Durkheim's Two Theories of Sacrifice

Ritual, Social Change and Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse

in Durkheimian Studies
Author:
Melissa Ptacek University of St Thomas, Fredericton meptacek@stu.ca

Search for other papers by Melissa Ptacek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The article begins by examining Durkheim's editorial role in the creation of Hubert and Mauss's essay on sacrifice, published in his new journal, the Année sociologique, in 1899. It then brings out how, in Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, Durkheim operated both with an ‘official’ and a more or less ‘hidden’ theory of sacrifice, the first based on the approach in Hubert and Mauss's essay, the second rooted in Durkheim's earlier views and critical editorial comments on Hubert and Mauss's ideas. In the process it brings out, through a detailed analysis of the work's chapters specifically on sacrifice but also on piacular rites, tensions, ambiguities and cross-purposes in the work as a whole. These especially turn round Durkheim's approach to violence and to the sacrificial offering or gift, and are also evident in his concern with different types of effervescence, the foundational and commemorative, as well as the ‘joyous’ and piacular. The article concludes by linking these tensions with issues at stake in Durkheim's interest in the French Revolution and account of the role of effervescence in moments of rupture and fundamental social change.

Contributor Notes

Melissa Ptacek received her doctorate from the University of California at Berkeley; she teaches at the University of St Thomas, Fredericton, Canada, and a current research project is on war and militarism. Email: meptacek@stu.ca

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Durkheimian Studies

Études Durkheimiennes

  • Ackerman, R. 1987. J. G. Frazer: His Life and Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Beidelman, T. O. 1974. W. Robertson Smith and the Sociological Study of Religion. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

  • Bellah, R. N. 1959. ‘Durkheim and History,’ American Sociological Review 24 (4): 447461.

  • Bert, J-F. 2012. Marcel Mauss, Henri Hubert et la sociologie des religions. Penser et écrire à deux. Paris: La Cause des Livres.

  • Durkheim, É. 1893a. De la Division du travail social (thesis). Paris: Alcan.

  • Durkheim, É. 1898a[ii]. ‘La Prohibition de l'inceste et ses origines’, L'Année sociologique 1: 170.

  • Durkheim, É. 1899a[i]. ‘Préface’, L'Année sociologique 2: ivi.

  • Durkheim, É. 1902a (i). ‘Sur le totémisme,’ L'Année sociologique 5: 82121.

  • Durkheim, É. 1907f. ‘La Religion: origines’, in É. Durkheim 1975, vol. 2: 65122.

  • Durkheim, É. 1912a. Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: le système totémique en Australie. Paris: Alcan.

  • Durkheim, É. 1975. Textes, 3 vols., V. Karady (ed.). Paris: Minuit.

  • Durkheim, É. 1987. ‘Lettres de Émile Durkheim à Henri Hubert’, P. Besnard (ed.), Revue française de sociologie 28 (3): 483534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durkheim, É. 1998. Lettres à Marcel Mauss. P. Besnard and M. Fournier (eds.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

  • Emirbayer, M. 1996. ‘Durkheim's Contribution to the Sociological Analysis of History,’ Sociological Forum 11 (2): 263284.

  • Fournier, M. [1994] 2006. Marcel Mauss: A Biography, tr. J. M. Todd. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

  • Fournier, M. [2007] 2012. Émile Durkheim: A Biography, tr. D. Macey. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Frazer, J. G. 1887. Totemism. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.

  • Frazer, J. G. 1890. The Golden Bough. London: Macmillan.

  • Frazer, J. G. 1900. The Golden Bough, 2nd edition. London: Macmillan.

  • Frazer, J. G. 1991. ‘Letter to Marcel Mauss, July 14, 1899’, Durkheim Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes 3 (1): 78.

  • Gane, M. 1992. The Radical Sociology of Durkheim and Mauss. London and New York: Routledge.

  • Giddens, A. 1972. ‘Introduction: Durkheim's writings in sociology and social philosophy’. In A. Giddens (ed.), Emile Durkheim: Selected Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Graham, E. T. 2007. ‘The danger of Durkheim: Ambiguity in the theory of social effervescence,’ Religion 37: 2638.

