Assessment rubrics

Thinking inside the boxes

in Learning and Teaching
Restricted access

Abstract

Assessment rubrics are being promoted and introduced into tertiary teaching practices on the grounds that they are an efficient and reliable tool to evaluate student performance effectively and promote student learning. However, there has been little discussion on the value of using assessment rubrics in higher education. Rather, they are being gradually and (seemingly) uncritically mainstreamed into tertiary teaching expectations and practices, often through professional development workshops. This article investigates the pedagogic value and validity of criteria-based assessment rubrics and the instrumental rationality and goals informing them. Drawing on a small body of criticism, the article explores an emerging discourse that contends that assessment rubrics are not capable of measuring and evaluating complex thinking skills. Rather, they limit the independent responses of students and the professional judgement of markers, encourage compliance jeopardising student commitment and creativity, and promote a false sense of objectivity in the marking and grading of student work.

Contributor Notes

Cary Bennett is a lecturer in Sociology at the University of New England, Australia. His research interests include drugs and drug use in society, health and illness, mental health, social aspects of HIV/AIDS, education and global development. He has conducted research and published in all these areas. Email: cary.bennett@une.edu.au

Learning and Teaching

The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences

  • ArterJ. and McTigheJ. (2001) Scoring Rubrics in the ClassroomThousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

  • AustinW. (2007) ‘The McDonaldization of nursing?Health 11 no. 2: 26572.

  • Australian Qualifications Framework Council (2013) Australian Qualifications Framework2nd ed. Australian Qualifications Framework Council: South Australiahttp://www.aqf.edu.au/ (accessed 21 July 2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BouletJ.R.RebbecchiT.A.DentonE.C.MckinleyD. and WhelanG.P. (2004) ‘Assessing the written communication skills of medical school graduatesAdvances in Health Sciences Education 9: 4760.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BradleyD. (2008) Review of Australian Higher EducationCanberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Brandeis University (n.d.) Grading Rubrics Created through the Davis Granthttp://www.brandeis.edu/writingprogram/uws/instructors/davisrubrics.html (accessed 12 October 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrysonC. and BlackwellR. (2006) ‘Managing temporary workers in higher education: Still at the margin?Personnel Review 35 no. 2: 20724.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carnegie Mellon University (n.d.) Appendix E: Sample Rubrics (Art Pre-Professional Social Science Science Humanities Internship Oral Communication) Eberly Center for Teaching Excellencehttps://www.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu/provost/documents/Assessment/Appendix-E-Sample-Rubrics-2011-02-17.pdf (accessed 12 October 2015).

  • ChunM.M. and MaroisR. (2002) ‘The dark side of visual attentionCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology 12 no. 2: 1849.

  • ClancyJ. and BallardB. (1997) Essay Writing for Students: A Practical Guide3rd ed. Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman.

  • DeanM. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern SocietyLondon: Sage.

  • DustinD. (2008) The McDonaldization of Social WorkAldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

  • EbleK.E. (1988) The Craft of Teaching: A Guide to Mastering the Professor’s Art2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • EndersJ. and MusselinC. (2008) ‘Back to the future? The academic professions in the 21st century’ in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (ed.) Higher Education to 2030 Vol. 1: Demography, Paris: OECD Publishing12550www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/41939654.pdf (accessed 3 July 2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GastonP. (2011) Rubric Used for Grading an Analytical Essay (Sociology) (This rubric was developed by Pablo Gaston and relies on the example rubrics presented by the GSI Teaching and Resource Center UC Berkeley. Developed for the Teagle and Spencer Foundation grant ‘Systematic Improvement of Undergraduate Education in Research Universities’ Professor Kim Voss project lead Department of Sociology 2011) https://teaching.berkeley.edu/sites/teaching.berkeley.edu/files/SociologyRubric_GradingAnalyticalEssay.pdf (accessed 5 August 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GoodrichH. (1996/97) ‘Understanding rubricsEducational Leadership 54 no. 4: 1417.

