Assumptions matter

Reflections on the Kanbur typology

in Focaal
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Toronto
Restricted access

In contradistinction to Ravi Kanbur's (2003) summarization of a recent conference on qualitative and quantitative poverty analysis in which he proposed a typology of differences between 'qual and quant' approaches, I argue that key elements in this typology are derivative of more basic distinctions in the philosophy of social science between three research programs: empiricism/positivism, hermeneutics, and critical theory/critical hermeneutics. The point is not simply of academic interest but has practical implications for aspects of poverty analysis, including numeric transformation of data, assessment of the validity of empirical findings, and inferring policy implications from research results.


Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 18 17 3
Full Text Views 3 1 1
PDF Downloads 3 0 0