Universities run for, by, and with the faculty, students and staff: Alternatives to the neoliberal destruction of higher education

in Learning and Teaching
Author:
Susan Wright Aarhus University suwr@dpu.dk

Search for other papers by Susan Wright in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Davydd J. Greenwood Cornell University djg6@cornell.edu

Search for other papers by Davydd J. Greenwood in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

After analysing the organisational pathologies and societal ills created by the neoliberalisation of universities, the article engages in an organisational critique of the pseudo-business model currently in use. It poses as a solution the re-creation of universities as trusts, with a model of beneficiary ownership, a matrix form of organisation and renewed relations with society. For inspiration it looks to beneficiary-run organisations on the model of the John Lewis Partnership or the Mondragón University. The article explains why such beneficial matrix organisations are superior to current universities and how they offer an opportunity to recreate universities for the public good.

Contributor Notes

Susan Wright is Professor of Educational Anthropology at the Danish School of Education, Aarhus University, Denmark. She has coordinated two EU-funded projects (URGE and UNIKE) exploring the reform of universities in the global knowledge economies of Europe and the Asia Pacific. One of these, URGE, resulted in Death of the Public University? (co-edited with Cris Shore) to be published by Berghahn in 2017. E-mail: suwr@dpu.dk

Davydd J. Greenwood is the Goldwin Smith Professor of Anthropology Emeritus, Cornell University, U.S.A. He has extensive experience of using action research to create participatory transformations of communities and organisations. He coordinates the ‘Improving Universities’ network of thirty-seven experts worldwide that arose from the final conference of the UNIKE project and is committed to developing universities based on cooperative principles, beneficiary ownership and participatory management. E-mail: djg6@cornell.edu

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Learning and Teaching

The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences

  • Behn, R. (2001) Rethinking Democratic Accountability, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

  • Biesta, G., Kwiek, M., Lock, G., Martins, H., Masschelein, J., Papatsiba, V., Simons, M. and Zgaga, P. (2009) ‘What is the public role of the university? A proposal for a public research agenda’, European Education Research Journal 8, no. 2: 249254.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boden, R., Ciancanelli, P. and Wright, S. (2012) ‘Trust universities? Governance for post-capitalist futures’, Journal of Co-operative Studies 45, no. 2: 1624.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, P., Lauder, H. and Ashton, D. (2011) The Global Auction: The Broken Promises of Education, Jobs, and Incomes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Council of Europe (2006) Recommendation 1762: Academic Freedom and University Autonomy, http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17469&lang=en (accessed 15 March 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eijnatten, F.M. van (1993) The Paradigm that Changed the Workplace, Assen: VanGorcum.

  • Eversheds (2009) Developing Future University Structures: New Funding and Legal Models, London: Universities UK.

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenwood, D. and Levin, M. (2007) Introduction to Action Research, 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Grove, J. (2016) ‘Times Higher Education pay survey 2016’, Times Higher Education, 19 May: 3447, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/times-higher-education-pay-survey-2016 (accessed 20 December 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansen, B.G. (2017) ‘Science/industry collaboration: bugs, project barons and managing symbiosis’, in C. Shore and S. Wright (eds) (2017) Death of the Public University? Oxford: Berghahn (forthcoming).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • High Pay Commission (2010) ‘Cheques with balances: why tackling high pay is in the national interest. Final report of the High Pay Commission’, London: High Pay Centre, http://highpaycentre.org/files/Cheques_with_Balances.pdf (accessed 16 January 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holtskog, H. (2014) ‘How industry makes knowledge: facilitative management’, (PhD diss., Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jemielniak, D. (2014) Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Klein, N. (2008) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, Toronto: Random House of Canada.

  • Klev, R. and Levin, M. (2012) Participative Transformation: Learning and Development in Practising Change, London: Gower.

  • Levin, M. and Greenwood, D. (2016) Creating a New Public University and Reviving Democracy: Action Research in Higher Education. New York: Berghahn.

  • Machado, A. [1912] (1979) ‘Proverbios y cantares XXIX’ [Proverbs and Songs 29], Campos de Castilla in B.J. Craige (trans.) Selected Poems of Antonio Machado, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Antonio_Machado (accessed 19 December 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maranta, A., Guggenheim, M., Gisler, P. and Pohl, C. (2003) ‘The reality of experts and the Imagined Lay Person’, Acta Sociologica 46: 150165.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • May, W.F. (2000) The Physician’s Covenant: Images of the Healer in Medical Ethics, 2nd ed., Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGettigan, A. (2013) The Great University Gamble: Money, Markets, and the Future of Higher Education, London: Pluto Press.

