Assessment rubrics

Thinking inside the boxes

in Learning and Teaching
View More View Less
  • 1 University of New England, Australia cary.bennett@une.edu.au
Restricted access

Abstract

Assessment rubrics are being promoted and introduced into tertiary teaching practices on the grounds that they are an efficient and reliable tool to evaluate student performance effectively and promote student learning. However, there has been little discussion on the value of using assessment rubrics in higher education. Rather, they are being gradually and (seemingly) uncritically mainstreamed into tertiary teaching expectations and practices, often through professional development workshops. This article investigates the pedagogic value and validity of criteria-based assessment rubrics and the instrumental rationality and goals informing them. Drawing on a small body of criticism, the article explores an emerging discourse that contends that assessment rubrics are not capable of measuring and evaluating complex thinking skills. Rather, they limit the independent responses of students and the professional judgement of markers, encourage compliance jeopardising student commitment and creativity, and promote a false sense of objectivity in the marking and grading of student work.

Contributor Notes

Cary Bennett is a lecturer in Sociology at the University of New England, Australia. His research interests include drugs and drug use in society, health and illness, mental health, social aspects of HIV/AIDS, education and global development. He has conducted research and published in all these areas. Email: cary.bennett@une.edu.au

Learning and Teaching

The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences

  • Arter, J. and McTighe, J. (2001) Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom, Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

  • Austin, W. (2007) ‘The McDonaldization of nursing?Health 11, no. 2: 26572.

  • Australian Qualifications Framework Council (2013) Australian Qualifications Framework, 2nd ed., Australian Qualifications Framework Council: South Australia, http://www.aqf.edu.au/ (accessed 21 July 2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boulet, J.R., Rebbecchi, T.A., Denton, E.C., Mckinley, D. and Whelan, G.P. (2004) ‘Assessing the written communication skills of medical school graduates’, Advances in Health Sciences Education 9: 4760.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bradley, D. (2008) Review of Australian Higher Education, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Brandeis University (n.d.) Grading Rubrics Created through the Davis Grant, http://www.brandeis.edu/writingprogram/uws/instructors/davisrubrics.html (accessed 12 October 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bryson, C. and Blackwell, R. (2006) ‘Managing temporary workers in higher education: Still at the margin?Personnel Review 35, no. 2: 20724.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carnegie Mellon University (n.d.) Appendix E: Sample Rubrics (Art, Pre-Professional, Social Science, Science, Humanities, Internship, Oral Communication) Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence, https://www.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu/provost/documents/Assessment/Appendix-E-Sample-Rubrics-2011-02-17.pdf (accessed 12 October 2015).

  • Chun, M.M. and Marois, R. (2002) ‘The dark side of visual attention’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 12, no. 2: 1849.

  • Clancy, J. and Ballard, B. (1997) Essay Writing for Students: A Practical Guide, 3rd ed., Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman.

  • Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London: Sage.

  • Dustin, D. (2008) The McDonaldization of Social Work, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

  • Eble, K.E. (1988) The Craft of Teaching: A Guide to Mastering the Professor’s Art, 2nd ed., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Enders, J. and Musselin, C. (2008) ‘Back to the future? The academic professions in the 21st century’, in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (ed.), Higher Education to 2030, Vol. 1: Demography, Paris: OECD Publishing, 12550, www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/41939654.pdf (accessed 3 July 2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gaston, P. (2011) Rubric Used for Grading an Analytical Essay (Sociology) (This rubric was developed by Pablo Gaston and relies on the example rubrics presented by the GSI Teaching and Resource Center, UC Berkeley. Developed for the Teagle and Spencer Foundation grant, ‘Systematic Improvement of Undergraduate Education in Research Universities’ Professor Kim Voss, project lead, Department of Sociology, 2011) https://teaching.berkeley.edu/sites/teaching.berkeley.edu/files/SociologyRubric_GradingAnalyticalEssay.pdf (accessed 5 August 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goodrich, H. (1996/97) ‘Understanding rubrics’, Educational Leadership 54, no. 4: 1417.

  • Jacoby, D. (2006) ‘Effects of part-time faculty employment on community college graduation rates’, Journal of Higher Education 77, no. 6: 1081104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jonsson, A. and Svingby, G. (2007) ‘The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences’, Educational Research Review 2: 13044.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Killen, R. (2005) Programming and Assessment for Quality in Teaching and Learning; Southbank Victoria: Thomson Social Sciences Press.

  • Kohn, A. (2006) ‘The trouble with rubrics’, English Journal 95, no. 4: 1215.

  • Kohn, A. (2012) ‘The case against grades’, The Educational Digest, 77, no. 5: 816.

  • Lawson, W.D. (2001) ‘The McDonaldization of engineering’, Civil Engineering Education Issues 2001, Proceedings of the Third National Congress, 478.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lazarsfeld-Jensen, A. and Morgan, K. (2009) ‘The vanishing idea of a scholarly life: workload calculations and the loss of academic integrity in Western Sydney’, Australian Universities’ Review 51, no. 2: 629.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mabry, L. (1999) ‘Writing to the rubric: lingering effects of traditional standardized testing on direct writing assessment’, Phi Delta Kappan 80, no. 9: 6739.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marginson, S. (2000) ‘Rethinking academic work in the global era’, Journal of Higher education Policy and Management 22, no. 1: 2335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • May, R., Strachan, G., Broadbent, K. and Peetz, D. (2011) ‘The approach to university teaching: Time for a rethink?’, in: K. Krause, M. Buckridge, C. Grimmer and S. Purbrick-Illek (eds), Research and Development in Higher Education: Higher Education on the Edge, Brisbane: HERDSA, 18897.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Messick, S. (1996) ‘Validity of performance assessments’, in G. Phillips (ed.), Technical issues in Large-scale Performance Assessment, Washington, DC: National Centre for Education Statistics, 118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moskal, B.M. and Leydens, J.A. (2000) ‘Scoring rubric development: validity and reliability’, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7, no. 10: 7181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norris, C. (1988) Deconstruction and the Interests of Theory, London: Pinter.

  • Nussbaum, M.C. (1997) Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defence of Reform in Liberal Education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ohanian, S. (2013) ‘Standards, rubrics and dead frogs’, New England Reading Association Journal 49, no. 1: 712.

  • Oregon State University (n.d.) Department of Sociology Assessment: Theory Rubric, wic.oregonstate.edu/sites/…/deptsociologyassessmenttheoryrubric.pdf (accessed 8 August 2014).

  • Orrell, J. (2003) A Generic Learning Rubric, https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/upload-files/GenericAssessmentRubric.pdf (accessed 13 October 2015).

    • Export Citation
  • Percy, A. and Beaumont, R. (2008) ‘The casualisation of teaching and the subject of risk’, Studies in Continuing Education 30, no. 2: 14557.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reddy, Y.M. and Andrade, H. (2010) ‘A review of rubric use in higher education’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35, no. 4: 43548.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Redman, P. (2001) Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide, 2nd ed., London: Sage.

  • Ritzer, G. (1998) The McDonaldization Thesis: Exploration and Extensions, London: Sage.

  • Sadler, D.R. (2009) ‘Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 34, no. 2: 15979.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simons, D.J. and Chabris, C.F. (1999) ‘Gorillas in our midst: sustainable inattentional blindness for dynamic events’, Perception 28: 105974.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, C. (2012) ‘Why should we bother with assessment moderation?’, Nurse Education Today 32: e45e48.

  • Spady, W.G. (2001) Beyond Counterfeit Reforms: Forging an Authentic Future for All Learners, Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Education.

  • Stevens, D.D. and Levi, A.J. (2005) Introduction to Rubrics: An Assessment Tool to Save Grading Time, Convey Effective Feedback and Promote Student Learning, Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wiggins, G. (1998) Educational Assessment, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Wilson, M. (2007) ‘Why I won’t be using rubrics to respond to students’ writing’, English Journal, High School Edition 96, no. 4: 626.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wynyard, R. and Hayes, D. (2002) The McDonaldization of Higher Education. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 122 122 34
Full Text Views 28 28 1
PDF Downloads 9 9 1