Analytic Approaches and Critical Practices

On What We Can Learn

in Projections
Author:
Laura T. Di Summa William Paterson University, USA

Search for other papers by Laura T. Di Summa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship between philosophical accounts of criticism, largely within the analytic tradition, and the practice of criticism. Specifically, I am interested in the performative, subjective, and often idiosyncratic nature of such a practice and in the advantages it can deliver in the understanding of works of mass art, in the inquiry over the nature of aesthetic judgments, and in initiating aesthetic appreciation. Promoting such a connection is also, in turn, a way of at least partially bridging the divide between analytic approaches and the kind of work more typically conducted by scholars in film studies.

Contributor Notes

Laura T. Di Summa, an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at William Paterson University, is the co-editor of The Palgrave Handbook for the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures currently working on a monograph entitled: A Philosophy of Fashion through Film (Bloomsbury).

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Projections

The Journal for Movies and Mind

  • Balázs, Béla, and Russell Stockman. (1922) 2006. “Film Criticism!October 115: 5556. www.jstor.org/stable/40368413.

  • Brylla, Catalin, and Mette Kramer, eds. 2019. Cognitive Theory and Documentary Film. London: Palgrave McMillan.

  • Carney, Raymond. 1983. “Writing in the Dark: Film Criticism Today.” Chicago Review 34 (1): 89110. https://doi.org/10.2307/25305231.

  • Carroll, Noël. 1985. “The Power of Movies.” Daedalus 114 (4): 79103. www.jstor.org/stable/20025011.

  • Carroll, Noël. 2009. On Criticism. New York: Routledge.

  • Carroll, Noël. 2012. Living in an Artworld: Reviews and Essays on Dance, Performance, Theater, and the Fine Arts. Louisville, KY: Chicago Spectrum Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fischer, Saul. 2019. “Aesthetic Transformative Experience.” Paper presented at ASA American Society of Aesthetics Annual Meeting in Phoenix, AZ, 9 Oct.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldie, Peter. “The Ethics of Aesthetic Bootstrapping.” In The Aesthetic Mind: Philosophy and Psychology, ed. Elizabeth Shellekens and Peter Goldie, 106116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Indiana, Gary. 2018. Vile Days: The Village Voice Art Columns 1985–1988. South Pasadena: Semiotext(e).

  • James, Nick. 2009. “Rip It Up: Revitalizing Film Criticism.” Film Quarterly 62 (3): 1415. https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2009.62.3.14.

  • Kieran, Matthew. 2010. “The Vice of Snobbery: Aesthetic Knowledge, Justification, and Virtue in Art Appreciation.” Philosophical Quarterly 60: 243263. www.jstor.org/stable/40660404.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kivy, Peter. 1997. “The Laboratory of Fictional Truth.” In Philosophies of Arts: An Essay in Differences, 121139. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klevan, Andrew. 2018. Aesthetic Evaluation and Film. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Klevan, Andrew. 2019. “Criticism.” In The Palgrave Handbook for the Philosophy of Motion Pictures, ed. Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa, and Shawn Loht, 409439. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Naremore, James. 1990. “Authorship and the Cultural Politics of Film Criticism.” Film Quarterly 44 (1): 1423. https://doi.org/10.2307/1212695.

  • Nguyen, C. Thi. 2019. “Autonomy and Aesthetic Engagement.” Mind. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz054.

  • Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey. 2008. “The Rise and Fall of Criticism.” Film Quarterly 62 (1): 1011. https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2008.62.1.10.

  • Perkins, V. F. 1972. Film as Film: Understanding and Judging Movies. New York: Penguin Books.

  • Sontag, Susan. 1967. “Persona.” Sight and Sound. https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/2016/10/16/persona-review-susan-sontag/.

  • Walton, Kendall. (1970) 2008. “Categories of Art.” In Marvelous Images: On Values and the Arts, 195219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wimsatt, W. K. and Monroe Beardsley. 1946. “The Intentional Fallacy.” The Sewanee Review 54 (3): 468488. www.jstor.org/stable/27537676.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics