Purchase this article
USD $30.00
Author:
Danielle DiNovelli-Lang
Danielle DiNovelli-Lang
Carleton University Danielle.DiNovelli@carleton.ca
Search for other papers by Danielle DiNovelli-Lang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Danielle DiNovelli-Lang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
USD $0.01
All currencies in US Dollar
The vectors by which the question of the animal has confronted the discipline of anthropology are both diverse—from paleoarchaeological fascination with the transition from ape to man to sociocultural accounts of human-animal conflict—and fraught insofar as they tend to loop back into one another. For instance, while posthumanism is intellectually novel, to take its line of critique seriously is to recognize that the science of man has depended on the philosophical animal from the start. A still tighter loop could be drawn around Lévi-Strauss's foundational interest in animal symbolism and the Amazonian ontologies undergirding Latour's amodern philosophy. Three related interdependencies pull hard on these loops: 1) philosophy and anthropology; 2) the human and the animal; 3) modernity and indigeneity. This last interdependency is notably undertheorized in the present efflorescence of human-animal scholarship. This article attends to some of the consequences of modernity/indigeneity's clandestine operations in the literature.