Film as the Engine for Learning

A Model to Assess Film's Interest Raising Potential

in Projections
Author:
Winnifred Wijnker Leiden University, Netherlands W.Wijnker@biology.leidenuniv.nl

Search for other papers by Winnifred Wijnker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ed S. Tan University of Copenhagen, Denmark E.S.H.Tan@uva.nl

Search for other papers by Ed S. Tan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Arthur Bakker Freudenthal Institute of Utrecht University, Netherlands A.Bakker4@uu.nl

Search for other papers by Arthur Bakker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tamara A. J. M. van Gog Department of Education, Utrecht University, Netherlands T.vanGog@uu.nl

Search for other papers by Tamara A. J. M. van Gog in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Paul H. M. Drijvers Freudenthal Institute of Utrecht University, Netherlands P.Drijvers@uu.nl

Search for other papers by Paul H. M. Drijvers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Film has been used for education ever since educators recognized its powerful potential for learning. But its educational application has been criticized throughout the decades for underuse of the distinctive potential of film: to raise interest. To understand more fully film's potential for learning, we propose a dynamic model of viewer interest and its underlying cognitive and emotional mechanisms (film's interest raising mechanisms or FIRM model). In addition, we present an analysis method for assessing the interestingness of films in learning contexts. Our model marries interest theories from cognitive film theory and educational psychology and captures the dynamics of interestingness across a film as depending on a balance between challenge posed and coping potential provided.

Contributor Notes

Winnifred Wijnker is a Postdoctoral researcher at the Science Communication & Society group of Leiden University, the Netherlands. She has a special interest in visual science communication, interest development, and research with an interdisciplinary approach. Winnifred was educated in Film studies and Film philosophy. In 2021, she completed her PhD at Utrecht University, titled “The Unseen Potential of Film for Learning: Film's Interest Raising Mechanisms Explained in Secondary Science and Mathematics Education,” of which this Projections article is a key component. E-mail: W.Wijnker@biology.leidenuniv.nl

Ed S. Tan is a Professor of Film, Media and Communication at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and an honorary fellow of the Amsterdam School of Communication Research. He taught at media, art, and communication departments in the Netherlands. His research currently focuses on cognitive film theory and the study of emotion in film viewing and the use of narrative in mediated communication. E-mail: E.S.H.Tan@uva.nl

Arthur Bakker is an Associate professor at the Freudenthal Institute of Utrecht University, the Netherlands. His research focuses on STEM education, technology-enhanced learning, attitudes, interest, boundary crossing, scaffolding, embodied design, and design research. E-mail: A.Bakker4@uu.nl

Tamara A. J. M. van Gog is a Professor of Educational Sciences at the Department of Education of Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Her research focuses on instructional design for example-based learning and multimedia learning, including teaching and learning with video and animation. E-mail: T.vanGog@uu.nl

Paul H. M. Drijvers is a Professor in Mathematics Education at the Freudenthal Institute of Utrecht University, the Netherlands. His research focuses on mathematics education, technology-enhanced learning, mathematical thinking, algebra education, and teacher education. E-mail: P.Drijvers@uu.nl

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Projections

The Journal for Movies and Mind

  • Akkerman, Sanne F. 2017. Grenzeloze Interesse [Interest without borders—Inaugural speech], 10 June. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/42713.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Akkerman, Sanne F., and Arthur Bakker. 2019. “Persons Pursuing Multiple Objects of Interest in Multiple Contexts.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 34 (1): 124. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0400-2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arnold, Magda B. 1960. Emotion and Personality. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Barrett, Lisa F. 2013. “Psychological Construction: The Darwinian Approach to the Science of Emotion.” Emotion Review 5 (4): 379389. http://doi.org/10.1177%2F1754073913489753

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berlyne, Daniel, ed. 1974. Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blakemore, Rebekah L., and Patrik Vuilleumier. 2017. “An Emotional Call to Action: Toward an Integrative Motor-Affective Neuroscience Model.” Emotion Review 9 (4): 299309. http://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916670020

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the Fiction Film. London: Routledge.

