One Hundred Years of Photoplay: Hugo Münsterberg’s Lasting Contribution to Cognitive Movie Psychology

in Projections
Author:
Andreas Baranowski Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz baranowski@uni-mainz.de

Search for other papers by Andreas Baranowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Heiko Hecht Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz hecht@uni-mainz.de

Search for other papers by Heiko Hecht in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

One hundred years ago, in 1916, Hugo Münsterberg was the first psychologist to publish a book on movie psychology, entitled The Photoplay: A Psychological Study. We revisit this visionary text, which was an anticipation of the field of cognitive movie psychology. We use the structure of his book to look into advances that have been made within the field and evaluate whether Münsterberg’s initial claims and predictions have borne out. We comment on the empirical development of film studies regarding perceived depth and movement, attention, memory, emotion, and esthetics of the photoplay. We conclude that the most of Münsterberg’s positions remain surprisingly topical one hundred years later.

Contributor Notes

Andreas Baranowski studied psychology at the universities of Klagenfurt and Salamanca. He finished his studies in 2011 with a master’s degree in psychology. Since 2011, he has been a research assistant in the Department of Experimental Psychology at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, where he earned his PhD in 2016. His research focuses on visual perception and cognitive movie psychology. E-mail: baranowski@uni-mainz.de

Heiko Hecht studied psychology and philosophy at the University of Trier and psychology at the University of Virginia, where he received his PhD. He has held positions at the University of Munich (LMU), NASA’s Ames Research Center, the Center for Interdisciplinary Research at Bielefeld University, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Since 2002, he has been professor of experimental psychology at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz. His research focuses on still and moving images, intuitive physics, and virtual reality. E-mail: hecht@uni-mainz.de

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Projections

The Journal for Movies and Mind

  • Anderson, Joseph D. 1998. The Reality of Illusion: An Ecological Approach to Cognitive Film Theory. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, Joseph D., and Barbara Fisher. 1978. “The Myth of Persistence of Vision.” Journal of the University Film Association 30 (4): 38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arnheim, Rudolf. 1932 (1957). Film als Kunst. Berlin: Ernst Rowohlt. Translated as Film as Art (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baddeley, Alan. 2009. “Autobiographical Memory.” In Memory, ed. Alan Baddeley, Michael W. Eysenck, and Michael C. Anderson. 137162. New York: Psychology Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baranowski, Andreas M., and Heiko Hecht. 2014. “The Big Picture: Effects of Surround on Immersion and Size Perception.” Perception 43 (10): 10611070.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baranowski, Andreas M., and Heiko Hecht. 2017a. “Effect of Camera Angle on Perception of Trust and Attractiveness.” Empirical Studies of the Arts, first published 30 May: 111. doi:10.1177/0276237417710762.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baranowski, Andreas M., and Heiko Hecht. 2017b. “The Auditory Kuleshov Effect: Multi-sensory Integration in Movie Editing.” Perception 46 (5): 18. doi:0.1177/0301006616682754.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baranowski, Andreas M., and Heiko Hecht. Forthcoming. “Canned Emotions: Effects of Genre and Audience Reaction on Emotions Elicited in Movies.” Art and Perception.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baranowski, Andreas M., Kristine Keller, Julia Neumann, and Heiko Hecht. 2016. “Genre-dependent Effects of 3D Film on Presence, Motion Sickness, and Protagonist Perception.” Displays 44: 5359. doi:10.1016/j.displa.2016.06.004.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barratt, Daniel, Anna Cabak Rédei, Åse Innes-Ker, and Joost van de Weijer. 2016. “Does the Kuleshov Effect Really Exist? Revisiting a Classic Film Experiment on Facial Expressions and Emotional Contexts.” Perception 45 (8): 847874. doi:10.1177/0301006616638595.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baudry, Jean-Louis. 1974. “Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus.” Film Quarterly 28 (8): 3947.

  • Berg, David J., Susane E. Boehnke, Robert A. Marino, Douglas P. Munoz, and Laurent Itti. 2009. “Free Viewing of Dynamic Stimuli by Humans and Monkeys.” Journal of Vision 9 (19): doi:10.1167/9.5.19.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blanz, Volker, Michael J. Tarr, and Thomas V. Bülthoff. 1999. “What Object Attributes Determine Canonical Views?Perception 28 (5): 575599.

  • Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the Fiction Film. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Bordwell, David, and Kristin Thompson. 2010. Film Art: An Introduction. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Brownlow, Kevin. 1980. “Silent Films: What Was the Right Speed?Sight and Sound 49 (3): 164167.

