Search for other papers by Tom Lourie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
All currencies in US Dollar
Abstract
The limited literature on populism in Israel allows for an examination of the conceptual debate on populism's practical implications. By employing a contemporary conceptualization of populism to the case of Israel, this article examines the conventional wisdom classifying Menachem Begin and Benjamin Netanyahu as populists. The article utilizes a multimethod analysis combining content analysis and comparative case studies, analyzing the rhetoric and policymaking of both leaders. The content analysis reveals that Begin exhibited a relatively low degree of populism, a characteristic similarly observed in the early years of Netanyahu's leadership. However, a comprehensive evaluation of their policies and legislative actions highlights a significant divergence. Begin consistently adhered to liberal democratic principles, while Netanyahu's illiberal tendencies were evident from his first term in office. The findings further indicate that Netanyahu's populism progressively intensified throughout his tenure, particularly gaining momentum after 2015.
Contributor Notes
TOM LOURIE is a PhD candidate in Political Science at the University of California, Irvine. His dissertation focuses on populism and its effects on Israeli democracy. His recent publication: “The Decision Calculus of Donald Trump.” In How Do Leaders Make Decisions? Evidence from the East and West, Part A, ed. Dimitry Adamsky and Alex Mintz, 13–33. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. Email: tlourie@uci.edu