Democratic Theory When Democracy Is Fugitive
in Democratic TheorySearch for other papers by Ali Aslam in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David McIvor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joel Alden Schlosser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
All currencies in US Dollar
Abstract
Urgent alarms now warn of the erosion of democratic norms and the decline of democratic institutions. These antidemocratic trends have prompted some democratic theorists to reject the seeming inevitability of democratic forms of government and instead to consider democracy as a fugitive phenomenon. Fugitive democracy, as we argue below, is a theory composed of two parts. First, it includes a robust, normative ideal of democracy and, second, a clear-eyed vision of the historical defeats and generic difficulties attendant to that ideal. This article considers how democratic theorists might respond to the challenges posed by fugitive democracy and the implications of such an understanding for future research in democratic theory.
Contributor Notes
Joel Schlosser is an associate professor of political science at Bryn Mawr College. E-mail: jschlosser@brynmawr.edu
Ali Aslam is an assistant professor of politics at Mount Holyoke College. E-mail: aaslam@mtholyoke.edu
David McIvor is an associate professor of political science at Colorado State University. E-mail: David.McIvor@colostate.edu