The OECD Water Governance Principles in Flood Risk Management

Understanding Conflicts and Frictions in Dutch Flood Protection

in Nature and Culture
Author:
Nadine Keller Consultant and Stakeholder Manager, Sweco, Netherlands Nadine.keller@hotmail.com

Search for other papers by Nadine Keller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Barbara Tempels Wageningen University, The Netherlands barbara.tempels@wur.nl

Search for other papers by Barbara Tempels in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Thomas Hartmann TU Dortmund University, Germany thomas.hartmann@tu-dortmund.de

Search for other papers by Thomas Hartmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The OECD Water Governance Principles provide a guideline for good water governance. However, these principles can conflict with each other when applied in practice. This contribution aims to understand which dilemmas arise and how such conflicts play out. It is explored in an in-depth case study on Dutch flood risk management in which conflicts between the principles emerge when applied to flood risk management practice. Interviews with water managers were used to collect data on which principles contradict each other and how these conflicts work out in practice. The study reveals that although the principles seem obvious, some principles indeed clash when applying them, while others do not lead to conflicts. Principles on efficiency, trust, and engagement have high potential for conflicts.

Contributor Notes

Nadine Keller is consultant and stakeholder manager in the field of flood risk management and planning at Sweco Netherlands. She studied the master Spatial Planning at Utrecht University. Her special expertise is in water governance, the OECD principles on water governance, and flood risk management. Nadine is currently doing her (external) PhD research at the the Landscape Architecture and Spatial Planning cluster at Wageningen University on the OECD principles on water governance and water management practice. E-Mail: Nadine.keller@hotmail.com

Barbara Tempels is assistant professor at the Department of Environmental Sciences at Wageningen University, The Netherlands. She is a spatial planner with expertise on flood resilience and environmental and spatial governance. She focuses on the spatial development and governance of flood risks, and more recently the integration of environmental and spatial policies. She has published on flood resilience, multi-layered water safety and actor-based approaches to spatial developments with reference to flood risks and urbanization. E-Mail: barbara.tempels@wur.nl.

Thomas Hartmann is the chair of land policy and land management at the school of spatial planning of TU Dortmund University, Germany. He is also affiliated with the Czech J.E.P. University in Ústí and Labem. Next to water governance, his research focuses on strategies of municipal land policy and the relation of flood risk management and property rights. He is also president of the international academic association on planning, law, and property rights (www.plpr-association.org) and vice-chair of the European COST Action LAND4FLOOD (www.land4flood.eu). E-Mail: thomas.hartmann@tu-dortmund.de.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Akhmouch, Aziza, Delphine Clavreul, and Peter. Glas. 2019. “Introducing the OECD Principles on Water Governance.” Water International 43 (1): 512. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1080/02508060.2017.1407561

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Akhmoch, Aziza, and Francisco N. Correia. 2016. “The 12 OECD Principles on Water Governance—When Science Meets Policy.” Utilities Policy 43 (A): 1420. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1016/j.jup.2016.06.004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barraqué, Bernard. 2014. “The Common Property Issue in Flood Control through Land Use in France. Journal of Flood Risk Management 10 (2): 182194. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1111/jfr3.12092.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bastemeijer, Teun., Alexandra Malmqvist, Fiona Meyer, and Donal O'Leary. 2012. “Condition for Success 1: Good Governance: Synthesis Report—Target 5, Integrity and Anti-Corruption Policies in the Water Sector.” 6th World Water Forum, Marseille. http://6.worldwaterforum.org/uploads/tx_amswwf/CS1_5__Integrity_and_anti-corruption_policies_Report.pdf (accessed 7 May 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bergsma, Emmy. 2016. “Changed Knowledge Requirements for Spatial Flood Governance.” Ecology and Society 21 (4): 40. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08952-210440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Butler, Catherine, and Nick Pidgeon. 2011. “From ‘Flood Defence’ to ‘Flood Risk Management’: Exploring Governance, Responsibility, and Blame.” Environment and Planning C 29 (3): 533547.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Driessen, Peter P. J., Dries L. T. Hegger, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz, Helena F. M. W. Van Rijswick, Ann Crabbé, Corinne Larrue, Piotr Matczak, Maria Pettersson, Sally Priest, Cathy Suykens, Gerrit T. Raadgever, and Mark Wiering. 2018. “Governance Strategies for Improving Flood Resilience in the Face of Climate Change.” Water 10: 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111595.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flick, Uwe. 2018. Doing Grounded Theory. A Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Fuchs, Sven. 2009. “Susceptibility versus Resilience to Mountain Hazards in Austria—Paradigms of Vulnerability Revisited.” Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9 (2): 337352. doi:10.5194/nhess-9-337-2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fuchs, Sven, Margreth Keiler, and Andreas Zischg. 2015. “A Spatiotemporal Multi-Hazard Exposure Assessment Based on Property Data.” Natural Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15 (9): 21272142. Doi:10.5194/nhess-15-2127-2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hartmann, Thomas and Tejo Spit (2015). “Towards an integrated water management—Comparing German and Dutch water law from a spatial planning perspective.” International Journal of Water Governance-2: 5978. DOI: 10.7564/14-IJWG68

