Spirit Possession among the Shakers of Pleasant Hill

A Link between Effervescence and Social Ideals

in Durkheimian Studies
Author:
Lisa C. Kistler Researcher, University of Kentucky, USA

Search for other papers by Lisa C. Kistler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7984-2328
Restricted access

Abstract

As a conceptual tool, effervescence offers a nuanced and complex explanation of forces for social change. Yet, it can be challenging to identify subject matter that spans the full implications of effervescence from embodied feeling to changes in social action over time. This study joins theories of effervescence with a unique set of primary historical records from a nineteenth-century religious utopian community in the United States to investigate whether effervescence might have a role in the creation, maintenance or decay of social ideals. As an explanation for social action, findings suggest that effervescence points to a link between embodied feeling, social ideals and institutional control – aspects of effervescence that offer avenues for future theoretical and empirical research.

Contributor Notes

Lisa Kistler is a PhD candidate in Sociology at the University of Kentucky. She holds a Master of Science in Environment and Development from the University of Edinburgh and a Bachelor of Arts in Geography from Middlebury College. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7984-2328

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Durkheimian Studies

Études Durkheimiennes

  • Barnwell, A. 2018. ‘Durkheim as Affect Theorist’. Journal of Classical Sociology 18 (1): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795x17702917.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brewer, P. J. 1992. ‘“Tho’ of the Weaker Sex”: A Reassessment of Gender Equality among the Shakers’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 17 (3): 609–635. https://doi.org/10.1086/494751.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Campbell, D. 1978. ‘Women's Life in Utopia: The Shaker Experiment in Sexual Equality Reappraised – 1810 to 1860’. New England Quarterly 51 (1): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/364589.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clark, T. D. and F. G. Ham. (1968) 2014. Pleasant Hill and Its Shakers. Pleasant Hill, KY: Pleasant Hill Press.

  • Collins, R. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Coşgel, M. M. 2000. ‘The Family in Utopia: Celibacy, Communal Child Rearing, and Continuity in a Religious Commune’. Journal of Family History 25 (4): 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/036319900002500403.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crosthwaite, J. F. 1989. ‘“A White a Seamless Robe”: Celibacy and Equality in Shaker Art and Theology’. Colby Quarterly 25 (3): 188198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durkheim, É. (1895) 2013. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. Trans. W. D. Halls. New York: Free Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durkheim, É. (1906) 1953. ‘The Determination of Moral Facts.’ In Sociology and Philosophy. Trans. D. F. Pocock. London: Cohen & West, 3562.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durkheim, É. (1912). 2001. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans. C. Cosman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Durkheim, É. (1914) 2005. ‘The Dualism of Human Nature and Its Social Conditions’. Trans. I. Eulriet and W. W. Miller. Durkheimian Studies 11: 35–45. https://doi.org/10.3167/175223005783472211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emirbayer, M. 1996. ‘Useful Durkheim.’ Sociological Theory 14 (2): 109–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/201902.

  • Fish, J. S. 2013. ‘Homo Duplex Revisited: A Defence of Émile Durkheim's Theory of the Moral Self’. Journal of Classical Sociology 13 (3): 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795x13480440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Foster, L. 1984. Religion and Sexuality: The Shakers, the Mormons, and the Oneida Community. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

  • Garrett, C. 1987. Spirit Possession and Popular Religion: From the Camisards to the Shakers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HHS (Harrodsburg Historical Society), Shaker, Pleasant Hill, Kentucky, Reel I. 1845–1894. Vol. 3. ‘Church record, Book A’. ‘Church Record, Book B’. ‘Church Record, Book C’.

  • HHS (Harrodsburg Historical Society), Shaker, Pleasant Hill, Kentucky, Reel II. 1843–1846. Vol. 10. ‘Pleasant Hill Spiritual Journal’.

  • Kanter, R. M. 1972. Commitment and Community. Communes and Utopias in Sociological Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matarese, S. M. and P. G. Salmon. 2007. ‘Utopia and Its Discontents: A Brother's Secrets’. Midwest Quarterly 48 (3): 417433.

