Why did London place his life and those of his crew at risk of imminent death when he voyaged to the Solomon Islands in 1908, a region he believed to be filled with cannibals and headhunters? Based on archival sources, the books London had read to prepare himself for the voyage, and recent ethno-history of the region, this article argues that London’s voyage did not occasion a more enlightened view of race, as some recent scholars have argued; indeed, his months in the Solomon Islands confirmed the racialist cast of his thinking. London undertook his journey into a region he perceived as dangerous as part of a sense of adventure that depended on demonstrating courage and manliness, and in the process he acted as a metaphoric headhunter himself.
Keith Newlin is Professor of English at University of North Carolina Wilmington, where he teaches courses in American literary realism and naturalism, modernism, and drama. The editor of Studies in American Naturalism, he is the author of Hamlin Garland, A Life (2008) and editor of The Oxford Handbook of American Literary Naturalism (2011), among other books. In addition to teaching as a Fulbright Senior Scholar in Germany, he has lectured widely in China on such topics as Jack London, Hamlin Garland, realism and naturalism, and literary authorship, as well as in Wales and South Korea. E-mail: email@example.com
O’Brien, Aoife. 2017. “Crime and Retribution in the Western Solomon Islands: Punitive Raids, Material Culture, and the Arthur Mahaffy Collection, 1898–1904.” Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History18 (1): n.p. Project MUSE,http://doi:10.1353/cch.2017.0000.
O’Brien, Aoife. 2017. “Crime and Retribution in the Western Solomon Islands: Punitive Raids, Material Culture, and the Arthur Mahaffy Collection, 1898–1904.” Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History 18 (1): n.p. Project MUSE, http://doi:10.1353/cch.2017.0000.)| false