  • McMahon, W. (2009) Higher Learning, Greater Good: The Private and Social Benefits of Higher Education, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newfield, C. (2008) Unmaking the Public University. The Forty-year Assault on the Middle Class, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newfield, C. (2016) The Great Mistake: How We Wrecked Public Universities and How We Can Fix Them, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Oxford: Polity.

  • Pemberton, B. (2014) ‘Critical times: governance in the UK nuclear industry’, (Unpublished PhD thesis, Roehampton University London) http://roehampton.openrepository.com/roehampton/handle/10142/332002 (accessed 18 December 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Posecznick, A. and Shumar, W. (eds) (2014) Collusion, Complicity and Resistance: Theorising Academics, the University and the Neoliberal Marketplace, special issue of Learning and Teaching: International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences (LATISS) 7, no. 1: 1104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Readings, B. (1996) The University in Ruins, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Rectors of European Universities (1988) Magna Charta Universitatum, http://www.magna-charta.org/resources/files/the-magna-charta/english (accessed 19 March 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Salmi, J. (2009) The Challenge of Establishing World-class Universities, Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Shore, C. (2007) ‘After neoliberalism? The reform of New Zealand’s university system’, Working Papers on University Reform no. 6. at http://edu.au.dk/fileadmin/www.dpu.dk/forskning/forskningsprogrammer/epoke/workingpapers/om-dpu_institutter_institut-for-paedagogik_20100127132545_wp-6-ny.pdf (accessed 19 March 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shumar, W. (1997) College for Sale: A Critique of the Commodification of Higher Education, London: Falmer Press.

  • Silvy, T. (2016) ‘Years in the making, signature building launched at University of Northern Colorado groundbreaking’, The Tribune, 22 October, http://www.greeleytribune.com/news/local/years-in-the-making-signature-building-launched-at-university-of-northern-colorado-groundbreaking/ (accessed 15 March 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simons, M. and Masschelein, J. (2009) ‘The public and its university: beyond learning for civic employability?European Education Research Journal 8, no. 2: 204217.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, L. (2001) ‘The academic values’, in C. Bach-Nielsen (ed.) Dannelse, Uddannelse, Universiteter, Århus: Århus University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strathern, M. (2003) ‘Re-describing society’, Minerva 41: 263276.

  • Strathern, M. (2005) ‘Universities – and society!Anthropology in Action 12, no. 1: 1119.

  • Thomas, L. (ed.) 2001 Widening Participation in Post-compulsory Education, London: Continuum.

  • Washburn, J. (2005) University, Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education, New York: Basic Books.

  • Wright, S. (2008) ‘Governance as a regime of discipline’, in N. Dyck (ed.) Exploring Regimes of Discipline: The Dynamics of Restraint, Oxford: Berghahn, EASA Series, 7598.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wright, S. (2014) ‘“Humboldt” Humbug! Contemporary mobilizations of “Humboldt” as a discourse to support the corporatization and marketization of universities and to disparage alternatives’, in T. Karlsohn, P. Josephson and J. Ostling (eds) The Humboldtian Tradition – Origins and Legacies, Leiden: Brill, 143163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wright, S. (2015) ‘Anthropology and the “imaginators” of future European universities’, Focaal 71: 617.

  • Wright, S. (2016) ‘The imaginators of English university reform’, in S. Slaughter and B.J. Taylor (eds) Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce Development: Competitive Advantage in Europe, the US, and Canada, Dordrecht: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wright, S., Greenwood, D. and Boden, R. (2011) ‘Report on a field visit to Mondragón University: a cooperative experience/experiment’, Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences (LATISS) 4, no. 3: 3856.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wright, S. and Ørberg, J.W. (2015) ‘Autonomy and control: Danish university reform in the context of modern governance’, in S.B. Hyatt, B. Shear and S. Wright (eds) Learning under Neoliberalism: Ethnographies of Governance in Higher Education, Oxford: Berghahn, 178200.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ørberg, J.W. (2007) ‘Who speaks for the university? Legislative frameworks for Danish university leadership 1970–2003’, Working Papers on University Reform no. 5. Copenhagen: Danish School of Education, http://edu.au.dk/fileadmin/www.dpu.dk/forskning/forskningsprogrammer/epoke/workingpapers/om-dpu_institutter_paedagogisk-antropologi_new-managementx2c-new-identities_working-papers_20070611113532_working-paper-5--who-speaks-for-the-university2.pdf (accessed 19 March 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3399 1828 498
Full Text Views 59 9 2
PDF Downloads 50 11 1