Israeli High Court Rulings on the Security Wall

in Israel Studies Review
Author: Udi Sommer 1
View More View Less
  • 1 Columbia University udi.sommer@gmail.com
Restricted access

abstract

With the ever-growing significance of international law both domestically and internationally, courts mediate much of the give and take between the international system and the national political arenas, thus acting in settings where global and local are mixed. Such a pivotal position, I argue, lends courts the ability to maximize a twofold utility, which is inextricably linked. First, on the international level, judicial institutions play an increasingly important role and form what is essentially a transnational epistemic community. Second, on the domestic level, courts capitalize on this pivotal position to become increasingly central in the decision-making process, forming alliances with other domestic players and thereby securing the implementation of judicial rulings. A case study of decisions of the Israeli Supreme Court concerning the security fence Israel built around the Occupied Territories is offered as an empirical test for the Court-Pivot Dual Utility Model that I present in this article.

Contributor Notes

udi sommer teaches in the Department of Political Science at Columbia University as an Israel Institute Visiting Professor and at Tel Aviv University as a tenured Senior Faculty Member in Political Science. His most recent book is Legal Path Dependence and the Long Arm of the Religious State (2016), and his work has appeared in publications such as Regulation & Governance, Comparative Political Studies, the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, and the Law & Society Review, among others.

  • Adler, Emanuel, and Peter M. Haas. 1992. “Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program.” International Organization 46 (1): 367390.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011. “International Practices.” International Theory 3 (1): 136.

  • Barzilai, Gad. 1996. Wars, Internal Conflicts, and Political Order: A Jewish Democracy in the Middle East. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barzilai, Gad. 2003. “National Security in Courts and Law: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis.” Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, 2731 August.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bennett, Andrew, and Colin Elman. 2007. “Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (2): 170195.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benvenisti, Eyal. 2008. “The Conception of International Law as a Legal System.” German Yearbook of International Law 50: 393405.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Canivet, Guy. 2010. “Trans-Judicial Dialogue in a Global World.” In Highest Courts and Globalisation, ed. Sam Muller and Sidney Richards, 2140. The Hague: Hague Academic Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cole, Wade M. 2005. “Sovereignty Relinquished? Explaining Commitment to the International Human Rights Covenants, 1966–1999.” American Sociological Review 70: 472495.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cross, Mai’a K. D. 2012. “Rethinking Epistemic Communities Twenty Years Later.” Review of International Studies 39 (1): 137160.

  • Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (2): 279295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dezalay, Yves, and Bryant G. Garth. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dotan, Yoav. 1998. “Judicial Review and Political Accountability: The Case of the High Court of Justice in Israel.” Israel Law Review 32 (3): 448475.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

  • Falke, Simon. 2012. “Peace on the Fence? Israel’s Security Culture and the Separation Fence to the West Bank.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 27 (2): 229237.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gelter, Martin, and Mathias Seims. 2012. “Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations between Ten of Europe’s Highest Courts.” Utrecht Law Review 8 (2): 8899.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gerring, John. 2004. “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For?American Political Science Review 98 (2): 341354.

  • Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Vanessa A. Baird. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92 (2): 343358.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hofnung, Menachem. 1996. Democracy, Law, and National Security in Israel. Alder-shot: Dartmouth Publishing.

  • Hofnung, Menachem, and Keren Weinshall-Margel. 2011. “Judicial Rejection as Substantial Relief: The Israeli Supreme Court and the ‘War on Terror.’” In Courts and Terrorism: Nine Nations Balance Rights and Security, ed. Mary L. Vol cansek and John F. Stack Jr., 150168. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ICJ (International Court of Justice). 2004. Legal Consequences of the Construction of the Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. General List No. 131, 9 July. http://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnstone, Ian. 2003. “Security Council Deliberations: The Power of the Better Argument.” European Journal of International Law 14: 437480.

  • Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1999. “Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics.” International Social Science Journal 51 (159): 89101.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lazega, Emmanuel. 2012. “Mapping Judicial Dialogue across National Borders: An Exploratory Network Study of Learning from Lobbying among European Intellectual Property Judges.” Utrecht Law Review 8 (2): 115128.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mak, Elaine. 2012. “Reference to Foreign Law in the Supreme Courts of Britain and the Netherlands: Explaining the Development of Judicial Practices.” Utrecht Law Review 8 (2): 2034.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meydani, Assaf. 2014. The Anatomy of Human Rights in Israel: Constitutional Rhetoric and State Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Posner, Eric A., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2006. “The Law of Other States.” Stanford Law Review 59: 131180.

  • Posner, Richard A. 2008. “Judicial Cosmopolitanism.” In How Judges Think, 347368 Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42: 427460.

  • Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1993. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Scalia, Antonin. 2004. “Keynote Address: Foreign Legal Authority in the Federal Courts.” Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 98: 305310.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1996. “The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 9711003.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shamir, Ronen. 1990. “‘Landmark Cases’ and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel’s High Court of Justice.” Law and Society Review 24 (3): 781806.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shamir, Ronen. 2000. The Colonies of Law: Colonialism, Zionism and Law in Early Mandate Palestine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2003. “A Global Community of Courts.” Harvard International Law Journal 44 (1): 191219.

  • Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Sommer, Udi. 2009. “Crusades against Corruption and Institutionally Induced Strategies in the Israeli Supreme Court.” Israel Affairs 15 (3): 279295.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sommer, Udi. 2010. “A Strategic Court and National Security: Comparative Lessons from the Israeli Case.” Israel Studies Forum 25 (2): 5480.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sommer, Udi, and Olga Frishman. 2016. “Translating Justice: The International Organization of Constitutional Courts.” Law & Policy 38 (2): 124142.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tate, C. Neal, and Torbjörn Vallinder, eds. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.

  • UN (United Nations). 1979. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977. Vol. No. 1125, I-17512. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/trtdocs/en/icrc-p1/trt_icrc_p1.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 27 27 7
Full Text Views 3 3 0
PDF Downloads 2 2 0