  • Cook, David A. 2004. A History of Narrative Film. 4th ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

  • Cutting, James E., Jordan E. DeLong, and Christine E. Nothelfer. 2010. “Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film.” Psychological Science 21 (3): 440447. doi:10.1177/0956797610361679.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cutting, James E., Kaitlin L. Brunick, Jordan E. DeLong, Catalina Iricinschi, and Aysen Candan. 2011. “Quicker, Faster, Darker: Changes in Hollywood Film over 75 Years.” i-Perception 2 (6): 569576. doi:10.1068/i0441aap.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Danziger, Kurt. 1982. “Mid-Nineteenth-Century British Psycho-Physiology: A Neglected Chapter in the History of Psychology.” In The Problematic Science: Psychology in Nineteenth-Century Thought, ed. William R. Woodward and Mitchell G. Ash, 119146. New York: Praeger.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dorr, Michael, Thomas Martinetz, Karl R. Gegenfurtner, and Erhardt Barth. 2010. “Variability of Eye Movements When Viewing Dynamic Natural Scenes.” Journal of Vision 10 (10). doi:10.1167/10.10.28.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Enticknap, Leo. 2005. Moving Image Technology: From Zoetrope to Digital. London: Wallflower Press.

  • Faraday, Michael. 1831. “On a Peculiar Class of Optical Deceptions.” Journal of the Royal Institute of Great Britain 1: 205223.

  • Finlay, David J., and Peter Dodwell. 1987. “Speed of Apparent Motion and the Wagon-Wheel Effect.” Perception and Psychophysics 41 (1): 2934. doi:10.3758/BF03208210.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Finlay, David J., Peter C. Dodwell, and Terry M. Caelli,. 1984. “The Wagon-Wheel Effect.” Perception 13 (3): 237248. doi:10.1068/p130237.

  • Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Goldstein, E. Bruce. 2013. Sensation and Perception. 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

  • Goldstein, Robert B., Russell L. Woods, and Eli Peli. 2007. “Where People Look When Watching Movies: Do All Viewers Look at the Same Place?Computers in Biology and Medicine 37 (7): 957964.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grodal, Torben. 1999. Moving Pictures: A New Theory of Film Genres, Feelings, and Cognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Grodal, Torben. 2009. Embodied Visions: Evolution, Emotion, Culture, and Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hart, Bernard M., Johannes Vockeroth, Frank Schumann, Klaus Bartl, Erich Schneider, Peter König, and Wolfgang Einhäuser. 2009. “Gaze Allocation in Natural Stimuli: Comparing Free Exploration to Head-Fixed Viewing Conditions.” Visual Cognition 17 (6–7): 11321158.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasson, Uri, Ohad Landesman, Barbara Knappmeyer, Ignacio Vallines, Nava Rubin, and David J. Heeger. 2008. “Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film.” Projections 2 (1): 126.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heider, Fritz, and Marianne A. Simmel. 1944. “An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior.” American Journal of Psychology 57 (2): 243259.

  • Henderson, John M., and Andrew Hollingworth. 1999. “The Role of Fixation Position in Detecting Scene Changes across Saccades.” Psychological Science 10 (5): 428442.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hochberg, Julian. 1986. “Representation of Motion and Space in Video and Cinematic Displays.” In Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol. 1. Sensory Processing and Perception, ed. Kenneth R. Boff, Lloyd Kaufman, and James P. Thomas, 164. New York: Wiley.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hochberg, Julian, and Virginia Brooks. 1978. “Film Cutting and Visual Momentum.” In Eye Movements and the Higher Psychological Functions, ed. John W. Senders, Dennis F. Fisher, and Richard A. Monty, 293313. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hochberg, Julian, and Virginia Brooks. 1996. “The Perception of Motion Picture.” In Cognitive Ecology, ed. Morton P. Friedman and Edward C. Carterette, 205292. San Diego: Academic Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffner, Cynthia A., and Kenneth J. Levine. 2005. “Enjoyment of Mediated Fright and Violence: A Meta-analysis.” Media Psychology 7 (2): 207237.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huff, Markus, and Stephan Schwan. 2012. “Do Not Cross the line: Heuristic Spatial Updating in Dynamic Scenes.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 19 (9): 10651072. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0293-z.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ijsselsteijn, Wijnand A., Huib de Ridder, Roelof Hamberg, Don J. Bouwhuis, and Jonathan Freeman. 1998. “Perceived Depth and the Feeling of Presence in 3DTV.” Displays 18 (4): 207214.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaufman, Lloyd. 1974. Sight and Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Kline, Keith, Alex Holcombe, and David M. Eagleman. 2004. “Illusory Motion Reversal Is Caused by Rivalry, Not by Perceptual Snapshots of the Visual Field.” Vision Research 44 (23): 26532658. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.030.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Konkle, Talia, and Auda Oliva. 2011. “Canonical Visual Size for Real-World Objects.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 37 (1): 2337.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kooi, Frank L., and Alexander Toet. 2004. “Visual Comfort of Binocular and 3D Displays.” Displays 25 (2–3): 99108.

  • Koriat, Asher, Morris Goldsmith, and Ainat Pansky. 2000. “Toward a Psychology of Memory Accuracy.” Annual Review Psychology 51: 481537.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lambooij, Marc T. M., Wijnand A. Ijsselsteijn, Marten F. Fortuin, and Ingrid E. J. Heynderickx. 2009. “Visual Discomfort and Visual Fatigue in Stereoscopic Displays: A Review.” Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 53 (3): 114.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Landis, Carney. 1954. “Determinants of the Critical Flicker-Fusion Threshold.” Physiological Reviews 34 (2): 259286.

  • Langdale, Allan. 2002. Hugo Münsterberg on Film: The Photoplay: A Psychological Study and Other Writings. New York: Routledge.

  • Mannan, Sabira K., Keith H. Ruddock, and David S. Wooding. 1995. “Automatic Control of Saccadic Eye Movements Made in Visual Inspection of Briefly Presented 2-D Images.” Spatial Vision 9 (3): 363386.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marchant, Paul R., David Raybould, Renshaw, and Richard Stevens. 2009. “Are You Seeing What I’m Seeing? An Eye-Tracking Evaluation of Dynamic Scenes.” Digital Creativity 20 (3): 153163.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marbe, Karl. 1910. Theorie der kinematographischen Projektionen [Theory of the cinematographic projection]. Leipzig: Johann Amborsius Barth.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Messaris, Paul. 1994. Visual Literacy: Image, Mind, and Reality. Boulder, CO: Westview.

  • Metz, Christian. 1991. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Mital, Parag K., Tim J. Smith, Robin L. Hill, and John M. Henderson. 2011. “Clustering of Gaze during Dynamic Scene Viewing Is Predicted by Motion.” Cognitive Computation 3 (1): 524.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mobbs, Dean, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Hakwan C. Lau, Eric Featherstone, Ray J. Dolan, and Chris D. Frith. 2006. “The Kuleshov Effect: The Influence of Contextual Framing on Emotional Attributions.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 1 (2): 95106.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Münsterberg, Hugo. 1916. The Photoplay: A Psychological Study. New York: Appleton.

  • Neisser, Ulric. 1967. Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Nyström Marcus, and Kenneth Holmqvist. 2010. “Effect of Compressed Offline Foveated Video on Viewing Behavior and Subjective Quality.” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 6 (1): 4:1–4:14.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oatley, Keith. 2013. “How Cues on the Screen Prompt Emotions in the Mind.” In Shimamura 2013: 165191.

  • Oatley, Keith, and Nicola Yuill. 1985. “Perception of Personal and Inter-personal Action in a Cartoon Film.” British Journal of Social Psychology 24 (2): 115124.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paluck, Elizabeth L., Paul Lagunes, Donald P. Green, Lynn Vavreck, Limor Peer, and Robin Gomila. 2015. “Does Product Placement Change Television Viewers’ Social Behavior?PLoS ONE 10 (9): e0138610. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138610.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pashler, Harold. 1998. Attention. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

  • Purves, Dale, Joseph Paydarfar, and Timothy Andrews. 1996. “The Wagon Wheel Illusion in Movies and Reality.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 (8): 36933697. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.8.3693.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Read, Jenny C., and Iwo Bohr. 2014. “User Experience while Viewing Stereoscopic 3D Television.” Ergonomics 57 (8): 11401153.

  • Sawahata, Yasuhito, Rajiv Khosla, Kazuteru Komine, Nobuyuki Hiruma, Takayuki Itou, Seiji Watanabe, Yuji Suzuki, Yumiko Hara, and Nobuo Issiki. 2008. “Determining Comprehension and Quality of TV Programs using Eye-Gaze Tracking.” Pattern Recognition 41 (5): 16101626.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schacter, Daniel L. and Karl K. Szpunar. 2015. “Enhancing Attention and Memory during Video-Recorded Lectures.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 1 (1): 6071. doi:10.1037/stl0000011.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schneider, Tobias Matthias, and Claus-Christian Carbon. 2015. “On the Genesis and Processing of Facial Representations and Prototypes.” Presentation at the European Conference on Visual Perception, Liverpool, 23–27 August.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schreiber, Benjamin E., Junaid Fukuta, and Fabiana Gordon. 2010. “Live Lecture versus Video Podcast in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Randomised Controlled Trial.” BMC Medical Education 10 (68): doi:10.1186/1472–6920-10-68.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwan, Stephan. 2013. “The Art of Simplifying Events.” In Shimamura 2013: 165191.