  • McGuire, M. B. (2016). ‘Individual Sensory Experiences, Socialized Senses, and Everyday Lived Religion in Practice’. Social Compass 63 (2): 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768616628789.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McLendon, A. E. 2013. ‘“Leap and Shout, Ye Living Building!”: Ritual Performance and Architectural Collaboration in Early Shaker Meetinghouses’. Buildings & Landscapes: Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum 20 (2): 48–76. https://doi.org/10.5749/buildland.20.2.0048.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pfaff, S. and Yang, G. 2001. ‘Double-edged Rituals and the Symbolic Resources of Collective Action: Political Commemorations and the Mobilization of Protest in 1989’. Theory and Society 30 (4): 539–589. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011817231681

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ptacek, M. 2015. ‘Durkheim's Two Theories of Sacrifice: Ritual, Social Change and “Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse”’. Durkheimian Studies 21: 75–95. https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2015.210104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rawls, A. W. 2004. Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim's The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rhorer, M. A. 1996. ‘The Rise and Fall of Mother's Southwestern Branch: A Socio-demographic Study of the Shaker Community at Pleasant Hill, Kentucky 1805–1920’. MA thesis, University of Kentucky.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schüttpelz, E. and M. Zillinger. 2017. ‘The Bodily Efficacy of the Categories’. Durkheimian Studies 23: 106–127. https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2017.230107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seeman, E. R. 2015. ‘Native Spirits, Shaker Visions: Speaking with the Dead in the Early Republic’. Journal of the Early Republic 35 (3): 347373.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shilling, C. and P. A. Mellor. 1998. ‘Durkheim, Morality and Modernity: Collective Effervescence, Homo Duplex and the Sources of Moral Action’. British Journal of Sociology 49 (2): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/591309.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shilling, C. and P. A. Mellor. 2011. ‘Retheorising Emile Durkheim on Society and Religion: Embodiment, Intoxication and Collective Life’. Sociological Review 59 (1): 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2010.01990.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simi, P., K. Blee, M. DeMichele and S. Windisch. 2017. ‘Addicted to Hate: Identity Residual among Former White Supremacists’. American Sociological Review 82 (6): 1167–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417728719.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stein, S. J. 1992. The Shaker Experience in America. A History of the United Society of Believers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Terry, G. and N. Hayfield. 2021. Essentials of Thematic Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Thurman, S. 1998. ‘Shaker Women and Sexual Power: Heresy and Orthodoxy in the Shaker Village of Harvard, Massachusetts’. Journal of Women's History 10 (1): 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2010.0563.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wacquant, L. 2000. ‘Durkheim and Bourdieu: The Common Plinth and Its Cracks’. Sociological Review 49 (S1): 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2001.tb03536.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van de Walle, G. 2008. ‘Durkheim and Socialization’. Durkheimian Studies 14: 35–58. https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2008.140105.

  • Weiss, R. 2012. ‘From Ideas to Ideals: Effervescence as the Key to Understanding Morality’. Durkheimian Studies 18: 81–97. https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2012.180106.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wenger, T. J. 2002. ‘Female Christ and Feminist Foremother: The Many Lives of Ann Lee’. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 18 (2): 532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Winiarski, D. L. 2019. ‘Seized by the Jerks: Shakers, Spirit Possession, and the Great Revival’. William and Mary Quarterly 76 (1): 111–150. https://doi.org/10.5309/willmaryquar.76.1.0111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WRHS (Western Reserve Historical Society), Shaker Communities, Shaker Manuscripts, Series VI B 53 159. 1841. Vol. 49. ‘Declarations or Testimonies of Inspired Instruments at Pleasant Hill, Ky’.

  • WRHS (Western Reserve Historical Society), Shaker Communities, Shaker Manuscripts, Series V III A 67 201. 1843–1845. Vol. 49. ‘A night Vision by Sarah Pool, Pleasant Hill April 17th, 1843’. ‘A Brief account of the proceedings of the day and the meeting of the Society at Pleasant Hill, Ky December 25th, 1845’.

  • WRHS (Western Reserve Historical Society), Shaker Communities, Shaker Manuscripts, Series VIII B 81 247. 1838–1843. Vols. 211–213. ‘A Record of Visions, Messages and Communications Given by Divine Inspiration in the Society at Pleasant Hill, Ky’. ‘A Family Record of Messages and Communications Given by Divine Inspiration. First Order of the Church at Pleasant Hill Ky’. 2 vols.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 733 733 29
Full Text Views 180 180 29
PDF Downloads 34 34 0