The Democratic Backsliding Debate and the Controversy over Regime Classification in Israel
in Israel Studies ReviewSearch for other papers by Gal Ariely in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
All currencies in US Dollar
Abstract
Using the 2023 controversy over Israel's judicial overhaul as a case, this article analyzes the broader, decades-long debate about the nature of the Israeli regime. It demonstrates how conflicting assumptions about democracy and the Israeli regime underpin different interpretations of the proposed judicial overhaul. The 2023 debate contraposed majoritarian and liberal orientations, echoing previous understandings of Israel as either a liberal democracy or a diminished type of democracy like ethnic democracy. Despite their differences, both positions in this debate regard Israel as a democracy equivalent to other liberal democracies in the West and neglect the question of the regime's borders and its implication for the regime's classification.
Contributor Notes
GAL ARIELY is an associate professor at the Department of Politics & Government, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. His research interest is democracy and national identity by employing cross-national analysis and experimental survey research. Gal has authored or co-authored several articles that were published in Political Studies, Nations and Nationalism, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Ethnic and Racial Studies as well as other journals. E-mail: galariel@bgu.ac.il