Carroll on the Emotion of Horror

in Projections
View More View Less
  • 1 LOGOS Research Group and University of Barcelona, Spain filippo.contesi@gmail.com
Restricted access

Abstract

Noël Carroll's influence on the contemporary debate on the horror genre is hard to overestimate. His work on the topic is often celebrated as one of the best instances of interdisciplinary dialogue between film studies and philosophy of art. It has provided the foundations for the contemporary study of horror in art. Yet, for all the critical attention that his views on horror have attracted over the years, little scrutiny has been given to the nature itself of the emotion of horror in the genre. This article offers a critical understanding of the nature of the emotion of horror for Carroll, with a view to informing future investigations into the nature of horror in film (and beyond).

Contributor Notes

Filippo Contesi is Juan de la Cierva Postdoctoral Fellow in the LOGOS Research Group and at the University of Barcelona (Spain). He mainly works on issues in the philosophy of mind and arts. Email: filippo.contesi@gmail.com

Projections

The Journal for Movies and Mind

  • Aldana Reyes, Xavier. 2016. Horror Film and Affect: Towards a Corporeal Model of Viewership. London: Routledge.

  • Bantinaki, Katerina. 2012. “The Paradox of Horror: Fear as a Positive Emotion.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70: 383392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01530.x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carroll, Noël. 1990. The Philosophy of Horror, or Paradoxes of the Heart. London: Routledge.

  • Curtis, Valerie, and Adam Biran. 2001. “Dirt, Disgust, and Disease.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44: 1721. https://10.1353/pbm.2001.0001.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Sousa, Ronald. 1987. The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Douglas, Mary. (1966) 2003. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge.

  • Feagin, Susan. 1992. “Monsters, Disgust and Fascination.” Philosophical Studies 65: 7584. https://10.1007/BF00571317.

  • Gaut, Berys. 1993. “The Paradox of Horror.” British Journal of Aesthetics 33: 333345. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/33.4.333.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gaut, Berys. 1995. “The Enjoyment Theory of Horror: A Response to Carroll.” British Journal of Aesthetics 35: 284289. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/35.3.284.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herz, Rachel. 2012. That's Disgusting: Unraveling the Mysteries of Repulsion. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

  • Kelly, Daniel. 2011. Yuck! Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Radcliffe, Ann. 1826. “On the Supernatural in Poetry.” New Monthly Magazine 16: 145152.

  • Royzman, Edward, and John Sabini. 2001. “Something It Takes to Be an Emotion: The Interesting Case of Disgust.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 31: 2958. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00145.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rozin, Paul. n.d. “On the Origin of Disgust.” Emotion Researcher, http://emotionresearcher.com/on-the-origin-of-disgust/ (accessed: 2 September 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rozin, Paul, and April Fallon. 1987. “A Perspective on Disgust.” Psychological Review 94: 2341. https://10.1037//0033-295X.94.1.2.

  • Sauchelli, Andrea. 2014. “Horror and Mood.” American Philosophical Quarterly 51: 3950.

  • Shaw, Daniel, ed. 2001. Special Issue on Horror. Film & Philosophy 4: 1142.

  • Smuts, Aaron. 2009. “Horror.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film, ed. Painsley Livingston and Carl Plantinga, 505514. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Solomon, Robert. 2004. “Real Horror.” In In Defense of Sentimentality, 108130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Twitchell, James. 1985. Dreadful Pleasures: An Anatomy of Modern Horror. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 326 326 21
Full Text Views 60 60 7
PDF Downloads 71 71 14