Todd Berliner's Hollywood Aesthetic advances an original perspective on Hollywood filmmaking by insisting on its fundamentally aesthetic character, and exploring its particular aesthetic features with the tools of neoformalist film analysis, cognitive psychology, and the philosophy of art. I focus on two of the book's most ambitious claims: a) that appreciation of the style of Hollywood films can play an important role in our experience of them, over and above its role in representing and expressively dramatizing narrative elements; and b) that the ideological dimension of Hollywood filmmaking serves its aesthetic purposes, rather than vice versa. I conclude by noting a common root to the resistance likely to greet Berliner's two bold inversions of conventional wisdom on narrative, style, aesthetics, and ideology.
Murray Smith is Professor of Film and co-director of the Aesthetics Research Centre at the University of Kent. He was President of the Society for Cognitive Studies of the Moving Image from 2014–17, and a Laurance S. Rockefeller Fellow at Princeton University's Center for Human Values for 2017–18. His Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film has just appeared in paperback, while a revised edition of Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema is due out later this year, both with Oxford University Press.
Raney, Arthur A. 2004. “Expanding Disposition Theory: Reconsidering Character Liking, Moral Evaluations, and Enjoyment.” Communication Theory14 (4): 348–369. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00319.x.
Raney, Arthur A. 2004. “Expanding Disposition Theory: Reconsidering Character Liking, Moral Evaluations, and Enjoyment.” Communication Theory 14 (4): 348–369. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00319.x.)| false