  • JacobyD. (2006) ‘Effects of part-time faculty employment on community college graduation ratesJournal of Higher Education 77 no. 6: 1081104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JonssonA. and SvingbyG. (2007) ‘The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequencesEducational Research Review 2: 13044.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KillenR. (2005) Programming and Assessment for Quality in Teaching and Learning; Southbank Victoria: Thomson Social Sciences Press.

  • KohnA. (2006) ‘The trouble with rubricsEnglish Journal 95 no. 4: 1215.

  • KohnA. (2012) ‘The case against gradesThe Educational Digest77 no. 5: 816.

  • LawsonW.D. (2001) ‘The McDonaldization of engineeringCivil Engineering Education Issues 2001 Proceedings of the Third National Congress478.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lazarsfeld-JensenA. and MorganK. (2009) ‘The vanishing idea of a scholarly life: workload calculations and the loss of academic integrity in Western SydneyAustralian Universities’ Review 51 no. 2: 629.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MabryL. (1999) ‘Writing to the rubric: lingering effects of traditional standardized testing on direct writing assessmentPhi Delta Kappan 80 no. 9: 6739.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MarginsonS. (2000) ‘Rethinking academic work in the global eraJournal of Higher education Policy and Management 22 no. 1: 2335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MayR.StrachanG.BroadbentK. and PeetzD. (2011) ‘The approach to university teaching: Time for a rethink?’ in: K. KrauseM. BuckridgeC. Grimmer and S. Purbrick-Illek (eds) Research and Development in Higher Education: Higher Education on the EdgeBrisbane: HERDSA18897.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MessickS. (1996) ‘Validity of performance assessments’ in G. Phillips (ed.) Technical issues in Large-scale Performance AssessmentWashington, DC: National Centre for Education Statistics118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MoskalB.M. and LeydensJ.A. (2000) ‘Scoring rubric development: validity and reliabilityPractical Assessment Research and Evaluation 7 no. 10: 7181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NorrisC. (1988) Deconstruction and the Interests of TheoryLondon: Pinter.

  • NussbaumM.C. (1997) Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defence of Reform in Liberal EducationCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OhanianS. (2013) ‘Standards, rubrics and dead frogsNew England Reading Association Journal 49 no. 1: 712.

  • Oregon State University (n.d.) Department of Sociology Assessment: Theory Rubric wic.oregonstate.edu/sites/…/deptsociologyassessmenttheoryrubric.pdf (accessed 8 August 2014).

  • OrrellJ. (2003) A Generic Learning Rubrichttps://teaching.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/upload-files/GenericAssessmentRubric.pdf (accessed 13 October 2015).

    • Export Citation
  • PercyA. and BeaumontR. (2008) ‘The casualisation of teaching and the subject of riskStudies in Continuing Education 30 no. 2: 14557.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ReddyY.M. and AndradeH. (2010) ‘A review of rubric use in higher educationAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 no. 4: 43548.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RedmanP. (2001) Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide2nd ed. London: Sage.

  • RitzerG. (1998) The McDonaldization Thesis: Exploration and ExtensionsLondon: Sage.

  • SadlerD.R. (2009) ‘Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and gradingAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 34 no. 2: 15979.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SimonsD.J. and ChabrisC.F. (1999) ‘Gorillas in our midst: sustainable inattentional blindness for dynamic eventsPerception 28: 105974.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithC. (2012) ‘Why should we bother with assessment moderation?Nurse Education Today 32: e45e48.

  • SpadyW.G. (2001) Beyond Counterfeit Reforms: Forging an Authentic Future for All LearnersLanham, Md: Scarecrow Education.

  • StevensD.D. and LeviA.J. (2005) Introduction to Rubrics: An Assessment Tool to Save Grading Time Convey Effective Feedback and Promote Student LearningSterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WigginsG. (1998) Educational AssessmentSan Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • WilsonM. (2007) ‘Why I won’t be using rubrics to respond to students’ writingEnglish Journal High School Edition 96 no. 4: 626.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WynyardR. and HayesD. (2002) The McDonaldization of Higher Education. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.