  • Heilbron, J. 2015. French Sociology. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

  • Hubert, H. and M. Mauss. 1899Essai sur la nature et la function de sacrifice’, L'Année sociologique 2: 29–138 (tr. H. Hubert and M. Mauss 1964).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hubert, H. and M. Mauss. 1964. Sacrifice: Its Nature and Function, tr. W. D. Halls, with foreword by E. E. Evans-Pritchard. London: Cohen and West.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hubert, H. and M. Mauss. 2012 ‘Correspondance Mauss-Hubert, 1898’, in J-F. Bert 2012: 91141.

  • Hunt, L. 1988. ‘The sacred and the French Revolution’. In J. C. Alexander (ed.), Durkheimian sociology: cultural studies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, R. A. 1981. ‘Robertson Smith, Durkheim, and Sacrifice: An Historical Context for The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life,’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 17 (2): 184205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, R. A. 2005. ‘Practices and presuppositions: some questions about Durkheim and Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse’. In J. C. Alexander and P. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mauss, M. 1998. ‘An Intellectual Self-portrait’, in W. James and N. J. Allen (eds.), Marcel Mauss: A Centenary Tribute, New York and Oxford, Berghahn Books, pp. 2942.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mellor, P. A. 1998. ‘Sacred Contagion and Social Vitality: Collective Effervescence in Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse,’ Durkheimian Studies/Études durkheimiennes 4: 87114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mukherjee, S. R. (ed.). 2010. Durkheim and Violence. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell and UNESCO.

  • Ozouf, M. 1976. La Fête révolutionnaire (1789–1799). Paris: Gallimard.

  • Pickering, W. S. F. 1984. Durkheim's Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Pearce, F. 1989. The Radical Durkheim. London: Unwin Hyman.

  • Ramp, W. 1998. ‘Effervescence, differentiation and representation in The Elementary Forms’. In N. J. Allen, W. S. F. Pickering and W. Watts Miller (eds.), On Durkheim's Elementary Forms of Religious Life. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richman, M. H. 2002. Sacred Revolutions: Durkheim and the Collège de Sociologie. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robertson Smith, W. [1889] 1894. Lectures on the Religion of the Semites, 2nd ed. London: A & C Black.

  • Rosa, F. 2003. L'Âge d'or du totémisme: histoire d'un débat anthropologique (1887–1929). Paris: CNRS Éditions.

  • Sembel, N. 2015. ‘Durkheim, Mauss et la dynamogénie: le lien Gley (1857–1930), Durkheimian Studies/Études durkheimiennes 21.

  • Spencer, B. and F. J. Gillen. 1899. The Native Tribes of Central Australia. London: Macmillan.

  • Spencer, B. and F. J. Gillen. 1904. The Northern Tribes of Central Australia. London: Macmillan.

  • Stedman Jones, S. 2001. Durkheim Reconsidered. Cambridge: Polity.

  • Strenski, I. 2002. Contesting Sacrifice: Religion, Nationalism, and Social Thought in France. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strenski, I. 2003. Theology and the First Theory of Sacrifice. Leiden: Brill,

  • Tiryakian, E. A. [1988] 2009From Durkheim to Managua: Revolutions as Religious Revivals’, in E. A. Tiryakian 2009: 189209.

  • Tiryakian, E. A. [1995] 2009. ‘Collective Effervescence, Social Change, and Charisma: Durkheim, Weber and 1989’, in E. A. Tiryakian 2009: 325338.

  • Tiryakian, E. A. [2007] 2009 ‘Emile Durkheim and Social Change’, in E. A. Tiryakian 2009: 6367.

  • Tiryakian, E. A. 2009. For Durkheim: Essays in Historical and Cultural Sociology. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.

  • Watts Miller, W. 2005. ‘Dynamogénique and Élémentaire’, Durkheimian Studies/Études durkheimiennes 11: 1832.

  • Watts Miller, W. 2012. A Durkheimian Quest: Solidarity and the Sacred. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 607 363 18
Full Text Views 150 5 2
PDF Downloads 323 7 3