The Magic of Bureaucracy

Repatriation as Ceremony

in Museum Worlds
Author:
Laura Peers University of Oxford laura.peers@prm.ox.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Laura Peers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

ABSTRACT

As a curator who has been responsible for the return of Indigenous human remains from a UK museum, I take as a starting point for this article the dossier of paperwork and the administrative acts required to negotiate the decision about a claim and de-accession; to meet requirements for export, customs, and airline transport; and effect the return of human remains. The administrative actions involved in repatriation are forms of ritual, performances of corporate identity, and relations of power. Although museum staff and claimant groups have different agendas in this process, and the nature of their rituals is quite different, administrative and claimant rituals are interdependent across the repatriation process. These intersecting, powerful actions have the same overarching functions for each group: to articulate identities, core values, and structures of power; to open the possibility of new aspects of identity; and to articulate ongoing tensions between majority society and minority claimant groups.

Contributor Notes

LAURA PEERS is Professor of Museum Anthropology in the School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, and Curator (Americas) at the Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford. E-mail: laura.peers@prm.ox.ac.uk

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Museum Worlds

Advances in Research

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

  • Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Bell, Catherine. (1992) 2009. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Classen, Constance, and David Howes. 2006. “The Museum as Sensescape: Western Sensibilities and Indigenous Artifacts.” In Sensible Objects: Colonialism, Museums and Material Culture, ed. Elizabeth Edwards, Chris Gosden, and Ruth Phillips, 199222. Oxford: Berg.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clifford, James. 2004. “Looking Several Ways: Anthropology and Native Heritage in Alaska.” Current Anthropology 45 (1): 530.

  • Collison, Nika, and Laura Peers. 2013. “Ceremonial Performance in the Museum Space: Repatriation and Relationships.” Paper presented at the “In the Balance: Indigeneity, Performance, Globalization” conference, Royal Holloway University, London, 24–27 October.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coombes, Annie. 1995. Reinventing Africa: Museums, Material Culture and Popular Imagination in Late Victorian and Edwardian England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eaton, Anne Wescott, and Ivan Gaskell. 2009. “Do Subaltern Artifacts Belong in Art Museums?” In The Ethics of Cultural Appropriation, ed. James O. Young and Conrad Brunk, 235267. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fforde, Cressida, Jane Hubert, and Paul Turnbull, eds. 2002. The Dead and Their Possessions: Repatriation in Principle, Policy and Practice. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fogelson, Ray. 1989. “The Ethnohistory of Events and Nonevents.” Ethnohistory 36 (2): 133147.

  • Gell, Alfred. 1992. “The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology.” In Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics, ed. Jeremy Coote and Anthony Shelton, 4066. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

  • Gurian, Elaine Heumann. 2004. “Singing and Dancing at Night.” In Stewards of the Sacred: Sacred Objects, Religious Culture and the Museum as Social Instituion, ed. Lawrence E. Sullivan and Alison Edwards, 8996. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kelly, John D., and Martha Kaplan. 1990. “History, Structure, and Ritual.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 119150.

  • Krmpotich, Cara. 2010. “Remembering and Repatriation: The Production of Kinship, Memory and Respect.” Journal of Material Culture 15 (2): 157179.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krmpotich, Cara, and Laura Peers. 2013. This Is Our Life: Haida Material Heritage and Changing Museum Practice. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lynch, Bernadette. 2011. “Collaboration, Contestation, and Creative Conflict: On the Efficacy of Museum/Community Partnerships.” In The Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics, ed. Janet Marstine, 146163. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lynch, Bernadette, and Samuel Alberti. 2010. “Legacies of Prejudice: Racism, Co-production and Radical Trust in the Museum.” Museum Management and Curatorship 25 (1): 1335.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, Jon P. 1996. “Ritual.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology, ed. Alan Barnard and Jonathan Spencer, 490493. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oxford University. 2006. “Policy on Human Remains Held by the University of Oxford’s Museums.” Oxford University Gazette 4787 (S2): 373377. https://www.ox.ac.uk/gazette/2006-7/supps/2_4787.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, Ruth. 1995. “Why Not Tourist Art? Significant Silences in Native American Museum Representations.” In After Colonialism: Imperial Histories and Post-Colonial Displacements, ed. Gyan Prakash, 98125. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, Ruth. 2005. “Re-placing Objects: Historical Practices for the Second Museum Age.” Canadian Historical Review 86 (1): 83110.

  • Sandell, Richard, and Eithne Nightingale. 2012. Museums, Equality and Social Justice. London: Routledge.

  • Schechner, Richard. 2003. Performance Theory. London: Routledge.

  • Simpson, Moira. 2001. Making Representations: Museums in the Post-colonial Era. London: Routledge.

  • Tythacott, Louise, and Kostas Arvanitis. 2014. Museums and Restitution: New Practices, New Approaches. Surrey: Ashgate.

  • Turner, Terence S. 1977. “Transformation, Hierarchy and Transcendence: A Reformulation of Van Gennep’s Model of the Structure of Rites de Passage.” In Secular Ritual, ed. Sally Falk Moore and Barbara G. Myerhoff, 5370. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turner, Victor. 1974. Dramas, Fields and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Turner, Victor. (1969) 1991. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure—The Lewis Henry Morgan Lectures 1966. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson, Kathleen. 2003. The Island Race: Englishness, Empire and Gender in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1840 903 126
Full Text Views 187 21 1
PDF Downloads 250 44 1