211.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tracy, K. 2010. Challenges of Ordinary Democracy: A Case Study in Deliberation and Dissent. University Park: Pennsylvania State Press.

  • Vezzoli, F. 2007. Democrazy. Milan: Electa.

  • Walzer, M. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Warren, M. E. 2017. “A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 111, 1.

  • Wolin, S. 1994. “Fugitive Democracy.” Constellations 1 (1): 1125.

  • Young, I.M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 239 153 19
Full Text Views 101 20 0
PDF Downloads 100 36 0