Based on ethnographic research in South China’s megacity Guangzhou,
this article examines the gaps and contradictions in the central and local Chinese
states’ efforts to regulate migrant traders from Africa. I identify economic interests,
everyday racism, and ideological concerns as three major factors in shaping
the nonrecording tactics of the Chinese states. The article argues that nonrecording
is a practical tactic pursued by both the central and local states in order to balance
multiple and conflicting interests at the regional, national, and international
scales. Due to tensions between different levels of state authorities, China’s policies
toward migrants from Africa are marked by sporadic shifts between recording,
nonrecording, and derecording, which contribute to the illegibility of issues of immigration
in state bureaucracy.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.