Contradictory Discourses of Protection and Control in Transnational Asylum Law

in Journal of Legal Anthropology

For immigration authorities, the goal of asylum hearings is to differentiate between economic migrants and legitimate political asylum seekers. However, in the stories asylum seekers tell, these categories often blur. Nevertheless, the asylum process uses this differentiation to conceal inequities in the system, and to justify denials. This article examines political asylum as a transnational and culturally local process and argues that contradictions between protection and control underlie some of the seemingly absurd denials of asylum applications.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.