Analyzing Museum Collections in Scandinavia

New Insights in Revised Modernity and Its Implications on Archaeological Material

in Museum Worlds
Author:
Niklas Ytterberg Independent researcher Niklas.Ytterberg@bohuslansmuseum.se

Search for other papers by Niklas Ytterberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3167/armw.2016.040110
Keywords:
collections; museum; paradigm; politics; research strategies; Scandinavia
Restricted access

All currencies in US Dollar

PayPal Logo

ABSTRACT

This article emanates from studies and analyses of collections in cultural-historical museums in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway within the international research project CONTACT, concerning contacts between the aforementioned countries in southern Scandinavia during the Middle Neolithic (approximately 3000 BCE). This case study intends to raise questions related to research strategies at the museums holding the collections, in relation to the demand from research institutions using them. In what ways could these strategies coincide, and in what ways could they diverge? In what ways could we improve the research strategies for a better use of the collections?

Contributor Notes

NIKLAS YTTERBERG is an archaeologist working mainly in the contract archaeology field since the late 1990s. This has been done at a variety of companies, museums, and at the Swedish National Heritage Board. Besides the daily struggle with infrastructure projects, he has a keen research interest in Neolithic Scandinavia, megalithic monuments, and the final neolithization in the area. He has also been dedicated to the role of archaeology in contemporary society.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Museum Worlds

Advances in Research

Cover Museum Worlds
Article Category:
Research Article
Page Count:
12
Keywords:
collections; museum; paradigm; politics; research strategies; Scandinavia
Print Publication Date:
01 Jul 2016
Online Publication Date:
01 Jul 2016
Copyright:
© Berghahn Books 2016

  • Aronsson, Peter. 2012. “Writing the Museum.” Pp. 17–39 in Hegardt 2012a.

  • Bennet, Harry, and Graham J. Oliver. 1992. XRF Analysis of Ceramics, Minerals and Allied Materials.

  • British Ceramic Research Association, Ceram Research. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Bintliff, John, and Mark Pearce, eds. 2011. The Death of Archaeological Theory? Oxford: Oxbow Books.

  • Breisach, Ernst. 2009. On the Future of History: The Postmodernist Challenge and Its Aftermath. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Brorsson, Torbjörn. 2013. “A New Method to Determine the Provenance of Pottery: ICP Analyses of Pottery from Viking Age Settlements in Northern Europe.” Pp. 59–65 in Kulturwandel im Spannungsfeld von Tradition und Innovation: Festschrift für Michael Müller-Wille [Cultural change in the conflict of tradition and innovation: Commemorative for Michael Müller-Wille], ed. Sunhild Kleingärtner, Ulrich MuIler, and Jonathan Scheschkewitz. Neumünster: Wachholtz Verlag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Center for the Future of Museums. 2015. TrendsWatch 2015. American Alliance of Museums. www.aam.us.org/resources/center-for-the-future-of-museums/projects-and-reports/trendswatch.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chilton, Elizabeth S. 2014. “Plus ça Change: From Postprocessualism to ‘Big Data.’” Current Swedish Archaeology 22: 35–40.

  • Dikkaya, Fahri. 2009. “National Archaeologies and Conflicting Identities: Examples from Greece, Cyprus and Turkey. ANES 46: 117–137, doi: 10.2143/ANES.46.0.2040714.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Eagleton, Terry. 2003. After Theory. New York: Basic Books.

  • Fahlander, Fredrik. 2012. “Are We There Yet? Archaeology and the Postmodern in the New Millennium.” Current Swedish Archaeology 20: 109–129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • González-Ruibal, Alfredo. 2014. “Archeological Revolution(s).” Current Swedish Archaeology 22: 41–45.

  • Hegardt, Johan, ed. 2012a. The Museum Beyond the Nation. National Historical Museum, Studies 21. Stockholm: National Historical Museum.

  • Hegardt, Johan. 2012b. “Introduction.” Pp. 9–18 in Hegardt 2012a.

  • Hicks, Dan. 2010. “The Material-Cultural Turn: Event and Effect.” Pp. 25–98 in The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, ed. Dan Hicks and Mary C. Beaudry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hjertman, Martina, and Linda Lundberg. Forthcoming. Ny Varberg på djupet: Ett magasinsarkeologiskt projekt om bortglömda fynd och gamla synder [New Varberg at depth: A museum-archaeological project about forgotten artifacts and old sins]. Varberg: Hallands Kulturhistoriska Museum.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hodder, Ian. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationship between Humans and Things. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Hulthén, Birgitta. 1977. “On Ceramic Technology during the Scanian Neolithic and Bronze Age.” PhD diss., Theses and Papers in North-European Archaeology 5. Stockholm: Akademilitteratur.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Insoll, Timothy, ed. 2007. The Archaeology of Identities: A Reader. London and New York: Routledge.

