Contested Greenspace Solidarities?

Asymmetric Valuation Compromises and Civic-Material Tensions in Copenhagen Allotment Gardens

in Nature and Culture
Author:
Nicola C. ThomasPost-Doc Researcher, Hosei University in Tokyo, Japan nicolacharlotte.thomas.78@hosei.ac.jp

Search for other papers by Nicola C. Thomas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3757-787X
and
Anders BlokUniversity of Copenhagen, Denmark abl@soc.ku.dk

Search for other papers by Anders Blok in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3403-698X
Restricted access

Urban allotment gardens constitute urban natures with a rich history as well as potential public redevelopment land. While many cities in Europe struggle to protect allotment gardens from competing land-use forces, in Copenhagen, allotments are classified as valuable urban nature and enjoy special protection. We analyze the social and political conditions and consequences of this unique situation. Taking a closer look at the governance arrangements and what we refer to as asymmetric civic-public compromises enabling the protection, we show how this is resulting in new material conflicts between civic and municipal actors. We argue that the conflicts are related to the unresolved issue of competing visions of civic, green, and market sustainability shaping contemporary urban development in Copenhagen and beyond and which are starkly revealed within allotment gardens.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 374 374 55
Full Text Views 57 57 1
PDF Downloads 25 25 2