From Neo-Kantianism to Durkheimian Sociology

Hermann Cohen and the Problem of Sacrifice

in Durkheimian Studies
Author:
Stephen Turner University of South Florida, USA turner@usf.edu

Search for other papers by Stephen Turner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The phenomenon of sacrifice was a major problem in nineteenth-century social thought about religion for a variety of reasons. These surfaced in a spectacular way in a German trial in which the most prominent Jewish philosopher of the century, the neo-Kantian Hermann Cohen, was asked to be an expert witness. The text he produced on the nature of Judaism was widely circulated and influential. It presents what can be taken as the neo-Kantian approach to understanding ritual. But it also reveals the ways in which neo-Kantianism avoided becoming relativistic social science. In this case, it came to the edge and stopped. Cohen's account is compared to the similar, but ‘empirical’, account of the same material in Marcel Mauss and Henri Hubert, which completed the transition.

Contributor Notes

Stephen Turner is a Distinguished University Professor at the Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida. He has written extensively about issues in social and political theory, especially related to Max Weber and his critics, about liberal democracy, about Émile Durkheim, about the history of sociology, and about cognitive science and tacit knowledge, complex organizations, experts, and the history and philosophy of quantification, international relations, and legal theory. E-mail: turner@usf.edu

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Durkheimian Studies

Études Durkheimiennes

  • Beiser, F. 2006. ‘Weimar Philosophy and the Fate of Neo-Kantianism’. In P. E. Gordon and J. P. McCormick (eds), Weimar Thought: A Contested Legacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 115132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohen, H. (1888). 1924. ‘Die Nachstenliebe im Talmud: Ein Gutachten, dem Königlichen Landgerichte zu Marburg erstattet’ [Charity in the Talmud: An expert opinion, the royal regional courts of Marburg reimbursed]. In B. Strauss (ed), Hermann Cohens Jüdische Schriften [Hermann Cohen's Jewish writings], Vol. 1. Berlin: Schwetschke, 145174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohen, H. (1919). 1972. Religion of Reason: Out of the Sources of Judaism. Trans. Simon Kaplan. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fouillée, A. 1893. La Psychologie des idées-forces [The psychology of key ideas]. Paris: Félix Akan.

  • Hollander, D. 2012. ‘Love-of-Neighbour and Ethics Out of Law in the Philosophy of Hermann Cohen’. In C. Wiese and M. Urban (eds), German-Jewish Thought between Religion and Politics: Festschrift in Honour of Paul Mendes-Flohr on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 83113.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howard, D. 1990. ‘Einstein and Duhem’. Synthese 83 (3): 363384. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20116794.

  • Hubert, H. and M. Mauss. (1899). 1964. Sacrifice: Its Nature and Functions. Trans. W. D. Halls. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Kepnes, S. 2012. ‘Hermann Cohen's Liturgical Reasoning’. In C. Wiese and M. Urban (eds), German-Jewish Thought between Religion and Politics: Festschrift in Honor of Paul Mendes-Flohr on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 115132.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klautke, E. 2013. The Mind of the Nation: Völkerpsychologie in Germany, 1851–1955. New York: Berghahn Books.

  • Morris, D. G. 2016. “Accommodating Nazi Tyranny? The Wrong Turn of the Social Democratic Legal Philosopher Gustav Radbruch after the War.” Law and History Review 34 (3): 649688. doi:10.1017/S0738248016000213.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olen, P. and S. Turner. 2015. ‘Durkheim, Sellars, and the Origins of Collective Intentionality’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (5): 954975. doi:10.1080/09608788.2015.1039483.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pareto, V. 1935. The Mind and Society. Ed. A. Livingston. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

  • Robertson Smith, W. (1889). 2002. Religion of the Semites. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

  • Simmel, G. (1890). 1902. Über Sociale Differenzierung: Sociologische und Psychologische Untersuchungen [On social differentiation: Sociological and psychological studies]. Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simmel, G. (1908). 1910. ‘How Is Society Possible?American Journal of Sociology 16 (3): 372391. doi: 10.1086/211904. First published as ‘Exkurs ulber das Problem: Wie ist Gesellschaft möglich?’ in Simmel, 1908. Soziologie. Leipzig: Duncan und Humblot, 27–45">10.1086/211904. First published as ‘Exkurs ulber das Problem: Wie ist Gesellschaft möglich?’ in Simmel, 1908. Soziologie. Leipzig: Duncan und Humblot, 27–45.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stammler, R. (1896). 1906. Wirtschaft und Recht nach der materialistischen der materialistischen Geschichtsauffassung. Eine sozialphilosophophische Untersuchung, 2nd edn [Economy and law according to the materialist conception of history]. Leipzig: Viet & Comp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stout, G. F. 1888. ‘The Herbartian Psychology (II)’. Mind 13 (52): 473498. doi:10.1093/mind/os-XIII.52.473.

  • Strenski, I. 2003. Theology and the First Theory of Sacrifice. Leiden: Brill.

  • Turner, S. 2017. ‘Durkheim as a Neo-Kantian Philosopher’. In W. Gephart and D. Wittes (eds), The Sacred and the Law: The Durkheimian Legacy. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 4969.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wedgewood, R. 2007. The Nature of Normativity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Winch, P. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2369 1327 34
Full Text Views 299 23 3
PDF Downloads 208 6 0