  • Bordwell, David, Kristin Thompson, and Jeff Smith. 2017. Film Art: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Cañas-Bajo, Jose, Teresa Cañas-Bajo, Eleni Berki, Juri-Pertri Valtanen, and Pertti Saariluoma. 2019. “Designing a New Method of Studying Feature-Length Films: An Empirical Study and Its Critical Analysis.” Projections 13 (3): 5378. http://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2019.130304

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Champoux, Joseph E. 1999. “Film as a Teaching Resource.” Journal of Management Inquiry 8 (2): 206217. http://doi.org/10.1177/105649269982016

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Sami Abuhamdeh, and Jeanne Nakamura. 2014. “Flow.” In Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, ed. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, 227238. Dordrecht: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cupchik, Gerald C., and Robert J. Gebotys. 1990. “Interest and Pleasure as Dimensions of Aesthetic Response.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 8: 114. http://doi.org/10.2190/L789-TPPY-BD2Q-T7TW.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dewey, John. 1913. Interest and Effort in Education. New York: Houghton Mifflin. http://doi.org/10.1037/14633-000.

  • Ekman, Paul. 1984. “Expression and the Nature of Emotion.” In Approaches to Emotion, ed. Klaus R. Scherer and Paul Ekman, 319343. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frijda, Nico H. 1986. The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Frijda, Nico H. 2007. The Laws of Emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315086071.

  • Frijda, Nico H. 2009. “Emotion Experience and Its Varieties.” Emotion Review 1 (3): 264271. http://doi.org/10.1177/1754073909103595

  • Haanstra, Folkert, Marie-Louise Damen, and Marjo van Hoorn. 2013. “Interestingness and Pleasingness of Drawings from Different Age and Expertise Groups.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 31 (2): 173194. http://doi.org/10.2190/EM.31.2.EOV.2

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansch, Anna, Katherine McConachie, Philipp Schmidt, Lisa Hillers, Christopher Newman, and Thomas Schildhauer. 2015. The Role of Video in Online Learning: Findings from the Field and Critical Reflections, 20 February. http://hiig.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/TopMOOC_Final-Paper.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hidi, Suzanne. 2006. “Interest: A Unique Motivational Variable.” Educational Research Review 1 (2): 6982. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Izard, Carroll E. 1977. “Interest-Excitement as Fundamental Motivation.” In Human Emotions: Emotions, Personality, and Psychotherapy, 211238. Boston: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2209-0_9.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Izard, Carroll E. 1992. “Basic Emotions, Relations among Emotions, and Emotion-Cognition Relations.” Psychological Review 99: 561565. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.561.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keltner, Dacher, Disa Sauter, Jessica Tracy, and Alan Cowen. 2019. “Emotional Expression: Advances in Basic Emotion Theory.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 43: 133160. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-019-00293-3.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krapp, Andreas. 1999. “Interest, Motivation and Learning: An Educational-Psychological Perspective.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 14 (1): 2340. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173109.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lazarus, Richard S. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Masson, Eef. 2012. Watch and Learn: Rhetorical Devices in Classroom Films after 1940. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. http://doi.org/10.1515/9789048514113.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McClusky, F. Dean 1947. “The Nature of the Educational Film.” Hollywood Quarterly 2 (4): 371380. http://doi.org/10.2307/1209533

  • Moors, Agnes, Yannick Boddez, and Jan de Houwer. 2017. “The Power of Goal-Directed Processes in the Causation of Goal-Directed and Other Actions.” Emotion Review 9 (4): 310318. http://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669595

