Collaboration in the Third Culture

in Projections
Restricted access

Abstract

In Film, Art, and the Third Culture, Murray Smith articulates and defends a naturalized aesthetics of film that exemplifies a “third culture,” integrating the insights and methods of the natural sciences with those of the arts and humanities. By contrast with skeptics, who reject the relevance of psychology and neuroscience to the study of film and art, I agree with Smith that we should embrace the third-cultural project. However, I argue here that Smith does not go far enough in developing this project. In defending the contribution of the natural sciences to film aesthetics as traditionally conceived in the arts and humanities, Smith focuses on only one side of the equation, unduly limiting the potential contribution of the arts and humanities to the scientific study of film. Using the example of emotional responses to fiction film, I propose that we adopt a more genuinely integrative approach.

Contributor Notes

Stacie Friend is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London. She has published widely in the philosophies of art, language, and mind, especially concerning our engagement with fictional literature and film. She has been a British Academy / Leverhulme Trust Senior Research Fellow, and has held visiting professorships at the University of Barcelona and the Institut Jean Nicod / École Normale Supérieure. She is the president of the British Society of Aesthetics, an organizer of the London Aesthetics Forum, and a co-investigator on the Leverhulme Trust Research Project “Learning from Fiction: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives” (2018–2021). Email: s.friend@bbk.ac.uk

Projections

The Journal for Movies and Mind

  • CovaFlorian and Stacie Friend. Forthcoming. “How Does Fiction Elicit Emotions?” In The Routledge Handbook of Emotion Theory ed. Andrea Scarantino. New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CovaFlorianAmanda García and Vanessa Sennwald. n.d. “Is What I’m Feeling Really Genuine? Fiction vs. Reality.” Unpublished manuscript.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DengYalingMeng Yang and Renlai Zhou. 2017. “A New Standardized Emotional Film Database for Asian Culture.” Frontiers in Psychology 8 (1941). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01941.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FlanaganOwen. 1992. Consciousness Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

  • FriendStacie. 2016. “Fiction and Emotion.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination ed. Amy Kind217229. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LevensonRobert W. 2003. “Autonomic Specificity and Emotion.” In Handbook of Affective Sciences ed. Richard J. DavidsonKlaus R. Scherer and H. Hill Goldsmith212224. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RadfordColin. 1975. “How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49 (Suppl.): 6780.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RamachandranVilayanur S. and William Hirstein. 1999. “The Science of Art: A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (6–7): 1541.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RobinsonJenefer. 2005. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and Its Role in Literature Music and Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • SmithMurray. 2011. “Empathy, Expansionism, and the Extended Mind.” In Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives ed. Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie99117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithMurray. 2017. Film Art and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • SnowC. P. 1956. “The Two Cultures.” New Statesman6 October. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139196949.

  • SperdutiMarcoMargherita ArcangeliDominique MakowksiPrany WantzenTiziana ZallaStéphane LemaireJérôme Dokic et al. 2016. “The Paradox of Fiction: Emotional Response toward Fiction and the Modulatory Role of Self-Relevance.” Acta Psychologica 165: 5359. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.02.003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UhrigMeike K.Nadine TrautmannUlf BaümgartnerRolf-Detlef TreedeFlorian HenrichWolfgang Hiller and Susanne Marschall. 2016. “Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films.” Frontiers in Psychology 7 (180). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation