The Social Life of Blame in the Anthropocene

in Environment and Society
Author:
Peter Rudiak-Gould University of Toronto peterrg@gmail.com

Search for other papers by Peter Rudiak-Gould in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The Anthropocene can be understood as a crisis of blame: it is not only a geological era but also a political zeitgeist in which the marks of human agency and culpability can be perceived nearly everywhere. Treating global climate change as a metonym for this predicament, I show how life in the Anthropocene reconfigures blame in four ways: it invites ubiquitous blame, ubiquitous blamelessness, selective blame, and partial blame. I review case studies from around the world, investigating which climate change blame narratives actors select, why, and with what consequences. Climate change blame can lead to scapegoating and buck-passing but also to their opposites. Given that the same ethical stance may lead to radically different consequences in different situations, the nobleness or ignobleness of an Anthropocene blame narrative is not a property of the narrative itself, but of the way in which actors deploy it in particular times and places.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Environment and Society

Advances in Research

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1178 493 23
Full Text Views 66 18 0
PDF Downloads 81 16 0