Democratic Theory as Social Codification

in Democratic Theory
Author:
Christian Ewert University of Zurich christian.ewert@uzh.ch

Search for other papers by Christian Ewert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Marion Repetti University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland HES-SO marion.repetti@hevs.ch

Search for other papers by Marion Repetti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

What is democratic theory? In this article we treat it as a semiotic code – that is to say, a shared assumption – and argue that democratic theory enables people to think and talk about the idea(s) of democracy. Furthermore, the application of this specific code is highly political. For one, it is embedded in concrete contexts and discourses and used in arguments and narratives. In addition, the application of democratic theory has also substantial consequences on the lives of people. We illustrate this argument by reflecting briefly on Abraham Lincoln's “Gettysburg Address” and its recodification and consequences in different contexts.

Contributor Notes

Christian Ewert is a postdoctoral fellow and assistant to the chair of democracy and public governance at the University of Zurich. E-mail: Christian.Ewert@uzh.ch

Marion Repetti is professor at the School of Social Work, HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland. E-mail: marion.repetti@hevs.ch

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Democratic Theory

An Interdisciplinary Journal

  • Anderson, Carol. 2016. White Rage. London: Bloomsbury.

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 2012. Sur l'Etat [About the State]. Paris: Raisons d'Agir/Seuil.

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 2014. Langage et pouvoir symbolique [Language and Symbolic Power]. Paris: Seuil.

  • Collier, David, Fernando Daniel Hidalgo, and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu. 2006. “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications.Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (3): 211246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600923782

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eco, Umberto. 1976. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Eraly, Alain. 2011. “Quelle sémiotique pour quelle théorie sociale?Signata 2: 167194. https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.655.

  • Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.

  • Foster, Gaines M. 2018. “What's Not in a Name: The Naming of the American Civil War.Journal of the Civil War Era 8 (3): 416454. https://doi.org/10.1353/cwe.2018.0049

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, Sean. 2012. This Means That. That Means This. London: Laurence King Publishing.

  • Halliday, Michael. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.

  • Jakobson, Roman. 1990. On Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Krippendorff, Klaus. 2019. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Miller, David. 2009. “Democracy's Domain.Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (3): 201228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931. Collected Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Wade Baskin. New York: Philosophical Library.

  • Schneider, Anne Larason, and Helen Ingram. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

  • Schwarz, Barry. 2005. “The New Gettysburg Address: Fusing History and Memory.” Poetics 33: 6379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2005.01.003.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sørensen, Eva, and Jacob Torfing. 2005. “The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks.Scandinavian Political Studies 28 (3): 195218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00129.x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009. Philosophical Investigations, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1493 912 114
Full Text Views 48 7 1
PDF Downloads 70 6 0