Purchase this article
USD $22.00
Author:
Don Gardner
Don Gardner
Australian National University donald.gardner@alumni.anu.edu
Search for other papers by Don Gardner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Don Gardner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
USD $0.01
All currencies in US Dollar
This comment focuses less on the three hopes expressed in Nigel Rapport's title than on the conception of individuality and its relation to the aspirations of the social sciences that underpins his case for cosmopolitan politesse. First, I want to say that Nigel Rapport's industry is astonishing. He reads widely, across many genres, and has written a great deal aimed at persuading us of two things: that the social sciences suffer from fundamental shortcomings, and that they are implicated, if not complicit, in communitarianism and other worrying tendencies of our age. Possibly social anthropology's most ardent, resilient and ‘poetic’ reformer, he offers us here a digest of one of his many publications concerned with establishing the central importance to anthropology – and to the possibility of a decent world – of what his friend, Michael Jackson, calls ‘the human microsphere’. Because of Rapport's many different journeys through this microsphere, it is not possible here to cover more than a little of the terrain.1
Contributor Notes
Don Gardner (donald.gardner@alumni.anu.edu.au) began ethnographic fieldwork among Mian-speakers of the Telefomin region of Papua New Guinea in 1975. He has worked on a range of topics, from kinship and ritual to demography and malariometry. His theoretical interests focus on the anthropology of religion and social theory, especially the intentionality of social action and its relation to the explanation of human social life and its trajectories. Now retired, he worked for thirty years at the Australian National University, but he has also held positions at universities in Sydney, Heidelberg and, more recently, the University of Lucerne.