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hegger, Dries L. T., Peter P. J. Driessen, Mark Wiering, Helena F. M. W. Van Rijswick, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz, Piotr Matczak, Ann Crabbé, Gerrit T. Raadgever, Marloes H. N. Bakker, Sally. J. Priest, Corinne Larrue, and Kristina Ek. 2016. “Toward More Flood Resilience: Is a Diversification of Flood Risk Management Strategies the Way Forward?Ecology and Society 21 (4): 52. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08854-210452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoogheemraadschap Hollands Noorderkwartier. 2018. Waterprogramma 2016–2021 (WBP 5).

  • IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change). 2012. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jorissen, Richard, Erik Kraaij, and Ellen Tromp. 2016. “Dutch Flood Protection Policy and Measures Based on Risk Assessment.” 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. 10.1051/e3sconf/20160720016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keller, Nadine, and Thomas Hartmann. 2020. “OECD Water Governance Principles on the Local Scale—An Exploration in Dutch Water Management.” International Journal of River Basin Management 18 (4): 439444. DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2019.1653308.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krozer, Yoram, Sharon Hophmayer-Tokich, Hans van Meerendonk, Simon Tijsma, and Eric Vos. 2010. “Innovations in the Water Chain—Experiences in The Netherlands.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (5): 439446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Medema, Jeroen. 2019. Joint Fact Finding: Samen op zoek naar de feiten. WesselinkVanZijst.

  • Mors ter, Arjan, and Erik Plas. 2020. Coronacrisis en bouwcontracten. Bouwrecht 6 (38): 249255.

  • OECD (Organization on Economic Cooperation and Development). 2014. Water Governance in the Netherlands: Fit for the Future? OECD Studies on Water, OECD Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OECD. 2015. OECD Principles on Water Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/governance/regional-policy/OECDPrinciples-on-Water-Governance.pdf (accessed on 17 May 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OECD. 2019. Applying the OECD Principles on Water Governance to Floods: A Checklist for Action. Paris: OECD Studies on Water. https://doi.org/10.1787/d5098392-en.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rijksoverheid (n.d.) Nieuwe omgevingswet maakt omgevingsrecht eenvoudiger. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/omgevingswet/vernieuwing-omgevingsrecht.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Romano, Oriana, and Aziza Akhmouch. 2019. “Water Governance in Cities: Current Trends and Future Challenges.” Water 11 (3): 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030500.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roth, Dirk, and Jeroen Warner. 2007. “Flood Risk, Uncertainty and Changing River Protection Policy in the Netherlands: The Case of ‘Calamity Polders’.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 98 (4): 519525. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00419.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seijger, Chris, Stijn Brouwer, Arwin van Buuren, Herman K. Gillissen, Marleen van Rijswick, and Michelle Hendriks. 2018. “Functions of OECD Water Governance Principles in Assessing Water Governance Practices: Assessing the Dutch Flood Protection Programme.” Water International 43 (1): 90108. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1080/02508060.2018.1402607

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strauss, Anselm L., and Juliet M. Corbin. 1990. The Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tempels, Barbara, and Thomas Hartmann. 2014. “A Co-Evolving Frontier between Land and Water: Dilemmas of Flexibility versus Robustness in Flood Risk Management. Water International 39 (6): 872883. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1080/02508060.2014.958797.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thaler, Thomas, and Meike Levin-Keitel. 2016. “Multi-Level Stakeholder Engagement in Flood Risk Management: A Question of Roles and Power—Lessons from England.” Environmental Science & Policy 55 (1): 292301.https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thaler, Thomas, and Thomas Hartmann. 2016. “Justice and Flood Risk Management: Reflecting on Different Approaches to Distribute and Allocate Flood Risk Management in Europe.” Natural Hazards 83 (1): 129147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2305-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thornberg, Robert, and Kathy Charmaz. 2014. “Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, ed. Uwe Flick, 153169. London: Sage.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verdaas, Co J. 2020. Waarom we de Omgevingswet toch moeten omarmen. Gebiedsontwikkeling.nu. https://www.gebiedsontwikkeling.nu/artikelen/waarom-we-de-omgevingswet-tochmoeten-omarmen/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woodhouse, Philip, and Mike Muller. 2017. “Water Governance: An Historical Perspective on Current Debates.” World Development 92: 225241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • World Economic Forum. 2021. The Global Risks Report 2021. 16th ed: Insight report.

  • World Water Assessment Programme (2003). Water for People, Water for Life. The United Nations World Water Development Report.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 6342 4704 285
Full Text Views 127 4 0
PDF Downloads 91 6 0