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Niederhauser, Dale S., and Denise L. Lindstrom. 2018. “Instructional Technology Integration Models and Frameworks: Diffusion, Competencies, Attitudes, and Dispositions.” In Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, ed. Joke Voogt, Gerald Knezek, Rhonda Christensen, and Kwok-Wing Lai, 121. Cham: Springer International Publisher. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Panksepp, Jaak. 2005. “Affective Consciousness: Core Emotional Feelings in Animals and Humans.” Consciousness and Cognition 14 (1): 3080. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.004.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Patrick, Lyn, Esther Care, and Mary Ainley. 2011. “The Relationship between Vocational Interests, Self-Efficacy, and Achievement in the Prediction of Educational Pathways.” Journal of Career Assessment 19 (1): 6174. http://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710382615

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pekrun, Reinhart. 2019. “The Murky Distinction between Curiosity and Interest: State of the Art and Future Prospects.” Educational Psychology Review 31 (4): 905914. http://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10648-019-09512-1

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Plutchik, Robert. 1991. The Emotions. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

  • Porcher, Louis. 1975. “For an Active Spectator.” Educational Media International 2: 1216. http://doi.org/10.1080/09523987508548838.

  • Renninger, K. Ann, and Suzanne Hidi. 2016. The Power of Interest for Motivation and Engagement. London: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771045.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Russell, James A. 1980. “A Circumplex Model of Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 11611178. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Savelsbergh, Elwin R., Gjalt T. Prins, Charlotte Rietbergen, Sabine Fechner, Bram E. Vaessen, Jael M. Draijer, and Arthur Bakker. 2016. “Effects of Innovative Science and Mathematics Teaching on Student Attitudes and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Study.” Educational Research Review 19: 158172. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.003.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schachter, Stanley, and Jerome Singer. 1962. “Cognitive, Social, and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State.” Psychological Review 69 (5): 379399.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scherer, Klaus R. 2010. “The Component Process Model: A Blueprint for a Comprehensive Computational Model of Emotion.” In Blueprint for Affective Computing: A Sourcebook, ed. Klaus R. Scherer, Tanja Bänziger, and Etienne B. Roesch, 4770. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schiefele, Ulrich. 1991. “Interest, Learning, and Motivation.” Educational Psychologist 26 (3–4): 299323. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silvia, Paul J. 2005. “What Is Interesting? Exploring the Appraisal Structure of Interest.” Emotion 5 (1): 89102. http://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silvia, Paul J. 2006. Exploring the Psychology of Interest. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.0001.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silvia, Paul J. 2008. “Interest—The Curious Emotion.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 17 (1): 5760. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00548.x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tan, Ed S. 1996. Emotion and the Structure of Narrative Film: Film as an Emotion Machine. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Ebook 2013. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812761.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tan, Ed S. 2008. “Entertainment Is Emotion: The Functional Architecture of the Entertainment Experience.” Media Psychology 11 (1): 2851. http://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701853161

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tan, Ed S. 2018. “A Psychology of the Film.” Palgrave Communications 4 (1): 120. http://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0111-y.

  • Tan, Ed S., and Valentijn Visch. 2018. “Co-Imagination of Fictional Worlds in Film Viewing.” Review of General Psychology 22 (2): 230244. http://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000153

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomson, Andrew, Ruth Bridgstock, and Christiaan Willems. 2014. “‘Teachers Flipping Out’ beyond the Online Lecture: Maximising the Educational Potential of Video.” Journal of Learning Design 7 (3): 6778. http://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v7i3.209

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tobias, Sigmund. 1994. “Interest, Prior Knowledge, and Learning.” Review of Educational Research 64 (1): 3754. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001037

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vogl, Elisabeth, Reinhart Pekrun, Kou Murayama, and Kristina Loderer. 2020. “Surprised—Curious—Confused: Epistemic Emotions and Knowledge Exploration.” Emotion 20 (4): 625641. http://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000578.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wegner, Hart. 1977. Teaching with Film. Bloomington, IN: The Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

  • Wijnker, Winnifred, Arthur Bakker, Tamara A. J. M. van Gog, and Paul H. M. Drijvers. 2019. “Educational Videos from a Film Theory Perspective: Relating Teacher Aims to Video Characteristics.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (6): 31753197. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12725.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1121 317 16
Full Text Views 124 12 1
PDF Downloads 145 16 1