  • Schwan, Stephan, and Bärbel Garsoffky. 2004. “The Cognitive Representation of Filmic Event Summaries.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 18 (1): 3755.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwan, Stephan, and Sermin Ildirar. 2010. “Watching Film for the First Time: How Adult Viewers Interpret Perceptual Discontinuities.” Psychological Science 21 (7): 970976.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sevenants, Aline, and Géry d’Ydewalle. 2006. “Does It Matter to Be Pictured from Below?Psychologica Belgica 46 (3): 199210.

  • Shimamura, Arthur P. Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Smith, Tim J. 2013. “Watching You Watch Movies: Using Eye Tracking to Inform Cognitive Film Theory.” In Shimamura 2013: 165191.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, Tim J., and John M. Henderson. 2008. “Attentional Synchrony in Static and Dynamic Scenes.” Journal of Vision 8 (6). doi:10.1167/8.6.773.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith Tim J., and Parag K. Mital. 2011. “Watching the World Go By: Attentional Prioritization of Social Motion during Dynamic Scene Viewing.” Journal of Vision 11 (11). doi:10.1167/11.11.478.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sobchack, Thomas, and Vivian C. Sobchack. 1980. An Introduction to Film. 2nd ed. Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.

  • Solomon, David J., Gary S. Ferenckick, Heather S. Laird-Fick, and Kevin Kavanaugh. 2004. “A Randomized Trail Comparing Digital and Live Lecture Formats.” BMC Medical Education 4 (27). doi:10.1186/1472-6920-4-27.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steinman, Robert M., Zygmunt Pizlo, and Filip J. Pizlo. 2000. “Phi Is Not Beta, and Why Wertheimer’s Discovery Launched the Gestalt Revolution: A Minireview.” Vision Research 40 (17): 22572264.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stelmach, Lew B., Wa James Tam, and Paul J. Hearty. 1991. “Static and Dynamic Spatial Resolution in Image Coding: An Investigation of Eye Movements.” SPIE Proceedings 1453: Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display II, 147 (1 June). doi:10.1117/12.44351.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Suckfüll, Monika. 2013. “Emotion Regulation by Switching between Modes of Reception.” In Shimamura 2013: 165191.

  • Tan, Ed S. 1996. Emotion and the Structure of Narrative Film: Film as an Emotion Machine. London: Routledge.

  • Thomas, Frank, and Ollie Johnston. 1981. The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation. New York: Simon & Schuster.

  • Thompson, Kristin, and David Bordwell. 2009. Film History: An Introduction. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Tulving Endel. 1983. Elements of Episodic Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Van Dijk, Wilco W., and Jaap W. Ouwerkerk. 2014. Schadenfreude: Understanding Pleasure at the Misfortune of Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vig, Eleonora, Michael Dorr, and Ehardt Barth. 2009. “Efficient Visual Coding and the Predictability of Eye Movements on Natural Movies.” Spatial Vision 22 (5): 397408. doi:10.1163/156856809789476065.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vishwanath, Dharaj, Ahna R. Girshic, and Martin S. Banks. 2005. “Why Pictures Look Right When Viewed from the Wrong Place.” Nature Neuroscience 8 (10): 14011410. doi:10.1038/nn1553.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wertheimer, Max. 1912. “Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung” [Experimental study of seeing and movement]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 61 (1): 161265.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wiseman, Richard. 2009. Quirkology: The Curious Science of Everyday Lives. Philadelphia: Basic Books.

  • Yarbus, Alfred L. 1967. Eye Movements and Vision. New York: Plenum Press.

  • Yang, Shun-nan N., Tawny Schlieski, Brent Selmins, Scott C. Cooper, Rina A. Doherty, Philip J. Corriveau, and James E. Sheedy. 2012. “Stereoscopic Viewing and Reported Perceived Immersion and Symptoms.” Optometry and Vision Science 89 (7): 10681080.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zukor, Adolph. 1953. The Public Is Never Wrong: My 50 Years in the Picture Industry. New York: G. P. Putnam.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 4079 1841 362
Full Text Views 67 6 0
PDF Downloads 58 14 1