What does it mean to teach ‘interpretively’?

in Learning and Teaching
View More View Less
  • 1 Rockefeller College, University at Albany jdodge@albany.edu
  • 2 Bryant University rholtzma@bryant.edu
  • 3 Tilburg University m.j.vanhulst@uvt.nl
  • 4 Wageningen University Dvora.Yanow@wur.nl
Restricted access

Abstract

The ‘interpretive turn’ has gained traction as a research approach in recent decades in the empirical social sciences. While the contributions of interpretive research and interpretive research methods are clear, we wonder: Does an interpretive perspective lend itself to – or even demand – a particular style of teaching? This question was at the heart of a roundtable discussion we organised at the 2014 Interpretive Policy Analysis (IPA) International Conference. This essay reports on the contours of the discussion, with a focus on our reflections upon what it might mean to teach ‘interpretively’. Prior to outlining these, we introduce the defining characteristics of an interpretive perspective and describe our respective experiences and interests in this conversation. In the hope that this essay might constitute the beginning of a wider conversation, we close it with an invitation for others to respond.

Contributor Notes

Jennifer Dodge is Assistant Professor of Public Administration and Policy at Rockefeller College, University at Albany, and a Book Reviews Editor of Critical Policy Studies. Her research interests include civil society organisations and public deliberation; public and social change leadership; and environmental politics. She practices and writes about qualitative research methods. Email: jdodge@albany.edu

Richard Holtzman is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Bryant University, USA. He teaches courses in American politics and has published articles on presidential rhetoric, narratives and discourse in American politics and the scholarship of teaching and learning. Email: rholtzma@bryant.edu

Merlijn van Hulst is an Associate Professor at Tilburg University, The Netherlands. He teaches courses in qualitative methods and organisation studies. His research focuses on public professionals in local governance, the police, narrative and framing. Email: m.j.vanhulst@uvt.nl

Dvora Yanow, a political and organisational ethnographer and interpretive methodologist and Guest Professor at Wageningen University, The Netherlands, is interested in the generation and communication of knowing and meaning in organisational and policy settings. Present research engages state-created categories for race-ethnic identity, immigrant integration policies and citizen-making practices; research ethics and their regulatory committees; practice studies; science-technology museums and the idea of science; and built spaces. She is spending 2016–2017 as a Senior Fellow at the Käte Hamburger Kolleg Centre for Global Cooperation Research at Duisburg-Essen University. Email: Dvora.Yanow@wur.nl

Learning and Teaching

The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences

  • Bentz, V.M. and Shapiro, J.J. (1998) Mindful Inquiry in Social Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Anchor.

  • Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Herder and Herder.

  • Harding, S. (1987) ‘Introduction: is there a feminist method?’ in S. Harding (ed.) Feminism and Methodology, Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press, 114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • hooks, b. (1994) Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom, New York: Routledge.

  • Norval, A. (2014) ‘Beyond deliberation: agonistic and aversive grammars of democracy: the question of criteria’, in A. Norval, S. Griggs and H. Wagenaar (eds) Practices of Freedom: Decentred Governance, Conflict, and Democratic Participation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 6084.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pader, E. (2014) ‘Seeing with an ethnographic sensibility: explorations beneath the surface of public policies’, in D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea (eds) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, 2nd ed., Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe, 194208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perry, W.G., Jr. (1970) Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  • Ricoeur, P. (1971) ‘The model of the text: meaningful action considered as text’, Social Research 38: 52962.

  • Rogers, C.R. (1980) A Way of Being, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Taylor, C. [1971] (1979)Interpretation and the sciences of man’, in P. Rabinow and W.M. Sullivan (eds) Interpretive Social Science: A Reader, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2571.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yanow, D. (2009) ‘Ways of knowing: passionate humility and reflective practice in research and management’, American Review of Public Administration 39, no. 6, 579601.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yanow, D. [2006] (2014)Thinking interpretively’, in D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea (eds) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, 2nd ed., Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 526.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P. (eds) [2006] (2014) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, 2nd ed., Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 84 84 7
Full Text Views 3 3 0
PDF Downloads 7 7 0