  • Iversen, Rune, and Lutz Klassen. 2016. “‘CONTACT’: Et forskningsprojekt om grubekeramisk kultur.” [“CONTACT”: A research project concerning the Pitted Ware culture]. Fund and Fortid: Arkæologi for alle 1: 16–20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Johnson, Matthew H. 2006. “On the Nature of Theoretical Archaeology and Archaeological Theory.” Archaeological Dialogues 13(2): 117–132, doi: 10.1017/S138020380621208X.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Klassen, Lutz. 2015. “CONTACT: Et forskningsprojekt på Museum Østjylland.” [CONTACT: A research project at the East Jutland Museum]. Årbog 2015. Museum Østjylland, Randers Djursland: 132–139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kristiansen, Kristian. 2009a. “The Discipline of Archaeology.” Pp. 3–46 in The Oxford Handbook of Archaeology, ed. Barry Cunliffe, Chris Gosden, and Rosemary A. Joyce. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199271016.001.0001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kristiansen, Kristian. 2009b. “Contract Archaeology in Europe: An Experiment in Diversity.” World Archaeology: Debates in World Archaeology 41(4): 641–648.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kristiansen, Kristian. 2011. “Theory Does Not Die It Changes Direction.” Pp. 72–80 in Bintliff and Pearce 2011.

  • Kristiansen, Kristian. 2014. “Toward a New Paradigm? The Third Science Revolution and Its Possible Consequences in Archaeology.” Current Swedish Archaeology 22: 11–34.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Larsson, Stefan. 2014. “The Third Science Revolution and Its Possible Consequences in Archaeology: A Personal Reflection.” Current Swedish Archaeology 22: 53–56.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lidén, Kerstin, and Gunilla Eriksson. 2013. “Archaeology vs. Archaeological Science: Do We Have a Case?” Current Swedish Archaeology 21: 11–20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Historical Museum at Lund University. 2011. “Research Visits at Lund University Historical Museum (LUHM).” Policy document adopted by the Museum Committee at the Historical Museum, issued 1 April 2011. www.luhm.lu.se/Bilder/Research%20visits.pdf (accessed 10 December 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moioli, Pietro, and Claudio Seccaroni. 2000. “Analysis of Art Objects Using a Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer” in “Special Millennium Issue on Cultural Heritage,” ed. Eva Selin Lindgren. Special issue, X-Ray Spectrometry 29(1): 48–52.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Olsen, Bjørnar. 2003. “Material Culture after Text: Re-Membering Things.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 36(2): 2003: 87–104, doi 10.1080/00293650310000650.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Olsen, Bjørnar. 2006. “Archaeology, Hermeneutics of Suspicion and Phenomenological Trivialization.” Archaeological Dialogues 13(2): 144–150, doi: 10.1017/S1380203806242089.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Olsen, Bjørnar 2012. “After Interpretation: Remembering Archaeology.” Current Swedish Archaeology 20: 11–106.

  • Prescott, Christopher. 2013. “Archaeology vs. Science: Or Taking Knowledge-Based Communication Seriously?” Current Swedish Archaeology 21: 39–44.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Slovak, Nicole M., and Adina Paytan. 2011. “Applications of Sr Isotopes in Archaeology.” Pp. 743–768 in Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry: Advances in Isotope Geochemistry, ed. Mark Baskaran. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Solli, Brit. 2011. “Some Reflections on Heritage and Archaeology in the Anthropocene.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 44(1): 40–88, doi: 10.1080/00293652.2011.572677.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • SOU. 2015. Ny museipolitik: Museiutredningen 2014/15 [A new deal for museum politics: Investigation report about museums from the Swedish Government 2014–2015]. Statens offentliga utredningar SOU 2015:89. Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Suárez, Carlos Marín, David González Álvarez, and Pablo Alonzo González. 2012. “Building Nations in the XXI Century: Celticism, Nationalism and Archaeology in Northern Spain—The Case of Asturias and Leon.” Pp. 11–31 in Archaeology and the (De)Construction of National and Supra-National Polities, ed. Russel Ó Ríagáin and Cătălin Nicolae Popa. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, vol. 27.2. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Svensson, Carl-Johan. 2014. Festligt, folkligt, fullsatt? Offentlig debatt om Historiska museets publika verksamhet från Den Svenska Historien till Sveriges Historia [Festive, popular, crowed? Public debate about the public activities of the Swedish History Museum from The Swedish History to History of Sweden]. PhD diss., School of Education and Communication, Jönköping University, Dissertation Series no. 25, Jönköping. http://hj.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A716338anddswid=5644.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Swedish Exhibition Agency. 2016. Länsmuseernas situation: En konsultrapport från Kontingo på uppdrag av Riksutställningar [The situation for the regional museums: A consultant report at the request of the Swedish Exhibition Agency]. Stockholm: Riksutställningar. www.riksutstallningar.se/content/större-uppdrag-och-mindre-pengar-är-länsmuseernas-vardag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yoffee, Norman, and Andrew Sherratt, eds. 1993. Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1096 632 282
Full Text Views 23 7 0
PDF Downloads 21 7 0