The OECD Water Governance Principles in Flood Risk Management

Understanding Conflicts and Frictions in Dutch Flood Protection

in Nature and Culture
Author:
Nadine KellerConsultant and Stakeholder Manager, Sweco, Netherlands Nadine.keller@hotmail.com

Search for other papers by Nadine Keller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Barbara TempelsWageningen University, The Netherlands barbara.tempels@wur.nl

Search for other papers by Barbara Tempels in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Thomas HartmannTU Dortmund University, Germany thomas.hartmann@tu-dortmund.de

Search for other papers by Thomas Hartmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The OECD Water Governance Principles provide a guideline for good water governance. However, these principles can conflict with each other when applied in practice. This contribution aims to understand which dilemmas arise and how such conflicts play out. It is explored in an in-depth case study on Dutch flood risk management in which conflicts between the principles emerge when applied to flood risk management practice. Interviews with water managers were used to collect data on which principles contradict each other and how these conflicts work out in practice. The study reveals that although the principles seem obvious, some principles indeed clash when applying them, while others do not lead to conflicts. Principles on efficiency, trust, and engagement have high potential for conflicts.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 559 559 78
Full Text Views 67 67 4
PDF Downloads 34 34 4