Mobilities, Crises, and Turns: Some Comments on Dissensus, Comparative Studies, and Spatial Histories

in Mobility in History
Author: Peter Merriman
View More View Less
Restricted access

In this article Merriman responds to Gijs Mom's suggestion that mobility historians should develop a common research agenda, formulate big questions, and adopt a transnational and comparative approach. In reply, Merriman suggests that dissensus and multiple approaches have their advantages, and highlights the ongoing importance of the national as a frame of understanding, as well as the importance of spatially sensitive approaches that pose clear challenges to comparative methodologies.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 25 25 7
Full Text Views 2 2 0
PDF Downloads 4 4 0