Neoliberal individualism in Dutch universities: Teaching and learning anthropology in an insecure environment

in Learning and Teaching
Author:
Ellen Bal
Search for other papers by Ellen Bal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Erella Grassiani
Search for other papers by Erella Grassiani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Kate Kirk
Search for other papers by Kate Kirk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

This article is based on our own experiences and that of several of our colleagues teaching social and cultural anthropology in different Dutch institutions for higher learning. We focus in particular on teaching and learning in two small liberal arts and science (LAS) colleges, where anthropology makes up part of the social science curriculum and/or is part of the core curriculum. The data collected from our own critical reflections developed during informal discussion and from formal interviews with colleagues, together with literature on recent changes in academia, leads us to argue that neoliberal individualism, shaped by management tactics that constantly measure individual performance and output, is making academia an increasingly insecure place in which to work and study. The consequences of this insecurity include increasing mental health problems among both students and staff, intensifying competition at the expense of collegiality and collaboration and an overall decrease in the quality of academic jobs and teaching. Although the discipline of anthropology can help us better understand our own conditions, the personalisation of problems and the focus on success obscure the anthropological lens, which looks at social and cultural structures of power and depends on critical reflexivity.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Learning and Teaching

The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences