Dramatic Irony

A Case Study in the Mutual Benefit of Combining Social Neuroscience with Film Theory

in Projections
Author:
Cynthia Cabañas PhD Student, Birkbeck, University of London, UK ccaban01@mail.bbk.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Cynthia Cabañas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2920-3907
,
Atsushi Senju Reader in Social Neuroscience, Birkbeck, University of London, UK a.senju@bbk.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Atsushi Senju in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Tim J. Smith Professor of Cognitive Psychology, Birkbeck, University of London, UK tj.smith@bbk.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Tim J. Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2808-9401
Restricted access

Abstract

How do we understand the experiences of characters in a movie? Similar to real life, viewers attribute mental states to characters through a process known as Theory of Mind (ToM). Filmmakers commonly use Dramatic Irony, a narrative device where the audience knows something that at least one characters does not. From a social neuroscience perspective, understanding the cognitive mechanisms that underlie dramatic irony can provide a remarkable opportunity to study ToM in a more ecologically relevant context. While descriptive narrative theories of dramatic irony exist, these have never been studied in relation to contemporary social neuroscience. In this opinion piece, we aim to bring together these two traditionally isolated disciplines to propose a cross-disciplinary research roadmap for investigating the social neuroscience of dramatic irony in cinema.

Contributor Notes

Cynthia Cabañas, MSc, is a PhD Student in the Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London in the Cognition in Naturalistic Environments (CINE) lab under the supervision of Prof. Tim J. Smith and Dr. Atsushi Senju. She is interested in the role of theory of mind and empathy on film narrative comprehension and the cinematic formal features that filmmakers use to enhance these processes. Email: ccaban01@mail.bbk.ac.uk. ORCID: 0000-0002-2920-3907.

Tim J. Smith, PhD, is Professor of Cognitive Psychology in the Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London and head of the Cognition in Naturalistic Environments (CINE) Lab (www.cinelabresearch.com). His research covers all aspects of visual cognition with a special focus on the active perception of real and mediated scenes (e.g., TV and Film) via eye movements. Email: tj.smith@bbk.ac.uk. ORCID: 0000-0002-2808-9401.

Atsushi Senju, PhD, is Reader in Social Neuroscience in the Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development and Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London. His main research interest is the developmental origin of the “Social Brain” network, and its atypical development in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Email: a.senju@bbk.ac.uk.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Projections

The Journal for Movies and Mind

  • Baillargeon, Renée, Rose M. Scott, and Zijing He. 2010. “False-Belief Understanding in Infants.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (3): 110118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bálint, Katalin, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Miruna M. Doicaru, Frank Hakemulder, and Ed Tan. 2017. “The Effect of Suspense Structure on Felt Suspense and Narrative Absorption in Literature and Film.” Narrative Absorption 27: 177197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baron-Cohen, Simon, Alan M. Leslie, and Uta Frith. 1985. “Does the Autistic Child Have a ‘Theory of Mind’?Cognition 21 (1): 3746. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bordwell, David. 1991. Making Meaning: Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema. London: Harvard University Press.

  • Bordwell, David, Kristine Thompson, and Jeff Smith. 2019. Film Art: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Bottenhorn, Katherine. L., Jessica S. Flannery, Emily R. Boeving, Michael C. Riedel, Simon B. Eickhoff, Matthew T. Sutherland, and Angela R. Laird. 2018. “Cooperating Yet Distinct Brain Networks Engaged During Naturalistic Paradigms: A Meta-Analysis of Functional MRI Results.” Network Neuroscience 3 (1): 2748. https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00050

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bound, Keith. 2016. “‘Terror & Tension’ Psychophysiological Suspense: Defining a Framework to Measure Cinematic Suspense in 21st Century Horror Films.” PhD diss., Nottingham University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Branigan, Edward. 1992. Narrative Comprehension and Film. London: Routledge.

  • Brewer, William F., and Edward H. Lichtenstein. 1982. “Stories Are To Entertain: A Structural-Affect Theory of Stories.” Journal of Pragmatics 6 (5-6): 473486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(82)90021-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brylla, Catalin. 2018. “The Benefits of Content Analysis for Filmmakers.” Studies in Australasian Cinema 12 (2-3): 150161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503175.2018.1540097.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carruthers, Peter. 2013. “Mindreading in Infancy.” Mind & Language 28 (2): 141172. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12014

  • Cohn, Neil, and Eva Wittenberg. 2015. “Action Starring Narratives and Events: Structure and Inference in Visual Narrative Comprehension”. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 27 (7): 812828. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1051535

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Currie, Gregory, and Ian Ravenscroft. 2002. Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D'Aloia, Adriano, and Ruggero Eugeni. “Neurofilmology: An Introduction.” Neurofilmology: Audiovisual Studies and the Challenge of Neuroscience (special issue). Cinema & Cie.XIV (22-23): 926.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dmochowski, Jacek P., Paul Sajda, Joao Dias, and Lucas C. Parra. 2012. “Correlated Components of Ongoing EEG Point to Emotionally Laden Attention—A Possible Marker of Engagement?Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 (112). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dudai, Yadin. 2012. “The Cinema-Cognition Dialogue: A Match Made in Brain.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 (248). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eickhoff, Simon B., Michael Milham, and Tamara Vanderwal. 2020. “Towards Clinical Applications of Movie fMRI.” Neuroimage 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116860.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gallagher, Shaun. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gallagher, Shaun. 2008. “Understanding Others: Embodied Social Cognition.” In Handbook of Cognitive Science, ed. Paco Calvo and Toni Gomila, 437452. Boston: Elsevier.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gallese, Vittorio. 2007. “Before and Below ‘Theory of Mind’: Embodied Simulation and the Neural Correlates of Social Cognition.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362 (1480): 659669. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldie, Peter. 2007. “Dramatic Irony, Narrative, and the External Perspective.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 60: 6984. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246107000045.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldman, Alvin I. 2006. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gopnik, Alison, and Andrew Meltzoff. 1997. Words, Thoughts, and Theories. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Grall, Clare, and Emily S. Finn. 2021. The “Naturalistic” Fallacy: Leveraging the Power of Media to Drive Cognition. Media for Neuroscience (manuscript).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasson, Uri, Janice Chen, and Christopher J. Honey. 2015. “Hierarchical Process Memory: Memory as an Integral Component of Information Processing.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (6): 304313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasson, Uri, Ohad Landesman, Barbara Knappmeyer, Igancio Vallines, Nava Rubin, and David Heeger. 2008. “Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film.” Projections 2 (1): 126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasson, Uri, Yuval Nir, Ifat Levy, Galit Fuhrmann, and Rafael Malach. 2004. “Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity during Natural Vision.” Science 303 (5664): 16341640.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hinde, Stephen J., Tim J. Smith, and Iain D. Gilchrist. 2018. “Does Narrative Drive Dynamic Attention to a Prolonged Stimulus?Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 3 (45): 112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hitchcock, Alfred. 1948. “Let ‘Em Play God.” Hollywood Reporter 100: 47. Reprinted in Sidney Gottlieb, ed. 1995. Hitchcock on Hitchcock: Selected Writings and Interviews. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holleman, Gijs A., Ignace T. C. Hooge, Chantal Kemner, and Roy S. Hessels. 2020. “The ‘real-World Approach’ and Its Problems: A Critique of the Term Ecological Validity.” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (721). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00721.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hutson, John P., Tim J. Smith, Joseph P. Magliano, and Lester C. Loschky. 2017. “What is the Role of the Film Viewer? The Effects of Narrative Comprehension and Viewing Task on Gaze Control in Film.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2 (46): 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0080-5

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hutson, John P., Tim J. Smith, Joseph P. Magliano, and Lester C. Loschky. 2021. “‘This Ticking Noise in My Head’: How Sound Design, Dialogue, Event Structure, and Viewer Working Memory Interact in the Comprehension of Touch of Evil (1958).” Projections 15 (1): 127. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2021.150102

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hutto, Daniel D. 2004- “The Limits of Spectatorial Folk Psychology.” Mind & Language 19 (5): 548573.

  • Keysers, Christian, and Valeria Gazzola. 2009. “Expanding the Mirror: Vicarious Activity for Actions, Emotions, and Sensations.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 19 (6): 666671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.10.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Király, Ildokó, Katalin Oláh, Gerely Csibra, and Ágnes M. Kovács. “Retrospective Attribution of False Beliefs in 3-Year-Old Children.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (45): 1147711482. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803505115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klin, Ami, Warren Jones, Robert Schultz, Fred Volkmar, and Donald Cohen. 2002. “Visual Fixation Patterns during Viewing of Naturalistic Social Situations as Predictors of Social Competence in Individuals with Autism”. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59 (9): 809816. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.809.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lavandier, Yves. 2005. Writing Drama: A Comprehensive Guide for Playwrights and Scriptwriters. Cergy Cedex: Le Clown & l'Enfant.

  • Lerner, Yulia, Christopher J. Honey, Lauren J. Silbert, and Uri Hasson. 2011. “Topographic Mapping of a Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows Using a Narrated Story.” Journal of Neuroscience 31 (8): 29062915. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3684-10.2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loschky, Lester C., Adam M. Larson, Tim J. Smith, and Joseph P. Magliano. 2020. “The Scene Perception & Event Comprehension Theory (SPECT) Applied to Visual Narratives.” Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (1): 311351. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12455

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacDowell, James. 2016. Irony in Film. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Magliano, Joseph P., and Arthur C. Graesser. 1991. “A Three-Pronged Method for Studying Inference Generation in Literary Text.” Poetics 20 (3): 193232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(91)90007-c

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Michael, John, Wayne D. Christensen, and Søren Overgaard. 2014. “Mindreading as Social Expertise.” Synthese 191 (5): 817840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0295-z

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morton, Lois W., Sanford D. Eigenbrode, and Timothy A. Martin. 2015. “Architectures of Adaptive Integration in Large Collaborative Projects.” Ecology and Society 20 (4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07788-200405.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newman, Michael. 2006. “Characterization as Social Cognition in Welcome to the Dollhouse.” Film Studies 8 (1): 5367. https://doi.org/10.7227/fs.8.7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oakley, Todd, and Vera Tobin. 2012. “Attention, Blending, and Suspense in Classic and Experimental Film.” In Blending and the Study of Narrative, ed. Ralf Schneider and Marcus Hartner. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Poldrack, Russel A. 2006. “Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred from Neuroimaging Data?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2): 5963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Premack, David, and Guy Woodruff. 1978. “Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (4): 515526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raz, Gal, Yael Jacob, Tal Gonen, Yonatan Winetraub, Tamar Flash, Eyal Soreq, and Talma Hendler. 2014. “Cry For Her or Cry With Her: Context-Dependent Dissociation of Two Modes of Cinematic Empathy Reflected in Network Cohesion Dynamics.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9 (1): 3038. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst052

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richardson, Hilary, and Rebecca Saxe. 2019. “Development of Predictive Responses in Theory of Mind Brain Regions.” Developmental Science 23 (1): e12863. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12863.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rooney, Brendan, and Katalin E. Bálint. 2018. “Watching More Closely: Shot Scale Affects Film Viewers’ Theory of Mind Tendency But Not Ability.” Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2349). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00261.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rutherford, Richard B. 2012. Greek Tragic Style: Form, Language and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Savardi, Mattia, Andreas B. Kovács, Alberto Signoroni, and Sergio Benini. 2020. “CineScale: A Dataset of Cinematic Shot Scale in Movies.” Data in Brief 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmälzle, Ralf, and Clare Grall. 2020. “The Coupled Brains of Captivated Audiences: An Investigation of the Collective Brain Dynamics of an Audience Watching a Suspenseful Film.” Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 32 (4): 187199. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000271

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Senju, Atsushi. 2013. “Atypical Development of Spontaneous Social Cognition in Autism Spectrum Disorders.” Brain and Development 35 (2): 96101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2012.08.002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G., and Judit Aharon-Peretz. 2007. “Dissociable Prefrontal Networks for Cognitive and Affective Theory of Mind: A Lesion Study.” Neuropsychologia 45 (13): 30543067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.021

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shimamura, Arthur P. 2013. Psychocinematics: Issues and Directions.

  • Singer, Tania, and Claus Lamm. 2009. “The Social Neuroscience of Empathy.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1156: 8196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, Murray. 2011. “Triangulating Aesthetic Experience.” In Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience, ed. Arthur P. Shimamura and Stephen E. Palmer, 80102. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732142.003.0026.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, Susan. 2000. Hitchcock: Suspense, Humour and Tone. London: British Film Institute.

  • Smith, Tim J., Daniel Levin, and James E. Cutting. 2012. “A Window on Reality: Perceiving Edited Moving Images.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (2): 107113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, Tim J. 2013. “Watching You Watch Movies: Using Eye Tracking to Inform Film Theory.” In Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies, ed. Arthur P. Shimamura, 165191. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spaulding, Shannon. 2012. “Introduction to Debates on Embodied Social Cognition.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (4): 431448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-012-9275-x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tan, Ed. S. 1996. Emotion and the Structure of Film: Film as an Emotion Machine. Trans. Barbara Fasting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trabasso, Tom, and Joseph P. Magliano. 1996. “Conscious Understanding during Comprehension.” Discourse Processes 21 (3): 255287. https://doiorg/10.1080/01638539609544959.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Truffaut, François. 1985. Hitchcock. New York: Simon & Schuster.

  • Vanderwal, Tamara, Jeffrey Eilbott, and Xavier F. Castellanos. 2019. “Movies in the Magnet: Naturalistic Paradigms in Developmental Functional Neuroimaging.” Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 36 (100600). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.10.004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Völlm, Brigit A., Alexander N. W. Taylor, Paul Richardson, Rhiannon Corcoran, John Stirling, Shane McKie, John F W Deakin, Rebecca Elliott. 2006. “Neuronal Correlates of Theory of Mind and Empathy: a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in a Nonverbal Task.” Neuroimage 29 (1): 9098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.022

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wagner, Dylan D., William M. Kelley, James V. Haxby, and Todd F. Heatherton. 2016. “The Dorsal Medial Prefrontal Cortex Responds Preferentially to Social Interactions during Natural Viewing.” Journal of Neuroscience 36 (26): 69176925. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4220-15.2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wellman, Henry M., and Jaqueline D. Woolley. 1990. “From Simple Desires to Ordinary Beliefs: The Early Development of Everyday Psychology.” Cognition 35 (3): 24575. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90024-e

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wellman, Henry M., David Cross, and Julanne Watson. 2001. “Meta-Analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development: The Truth about False Belief.” Child Development 72 (3): 655684.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wimmer, Heinz, and Josef Perner. 1983. “Beliefs about Beliefs: Representation and constraining Function of Wrong Beliefs in Young Children's Understanding of Deception.” Cognition 13 (1): 103128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zacks, Jeffrey M., Nicole K. Speer, and Jeremy R. Reynolds. 2009. “Segmentation in Reading and Film Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138 (2): 30727. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015305

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zaki, Jamil, and Kevin Ochsner. 2009. “The Need for a Cognitive Neuroscience of Naturalistic Social Cognition.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1167 (16): 1630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04601.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1871 662 17
Full Text Views 205 17 0
PDF Downloads 225 31 0