Triangulation as a Problem in the Plays and Sonnets

in European Judaism
Richard H. Weisberg Yeshiva University

Search for other papers by Richard H. Weisberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
Restricted access


As to the risks of what I call the ‘triangulation’ of both public power and private emotion, I extend my earlier treatment of ‘mediation’ in The Merchant of Venice to Measure for Measure, King Lear, Hamlet, and The Tempest, linking to them Shakespeare’s Sonnet 134. For Shakespeare, whether poet or playwright, a private triangulation of direct romantic obligation is as nettlesome as the public official’s similar behaviour – as when the Duke ‘outsources’ Viennese power to Angelo – and the results are quite as disastrous. The complex and highly legalistic sonnet concerns the triangulation of passion from the speaker to a friend. The beloved winds up ensnaring both through ‘the statute of [her] beauty’. The word ‘surety’ – used centrally in the poem and twice in Merchant – pinpoints, through the delegation to a third party of obligations otherwise charged directly to two committed parties, the underlying Shakespearean problematic

Contributor Notes

Richard H. Weisberg, Floersheimer Professor of Constitutional Law, Yeshiva University, foreshadows these themes in Poethics: and Other Strategies of Law and Literature (1992).

  • Collapse
  • Expand

European Judaism

A Journal for the New Europe


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 884 132 15
Full Text Views 27 2 0
PDF Downloads 37 1 0