Naturalized Aesthetics and Criticism

On Value Judgments

in Projections
View More View Less
  • 1 William Paterson University disummaknoopl@wpunj.edu
Restricted access

Abstract

Can naturalized aesthetics contribute to the evaluation of a work? In this article, I consider three ways in which naturalized aesthetics may inform critical evaluation. First, I analyze the role of naturalized aesthetic analysis in the formation of the creative choices made by filmmakers. Second, I assess the relationship between the analysis of empathy provided by Murray Smith’s Film, Art, and the Third Culture and the expression of moral evaluations. And third, I outline what I take to be naturalized aesthetics’ promising potential contribution to the study of genre and contra-standard features. In the concluding section, I instead introduce what I take to be two rather serious difficulties to a cooperation between criticism and naturalized aesthetics.

Contributor Notes

Laura T. Di Summa-Knoop is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at William Paterson University. Her research focuses mainly on aesthetics, on the philosophy of motion pictures, and on aesthetic practices that affect our daily life and identity. Email: disummaknoopl@wpunj.edu

Projections

The Journal for Movies and Mind

  • Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image – Music – Text. New York: Noonday Press.

  • Carroll, Noël. 1987. “The Nature of Horror.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 46 (1): 5159.

  • Carroll, Noël. 2000. “Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research.” Ethics 110 (2): 350387.

  • Carroll, Noël, and William Seeley. 2014. “Cognitive Theory and the Individual Film: The Case of Rear Window.” In Cognitive Media Theory, ed. Ted Nannicelli and Paul Taberham, 235253. New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Friend, Stacie. 2012. “Fiction as Genre.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (2): 179209.

  • Gaut, Berys. 1998. “The Ethical Criticism of Art.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, ed. Jerrold Levinson, 182203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gilchrist, Andrew. 2014. “It’s a Wonderful Life: My Most Overrated Christmas Movie.” The Guardian, 22 December. https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2014/dec/22/most-overrated-christmas-movie-its-a-wonderful-life.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jacobson, David. 2011. “Fitting Attitude Theories of Value.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fitting-attitude-theories/. Accessed on 6/14/2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kivy, Peter. 1997. “The Laboratory of Fictional Truth.” In Philosophies of Arts: An Essay in Differences, 121139. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sinnerbrink, Robert. 2015. Cinematic Ethics: Exploring Ethical Experience Through Film. New York: Routledge.

  • Smith, Murray. 1995. Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Smith, Murray. 2017. Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Walton, Kendall. 1970. “Categories of Art.” Philosophical Review 79 (3): 334367.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 17 17 3
Full Text Views 16 16 2
PDF Downloads 18 18 0